Not exact matches
Thiel is the
author of «Zero to One: Notes
on Startups, or How to Build the Future,» a book that's widely
read by founders.
The «Suddenly in Charge»
author recommends
reading business news daily «so you can speak intelligently
on business matters.»
It would have been easy to dismiss her challenge, but now that I'm a published
author, now that Bodies
on the Potomac is out there in the public domain being
read by friends and family and strangers alike, I realize that listening to a respected friend's advice might be the catalyst others can use to break through.
As I recall the headline
read, more or less, «Women Don't Negotiate Because They're Not Dumb,» and the
author went
on to cite research to make her point that when women do ask for more money, people tend to hate it, and «pushy» women end up paying mightily in terms of career progression and opportunities.
«There was a clear pattern in the findings - the more literary fiction
authors that participants recognized, the better they tended to perform
on the emotional recognition test, and this association held even after statistically accounting for the influence of other factors that might be connected to both emotion skills and
reading more literary fiction, such as past educational attainment, gender and age,» reports the British Psychological Society Research Digest blog, summing up the results.
Here's an experience I've had over time that I'm guessing you can relate to: many of the books I've
read that have taught me the most or had the greatest impact
on me do not appear
on the recommended lists of business luminaries, famous
authors, or Hollywood stars.
A timely choice from The Life Project
author Helen Pearson: «
Reading or rereading this book should be compulsory, when so many of the issues it touches
on — manipulated news, unwanted surveillance — are highly resonant today.»
So they pulled out all the stops by experimenting with an in - store cafe, free Wi - Fi, monthly book swaps, a children's play area, entertainment, more than 200 in - store
author readings a year and community forums
on topics of interest to customers.
Milyutin said he would
read blogs and books
on education — and if he liked what he'd
read, he'd get in touch with the
author to learn more.
I've already passed along recommendations for possible fall
reading, but I just stumbled
on a great list of winter
reads from Slack VP of engineering, blogger, and
author Michael Lopp.
The Internet giant recently announced it would pay certain
authors based
on the number of pages
read in a book, rather than the number of times that a work is downloaded.
Speakers: * Stewart Rogers, Director of Marketing Technology * Jay Baer, social media guru and best - selling
author «Hug your Haters» * Wendy Schuchart, moderator, VentureBeat For more information
on VB Insight, go to Insight.venturebeat.com to
read the latest research and marketing analysis.
Best - selling
author John Mauldin's new book teaches you how to
read the direction of the market, so you can make decisions that capitalize
on today's investment opportunities.
This account I started this year after
reading about it from several different
authors on Seeking Alpha (side note: if you are interested in Dividend Growth Investing and managing your retirement portfolio you HAVE to check out this site, it's one of my main sources for stock research).
But it seems to me that one of the problems with academic articles is that the reader doesn't get a chance to comment
on the article, and the
author doesn't get the chance to
read readers» comments and respond to them.
Oh, and he is also an active real estate investor, entrepreneur, traveler, third - person speaker, husband, and
author of «The Book
on Investing in Real Estate with No (and Low) Money Down ``, and «The Book
on Rental Property Investing» which you should probably
read if you want to do more deals.
I come to these conversations based
on what I
read from the
author and only contribute my own voice to counter what I feel is a diatribe of irrational and fantasy charmed people with letters after their names who have no idea of what they write about.
While personally,
authors may be supporters or protestors of the Segwit2x hard fork, in most situations, you wouldn't be able to tell just by
reading their articles
on the subject.
Had that entries»
authors referred to plain - old Wikipedia's entry
on «Price revolution,» they would have
read there that
Speaking of a system bulging with debt protruding from every crevice, Jim Quinn's Burning Platform featured a must -
read article yesterday in which the
author has discovered that the Loan - To - Value Ratio
on Fannie Mae - issued mortgages is now at its highest level in history — nearly 10 % higher than at the peak of housing bubble 1.0:
Now that the
author has so successfully catalogued many of the great ideas of Charlie Munger, I hope to
read future works by Griffin that are focused
on more controversial subjects at the margins of modern value investing.
We agree with Peter Cohan,
author of the Inc. article «4 Ways to Know You're Selling to the Right Market»,
on his thoughts
on the importance of sell...
Read More >>
Personally I think McClung is more transparent in his methodology than the majority of
authors I've
read on the topic.
Authored by Asia investment legend Peter Churchouse, The Churchouse Letter is essential
reading for investors — in Asia and around the world — focused
on building wealth in the world's most dynamic and fast - growing economies.
Here's what Jean Yarbrough of Bowdoin, the distinguished
author of pathbreaking books
on President TJ and President TR, wrote: I
read this post with great interest, as....
«I have
read some good commentary
on Ecclesiastes and the
author points out that this is Solomon trying everything under the sun, minus God.
When I
read the headline of this article
on RealClear Politics, I thought the
authors were making a familiar conservative case — that Barack Obama's learning curve in the Oval Office is impossibly steep, that he was (and remains) underqualified for the job.
Missouri Synod theologians had traditionally affirmed the inerrancy of the Bible, and, although such a term can mean many things, in practice it meant certain rather specific things: harmonizing of the various biblical narratives; a somewhat ahistorical
reading of the Bible in which there was little room for growth or development of theological understanding; a tendency to hold that God would not have used within the Bible literary forms such as myth, legend, or saga; an unwillingness to reckon with possible creativity
on the part of the evangelists who tell the story of Jesus in the Gospels or to consider what it might mean that they write that story from a post-Easter perspective; a general reluctance to consider that the canons of historical exactitude which we take as givens might have been different for the biblical
authors.
Reading all these comments leads me to believe that the
author of this piece was
on to something.
There is no reason why Jacobs should not lampoon a book after a brief glance rather than dignifying it with a review, but it is a bit much to accompany the caricature with advice to the
author on the virtues of close
reading.
On this foundation one can then construct a fuller cultural edifice of other
authors who are worth
reading, a house of intellect that is wide, diverse, and generously pluralistic.
Reading articles like this is so painful because it is so obvious the
author knows nothing about any of the religions he's writing
on.
That's one of the things I was pointing out to someone who
read a book
on necromancy (long island medium) and was totally sold
on everything the
author wrote and was now at «peace» from
reading about the endless cycles of death — i.e. soul coming back as such... dying then coming back again as another.
Authors Ed Dobson and Ed Hindson, professors at Liberty Baptist College in Virginia, base their reasonably balanced effort to define and locate fundamentalism
on a wide
reading of secondary sources and present a convenient summary as well as a campaign document.
The ambassador claimed, in his letter to Clinton, that the inspector general report's
authors had «failed to
read any of my writing or see its highly positive effect
on our bilateral relations.»
So a correct
reading here depends
on seeing things through the eyes of the viewpoint character and
author, the human
author of Genesis.
When you
read in the Bible about proclaiming Jesus as Lord, following Jesus, taking up your cross, eternal reward, inheriting the Kingdom, life in the Spirit, faithful living, and
on and
on and
on, the
author who wrote that text was primarily thinking of how we should live as followers of Jesus so that we can experience the life God meant for us to live.
The
author insists
on a literal
reading of the biblical accounts that would seem to support his quasi-Unitarian Christology while skipping over passages that contradict his views.
On the contrary, every time a biblical author sketches the eschaton, humans are on earth using various kinds of cultural goods, cooking meals, living in houses, walking on roads, raising banners, blowing trumpets, using domesticated animals, sitting on chairs, reading books, and so o
On the contrary, every time a biblical
author sketches the eschaton, humans are
on earth using various kinds of cultural goods, cooking meals, living in houses, walking on roads, raising banners, blowing trumpets, using domesticated animals, sitting on chairs, reading books, and so o
on earth using various kinds of cultural goods, cooking meals, living in houses, walking
on roads, raising banners, blowing trumpets, using domesticated animals, sitting on chairs, reading books, and so o
on roads, raising banners, blowing trumpets, using domesticated animals, sitting
on chairs, reading books, and so o
on chairs,
reading books, and so
onon.
Rev Dr Sean Doherty, co-founder of Living Out and
author of The Only Way is Ethics (Authentic) believes we must allow a
reading of Genesis 1 - 3 to shape our view
on gender dysphoria, and the possibility of subsequent surgery.
You know, this
author wrote a thoughtful, balanced article, but many of the «comments» I have
read so far are short
on substance and heavy
on cynicism.
In a recent book I
read (Engaging the Powers), the
author suggested that such a response is natural in light of the ever - increasing tide of natural catastrophes and human tragedies that are paraded before our eyes
on Television and the Newspapers
on a daily basis.
Among them will be the Orthodox theologian John Zizioulas
on «An Ontology of Love: A Patristic
Reading of Dietrich von Hildebrand's The Nature of Love»; philosopher Josef Seifert
on «Dietrich von Hildebrand
on Benevolence in Love and Friendship»; and literary scholar Brian Sudlow (
author of Catholic Literature and Secularization in France and England 1880 - 1914)
on «The Non-Violence of Love: A Hildebrand - Girard Encounter.»
«Infallible,»
on the other hand, invites all interpretive procedures which allow for a full
reading of the
author's intention in his communication, understood in the historical situation from which and to which he speaks.
Below I offer some critical comments, based
on a very rapid
reading, concerning the exegetical method employed and the unbalanced conclusions reached concerning the
authors of the Bible.
In The Spiritual Life (Harper, n.d.) she pleaded: «We can not begin the day by a real act of communion with the
Author of peace and Lover of concord, and then go
on to
read a bloodthirsty newspaper at breakfast.»
But
on the brighter side,
reading cra * like this
author's only convinces me more that religions are totally whacked.
Even the
author of the greatest book written
on America, Alexis de Tocqueville, didn't think most Americans should
read the great books written by the Greeks and Romans.
It was a flawed work, but I could not have deliberately landed
on another book written in the last half century by an American
author that deserved to be
read with more care.
Also, if you
read more from the
author of said article and his cohort you will find remarkable similarities with material
on ND's sites.