Sentences with phrase «authored papers submitted»

Not exact matches

The authors are submitting the paper, which builds on previous studies testing artificial intelligence, for further review at an upcoming AI conference.

Although I have only been a postdoc for a little over a year, my first paper (a first - author paper), was accepted this past September and another paper was recently submitted.

These policies spell out the rights and responsibilities that authors agree to when submitting and publishing their papers.

Authors should familiarize themselves with the overall editorial policies for the Science Journals before submitting their paper.

Preregistration of studies If the study that is submitted to a Science Journal for publication was preregistered, such as at the Center for Open Science's Open Science Framework or ClinicalTrials.gov, authors should provide a link to the registration of the study upon submission of the paper to a Science Journal.

Copies of any papers by any subset of the authors that are related to the submitted manuscript and are under consideration or in press at other journals must be included with the submission of the original and / or revised version of the paper.

For example, more than 20 % (38 of 186) of authors who submitted papers from Bulgaria were flagged, more than eight times the proportion from New Zealand (five of 207).

(The authors declined to comment because the paper has been submitted to a peer - reviewed journal.)

The paper's corresponding author, Karim Nayernia, told ScienceInsider that the copied text was part of an old version of the paper, which the first author, a postdoc named Jae Ho Lee, mistakenly submitted.

They submitted papers to peer - reviewed journals at a 23 % higher rate, first - author papers at a 30 % higher rate, and grant proposals at a 25 % higher rate than those without written plans.

Examining the peer - review process for every paper submitted to Functional Ecology between January 2004 and June 2014, authors Charles W. Fox and C. Sean Burns of the University of Kentucky in Lexington and Jennifer A. Meyer of the British Ecological Society in London, United Kingdom, which publishes the journal, found that most of the Functional Ecology reviewers were men, but female reviewers became more numerous over the period studied.

He recalls discussing revisions of the paper with Nemeroff, the lead author, after it was submitted.

«An author (later confirmed to be an innocent party) contacted SAGE after receiving two suspicious e-mails from individuals related to a paper he had submitted to JVC.»

More worryingly, about one out of every 1000 of the submitting authors copied the equivalent of a paragraph's worth of text from other people's papers without citing them.

«In the majority of these papers «preferred reviewers» only were used,» Sherman says, referring to an option made available to SAGE authors when they submit papers.

It shows only the incidence of flagged authors for the 57 nations with at least 100 submitted papers, to minimize distortion from small sample sizes.

Those flagged papers came from 6 % (6737) of the submitting authors.

The program sent each author an e-mail asking whether the paper had been submitted previously to a different journal, and if so, the name of that journal.

But for a price at some journals, authors now have the option of fast - tracking their submitted papers through an accelerated peer - review process.

With a tweet yesterday, an editor of Scientific Reports, one of Nature Publishing Group's (NPG's) open - access journals, has resigned in a very public protest of NPG's recent decision to allow authors to pay money to expedite peer review of their submitted papers.

Whenever an author submits a paper to arXiv, the author declares his or her country of residence.

The fees are slightly higher if an author joins only when submitting their first paper or when it has been accepted.

This is a laudable goal and I've long been a huge fan of interdisciplinary work, and smart authors try to check things out with an appropriate mix before they submit a paper.

A paper describing the newly confirmed observation, «GW170608: Observation of a 19 - solar - mass binary black hole coalescence,» authored by the LIGO Scientific Collaboration and the Virgo Collaboration has been submitted to The Astrophysical Journal Letters and is available to read on the arXiv.

All in all, the decision - making process can take from several months to a year, and if the paper is ultimately rejected, the authors have to submit it afresh to another journal.

The journals have no problem with authors submitting their papers to them and uploading them to a platform simultaneously.

To help support the reproducibility for research results, ACSAC encourages authors of accepted papers to submit software they have developed and datasets they have used to perform their research and make them publicly available to the entire community.

Authors are encouraged to devise and to submit supplemental digital material that will accompany papers prepared for the Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America (BSSA) and for Seismological Research Letters (SRL).

For one, the author submitted the paper using a Yahoo email address.

Just a quick reply to EC concerning supp info at Nature journals, including Nature Chemistry (where I work)-- from our guide - to - authors: «Please note that modification of Supplementary Information after the paper is published requires a formal correction, so authors are encouraged to check their Supplementary Information carefully before submitting the final version.»

January 31, 2018 Extended Abstract Submission Deadline February 5, 2018 Full Papers Submission Deadline February 20, 2018 Authors Notification of Abstract Acceptance (abstracts submitted from December 20 to January 31) March 5, 2018 Notification of full paper acceptance March 15, 2018 Registration fee payment deadline for inclusion of the abstract / full paper in the Programme and in the Book of Abstracts / Proceedings

Authors of these abstracts will not be allowed to submit full papers.

Declaration form the following declaration signed by all the authors of the paper must be submitted to the medical journal of malaysia before the paper can be published.

Prospective authors are invited to submit full papers including results, figures and references.

If you want any particular source to be used in your research paper, you can submit it and the author will discuss it.

... not sure where the above comments re self publishing costing thousands comes from... im delighted with Lulu and it did nt cost me a penny to publish my first book Maggie's Shadow and now available everywhere in print and electronic form... i did all the work myself and when stuck asked for help and Lulu's response was almost immediate and either the following day or the next providing invaluable insight on how to proceed ~ and free... i'm now marketing myself and have already agreed to place my book on consignment at one indie bookshop and with others ive yet to call... my library opened their doors to introduce me as a local writer and the local paper just printed the event... little by little its happening but it requires diligence and a willingness to promote one's work... i learn something new everyday and plan to submit my book to many of the self published contests that are now available... i would recommend Lulu to other authors tired of waiting for an agent

Not too long ago, authors attempting to secure a book deal with traditional publishers had to compose a pitch letter, find a literary agent who would submit a paper manuscript, only to endure the endless time lags associated with a lengthy review process.

Visit the JSAP home page for author guidelines and to submit a paper.

The glaring problem, amid many broader problems, was that Jyrki Kauppinen is not one of the paper's 63 authors, as I noted in an item I submitted to Mediabugs, a Web site devoted to correcting errors in media reports of all kinds.

The issue isn't just that no reviewers check the work... the blog author is unlikely to do even close to the amount of research and analysis nor give the wording nearly the same level of consideration as is expected in a paper submitted to a high quality peer reviewed journal.

As a result, authors submitting to GPC will no longer be able to suggest reviewers, and all papers will include the name of the editor that dealt with them.

Soon's website indicates that a very similar paper had been submitted as a normal paper at least once before (in 2003, with only Dyck and Soon as authors).

Circulation of unpublished papers and a system for submitting comments about them allow authors to discover errors and shortcomings, to collect suggestions for improvement, and to have early warning about dissenting views.

Having a forum where the comment could be written collaboratively in the open, where the author of the original paper could engage with the process, would avoid duplication of effort and for papers on contentious topics (such as climate change) demonstrate that the comment paper was scientifically motivated and that the original author had been given an opportunity to put forward their objections before the comment were submitted.

iv) GRL has a policy that it does not accept comments on published papers; rather, if an author has something substantive to say they should submit a stand alone paper.

The fast response of the GISS authors of both papers in investigating this matter, submitting corrections and updating the data on the GISS website, is to be commended, as is the provision of extensive forcing and other data on the GISS website.

One bad effect of the timetable approach leads authors to submit papers that are incomplete, just to make the deadline, even to the point of giving a conclusion that represents subordinate parts of the work but deals ineffectively with what might have been a good advance in the main conclusion, had they reached it.

Now Eli, to be sure, really doesn't know what is going on between Richard Muller and Judy Curry, but this he does know, Judy is listed as an author on all of the five Berkeley Earth Surface Temperature papers, and the papers have been submitted for review (given some of the comments at places like Tamino and Real Climate, they are going to be improved before published).

This was before the author could possibly respond to any comments from the organization where he submitted the paper, and was done entirely without the permission of the author!

What a pity the authors didn't take that approach before submitting the paper with this scheme to the journal: https://judithcurry.com/2012/08/24/a-modest-proposal-for-sequestration-of-co2-in-the-antarctic