Sentences with phrase «author of this review points»

Authors of this review point out that early post-menopausal women who took 2 grams of maca, in capsule form, daily showed improvements in hormone levels and reductions in menopausal symptoms — like night sweats and hot flashes.

Not exact matches

Explaining their findings in Harvard Business Review, the study's authors, Harvard's Robert Huckman and Bradley Staats of the University of North Carolina, pointed to the time it takes new team members to learn how to communicate with one another and determine who is the best authority in different areas.

Finally, imagine that in a review of «Christ in the Concert Hall,» a gifted musician / author came along and pointed out that the author focused on «only one current» within the diverse river of Christianity.

In order to understand it, we must lay some groundwork by reviewing what the author of the book of Hebrews has said up to this point.

He understood, said the Review, that the evil of racism was not unique: «It is, as the author points out, the same problem of prejudice which in varying degrees affects all groups of whatever color, race or religion.

A review that does not honestly deal with the substance of a book but only with the perceived political and / or psychological point of view of the author is a poor review.

Shriver says that he and Erlich pointed out their concerns to the study authors in their reviews of the paper for Science.

The authors hope their review will provide a useful starting point for evaluating the impact of changes in marijuana legislation.

The authors point to studies of harmful and beneficial effects of thrombolytic and antiarrhythmic drugs for myocardial infarction, for example: «Not only would systematic reviews... have reduced waste resulting from unjustified research, they would also have shown how to reduce morbidity and sometimes mortality, both in patients allocated to relatively less effective or actually harmful treatments in unnecessary trials, and in patients generally,» the authors write.

From how much space the authors devote to background information and literature reviews, to their use of bullet points to describe their goals, these methods of presenting information «leave an impression on you,» says Franklin.

The review authors point to the vegetarians» abundant intake of whole grains, fruits and vegetables as the key to their improved weight loss, noting that higher - fiber diets have been proven to be more satisfying.

Thus the authors review in detail the educational experiences and points of view of the last President Bush and President Obama, and they would argue that neither No Child Left Behind nor Race to the Top were written in the cards: the programs were specifically shaped by presidents whose own educational experiences demonstrated to them the need for effort and judgment.

I was shopping for a 2011 C300 4Matic Sport Mercedes Benz and choose King Point Auto primarily due to the reviews on Mike... I don't know if he is the... author of the cars description, but it was right on point: words like «clean» and «sexy» were accurate in describing thePoint Auto primarily due to the reviews on Mike... I don't know if he is the... author of the cars description, but it was right on point: words like «clean» and «sexy» were accurate in describing thepoint: words like «clean» and «sexy» were accurate in describing the car.

Passive Guy had a highly interesting query for the commenters: why don't authors who've suffered an onslaught of one - star reviews point it out in the book description on Amazon?

Most of them apply with an extra exclamation point for those who are receiving review copies for free from the publisher or author.

Unfortunately, I've also been in contact with a number of authors who had less than stellar things to say about the company, and at a certain point I realized that they weren't going to hold up with a good review.

Barlow did point out some of the things that were missing when an author decides to self - publish, namely things like promotion, professional reviews, and support from the imprint.

I defended my review of another author's book and also pointed out that out of my hundreds of reviews averaging 4.3 and up on Amazon, only five were authors who'd I also read.

And that is the point that I hopefully made in the article, that there are authors who not only rant but who enlist their legions of readers to counterattack a negative review.

But one of my points in other posts was, why is it that if a reviewer has a problem with an author regarding a review, the reviewer goes and gets their friends to join in and attack the author?

A few of their key selling points are; Guaranteed book reviews with Readers» Favorite and Story Cartel, Promotion through PR Newswire, Author Marketing Club, and WriterCube, and an Exclusive guide: Ultimate Social Media Marketing for Authors.

An excellent book review is beyond that and you need to describe the theme of the book, analyze every part of it and also the major points that conveyed by the author through the themes.

In his review, Hunter makes a point of stating that while he does read the books that are sent to him (an author must put in a request beforehand) he makes it clear that there is little chance that he will mention it.

That is then coupled with an attitude that can be found on the Kindle author boards, which says that anyone giving a self - published author a bad review is «jealous» — or in extreme cases that bad reviews are obviously the work of the evil publishers, trying to knock the competition, and that the last thing you should do is pay attention to those nit - pickers who point out problems with your work.

A concentrated burst of sales and reviews is the fastest way to move up Amazon's list, at which point they promote you themselves, so some authors pay for reviews.

Despite the naysayers who have already come out of the woodwork to express dubious opinions about Penguin's motives and its ability to maintain the site purely for the furthering of the craft, Book Country exists to encourage writers and readers to come together via the web to read, review, and discuss each others» manuscripts in order to bring them to the point the authors wish.

June 22nd: Starter Day Party @ I Heart Reading June 23rd: Book Excerpt @ Indy Book Fairy June 24th: Book Excerpt @ Sunshine Book Promotions June 25th: Promo Post @ Nat's Book Nook June 26th: Book Review and Author Interview @ Mommy's Point of View June 28th: Promo Post @ Undercover Book Reviews June 29th:...

DRM makes it hard for the author to distribute copies for review, and if the platform goes down at some point in the future, all of the author's books will become unreadable.

Every indie author comes to the point in their career where they're going to have to secure book reviews and from what I've observed, not many of us are good at it.

It's not unlike the process I recommend to authors or professionals when they are researching a self publishing company: Locate a number of comparison or review sites and allocate a point system to come up with a combined value for all the firms you are researching.

Critical essay or book review is what the name assumes - you need to write a critical review of a book, to analyze the ideas, to discuss points made by author, to provide your own evaluation of publication.

The purpose of book review writing is to communicate your own ideas and sensations about the book, its points, author's writing style, events described in the book, opinion about the characters, etc..

I'd just like to point out that after dealing with an arrogant twit this morning, who demanded I review his book and then go huffy about it, reading and reviewing REAL author Amie Gibbons was a breath of fresh air.

She noted with another light laugh that some authors who practically beg to have their book reviewed will often focus in on the one negative she might point out at the end of a review and give her a hard time for that, forgetting that having a generally positive review is rare and valuable.

This may seem like a duh point, but the vetting committee read samplings of each author and had to distinguish candidates based on critical reviews of their work.

While I'm here, I would also like to point out that traditionally published authors are also not entirely above assholish behavior in the face of negative reviews.

The other point that gets lost in «The Best Book Reviews» piece is that paying for book reviews is not just the pervue of indie aReviews» piece is that paying for book reviews is not just the pervue of indie areviews is not just the pervue of indie authors.

At this point, we've reviewed hundreds of fiction and nonfiction book covers, and those posts are becoming an incredible resource for authors, publishers and designers.

Samantha reports that she gets more requests for interviews and actually prefers them, since that gives the author a better chance to describe the book's contents than a review, which is often unpredictable in quality or point of view.

Filed Under: Investing Tagged With: Chart Tool, Charts For Investing, Finance, Free Charts for Investing, Investing, Point And Figure Chart, Stock Chart, Thinkorswim Editorial Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, or other advertiser and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

Filed Under: Investing, Mortgage Tagged With: home equity, home equity shares, Point Financial, Point Financial review Editorial Disclaimer: Opinions expressed here are author's alone, not those of any bank, credit card issuer, airlines or hotel chain, or other advertiser and have not been reviewed, approved or otherwise endorsed by any of these entities.

At least, I hope the points I made throughout my own review were valid as the ultimate goal of any review is to justify and explain the final opinion of the author.

The author wishes to thank Pace Gallery for its help in arranging time with the artist, Zhang Xiaogang, for purposes of clarifying many of the points raised in this review, and for the indispensable translations of Ms. Echo He.

Weart is best known to Dot Earth regulars as the author of the essential guide to 100 years of research pointing to a human influence on climate, «The Discovery of Global Warming» (here's my 2003 review of that book for The Times).

For instance, the United States government in submitting their points for review, commented on «several inconsistencies» and stated «it is essential that the chapters not be finalized prior to the completion of the discussions at the IPCC Plenary in Madrid, and that the chapter authors be prevailed upon to modify their text in an appropriate manner following discussion in Madrid.»

Accordingly, all articles published in Science — including editorials, news and comment, and books reviews — are signed and reflect the individual views of the authors and not official points of view adopted by AAAS or the institutions with which the authors are affiliated.»

«In particular, it is not obvious, as of today, whether it is more efficient to approach the problem of constructing a theory of climate dynamics starting from the framework of hamiltonian mechanics and quasi-equilibrium statistical mechanics or taking the point of view of dissipative chaotic dynamical systems, and of non-equilibrium statistical mechanics, and even the authors of this review disagree.

I agree with your 3 points, but I would recommend more general statements, for example, author disclosure of potential conflicts of interest (financial or NON-financial — such as membership in related organizations / lobbies) and transparency in the peer - review process (e.g. reviewers to be identified).

At this point i was already well past the point of annoyment at these repeated commandments of Awe to the Badassery, and well into the dangerous zone where i had the impression the author was here in my room, wagging merrily his genitals and asking me if i liked gun reviews, perchance.

I would like to emphasize that the whole process of preparation of IPCC Reports is characterized by discussion which takes place within and across author teams and a rigorous process of review which serves the purpose of incorporating diverse points of view at various stages of drafting of the report.»