Sentences with phrase «authored a paper commenting»

«That brain volume (about 500cc), implies significantly less brain power than recent humans,» added Stringer, who authored a paper commenting on the finds.

Not exact matches

(3) The authors of this paper note that simplistic advice to avoid bedsharing may actually cause harm, commenting «Parents of young infants need to feed them during the night, sometimes several times, and if we demonise the parents» bed we may be in danger of the sofa being chosen.

«It was really surprizing to realize that oncogenic Pik3ca in basal cells induced the formation of luminal tumours, while its expression in luminal cells gave rise to heterogeneous and more aggressive tumors including basal - like tumors,» comments Alexandra Van Keymeulen, the first author of the paper.

Have all authors read the paper prior to submission, and been given the opportunity to comment?

Dr. Steven L. Shafer of Stanford University, Editor - in - Chief of Anesthesia & Analgesia, believes the new paper will have profound implications for digital sharing of patient data, «For my entire term as Editor, I have pushed authors to share data, under the assumption that anonymized data could be safely shared,» he comments.

HLI responded to that by confirming that «authors were given an opportunity to review and comment on the paper».

In the usual journal review process, a couple of people review the paper and send it back with comments, and the author grumbles and then enters a discussion: «OK, I'll change this but not that.»

(The authors declined to comment because the paper has been submitted to a peer - reviewed journal.)

Gerald Schatten of the University of Pittsburgh in Pennsylvania, who was the corresponding author on the paper and provided the high - resolution images to Science, declined to comment.

Professor Nadine Foster, Keele University — lead author of one of the papers, comments: «Funders should pay only for high - value care, stop funding ineffective or harmful tests and treatments, and importantly intensify research into prevention.»

Dr Pam Sonnenberg, lead author of the paper commented that: «These findings suggest that only testing those who are currently symptomatic would miss the majority of infections.

Nemeroff referred ScienceInsider to comments he made to Nature saying that while STI assisted the authors, «We wrote the paper.»

Carl Turesson, lead author of the paper, commented that: «to our knowledge, this is the first nested case - control study to investigate this issue in men.»

The authors of that paper declined to comment on Hamm's findings.

Nature» snews team has asked the paper's corresponding author, stem - cell scientist Yong Fan, for comment, but had not heard from him by the time of this report.

Commenting on the findings Dr Saverio Stranges, the research paper's lead author, said: «Along with smoking, fruit and vegetable consumption was the health - related behaviour most consistently associated with both low and high mental wellbeing.

Commenting on the findings Dr Saverio Stranges, the research paper's lead author, said: «The data suggest that higher an individual's fruit and vegetable intake the lower the chance of their having low mental wellbeing.»

The authors thank Tobias Breuer, Sofia Marazopoulou and Leopold Flasch for conducting pollen transfer experiments, Gabi Camargo for comments on an earlier version of the paper, Oliver Krohn for technical assistance and the Untere Landschaftsbehörde Düsseldorf for the necessary permits.

The authors would like to thank the referee for valuable comments that helped to improve the quality of the paper.

Three further authors from the paper also give their comment here, «here» being somewhere that is mindful of presenting a reliable and honest account of the paper, unlike on Wattsupia and those other the planets in the deniosphere.

Eight days ago, Shalon (Babbitt) Ledbetter, the first author of the 2005 paper published in Cell, posted a comment on the site announcing the paper was going to be retracted after the last author's institution, Saint Louis University (SLU), determined that some figures had been manipulated by the last author, Dorota Skowrya.

After the paper appeared, researcher Kenneth Witwer at Johns Hopkins — who was not a co-author — posted comments on PubMed Commons and the paper itself, noting that the authors hadn't properly designed the experiment, making it impossible for them to detect broccoli microRNAs.

All authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.

Comments: SDSS - IV collaboration alphabetical author data release paper.

«If you can't understand water, you can't understand proteins,» said Dr. Soohaeng Yoo, one of the authors of this paper, commenting about his upcoming studies.

Thus the paper in its current state doesn't fit the quality and novelty requirements and we recommend that the manuscript should potentially be revised and reconsidered for publication in the future if the authors can satisfactory address the different comments raised.

Editors may ask authors to revise papers in light of reviewer comments.

Positive comments from some recent users of this book include: Most schools are full of documents and data... Dr Slater is among the first to show how they can be used to compare what is said on paper and in interviews... The results will shock you... Dr Slater is a successful high school teacher and an award winning author... and here's why... Fantastic little book, punches well above its weight... Makes it seem so simple... the art of the genius... As an advocate of the What Works agenda, I think this book really is a wake - up call... A fantastic insight into the potential for using documents in research... Nails twenty years of research in twenty minutes... Worth every dime... Every student in my class (6th form) has been told to buy this book... and it's easy to see why... Shines a great big light on the power of documents in research... Surely this is the best book in its field... First class... I kept referring to this book in my presentation last week and the audience was ecstatic... Education research, usually has little effect on me... Until now... This book is formidable... Crushes the concept that education research is rubbish... fantastic insight... Blows you away with its power and simplicity... Huge reality check, senior school managers at good schools tell the truth, other's don't, won't or can't, and their students suffer.

Arriving in this comments thread rather tardily (I've been super-busy the past few days) to add linkage to Mick Rooney's blog post in response to Author Solutions» «white paper» (which I blogged about in my previous post).

To better understand the features of the genre of the interview essay, let's examine the fundamental features of interview essays, selected for you by the proficient service to take your papers: The facts are evaluated and commented not by the author himself but by others The interview essay writer quotes or retells someone else's opinion, discussions, and conclusions The interviewer Continue reading

... not sure where the above comments re self publishing costing thousands comes from... im delighted with Lulu and it did nt cost me a penny to publish my first book Maggie's Shadow and now available everywhere in print and electronic form... i did all the work myself and when stuck asked for help and Lulu's response was almost immediate and either the following day or the next providing invaluable insight on how to proceed ~ and free... i'm now marketing myself and have already agreed to place my book on consignment at one indie bookshop and with others ive yet to call... my library opened their doors to introduce me as a local writer and the local paper just printed the event... little by little its happening but it requires diligence and a willingness to promote one's work... i learn something new everyday and plan to submit my book to many of the self published contests that are now available... i would recommend Lulu to other authors tired of waiting for an agent

You just mentioned the paper with Wade knowing that someone would comment on the fact that you are not listed as an author hoping to divert attention once again.

Lead author of the paper Nicole Martell - Moran, a veterinary practitioner in a cat - only clinic in Houston, Texas, USA, comments: «The result of this research reinforces my opinion that declawed cats with unwanted behaviours may not be «bad cats», they may simply need pain management.

It's not really a comment blog (although that may just be due to lack of traffic), but the author seems to be doing a thorough job of keeping abreast of the field via regular posts on significant new papers, media coverage, conferences, etc..

(smile) Watch the videos, watch them again, read the papers associated with this topic, see the comment made by the author of the UP Stream Project to me on the link provided....

3) Judith Curry says she provided very critical comments for the new paper and declined to be an author (the prime concern, and that of William Connolley, being that curve fitting alone is nowhere near sufficient for attribution).

It's always advisable to read the paper first, but the authors public comments are informative, too:

Authors are advised to follow the discussion of their paper and to notify the handling editor in case of abusive comments; other participants of the interactive discussion are also invited to indicate abusive commenting to the editorial office.

[7:23 p.m. Updated David L. Smith, an associate professor at the Emerging Pathogens Institute of the University of Florida, visiting scholar at Resources for the Future and an author of the Nature paper, weighed in with a strong defense of the paper in a comment, which I've reproduced as a separate document for easier reading.

The author of the paper I quoted in my comment 61 «Scaffeta» replies directly and extensively to Rasmus» criticism.

Comparing the clarifications made by the authors of the Science paper with the paper itself, related news releases and the authors» comments in news reports, Roger A. Pielke, Jr., of the University of Colorado posted a tough critique tonight of what he called the authors» (and National Science Foundation's) «gross misrepresentation of the findings» and the credulous reporting that amplified the misrepresentations.

Circulation of unpublished papers and a system for submitting comments about them allow authors to discover errors and shortcomings, to collect suggestions for improvement, and to have early warning about dissenting views.

Dikran Marsupial — Having a forum where the comment could be written collaboratively in the open, where the author of the original paper could engage with the process,...

Having a forum where the comment could be written collaboratively in the open, where the author of the original paper could engage with the process, would avoid duplication of effort and for papers on contentious topics (such as climate change) demonstrate that the comment paper was scientifically motivated and that the original author had been given an opportunity to put forward their objections before the comment were submitted.

iv) GRL has a policy that it does not accept comments on published papers; rather, if an author has something substantive to say they should submit a stand alone paper.

I have established the relevence (and the paper's authors have concurred with my explanation in the comments of the post) here.

The other features — already mentioned — were the identification of dominant regional concerns, the highlighting of climate change impacts already occurring, and the report's effectiveness as an engagement tool, which Mooney had just commented on, plus one more thing: the focus on extreme events, which are both most noticeable by the public and the primary source of economic damage in the next several decades, as Dr. Michael Hanemann (author of this paper) explained to me for a story I wrote about the California drought.

Oh... and I thought the Volokh comments on your paper were reasonable and author quite bright and logical.

KE Research GmbH, a German public policy consultancy firm, prepared the report based on interviews and editing assistance from noted German theoretical physicists Ralf D. Tscheuschner & Gerhard Gerlich, authors of the peer - reviewed paper Falsification of the Atmospheric CO2 Greenhouse Effects within the Frame of Physics, and numerous other German climatologists, physicists, and scientists — I'd be interested to hear comments http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2010/06/rescue-from-climate-saviors.html

Now Eli, to be sure, really doesn't know what is going on between Richard Muller and Judy Curry, but this he does know, Judy is listed as an author on all of the five Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature papers, and the papers have been submitted for review (given some of the comments at places like Tamino and Real Climate, they are going to be improved before published).