There is much in it that the evangelical should take seriously and yet it is characterized by what seems a perverse refusal to accept
the authoritative Biblical witness without first subjecting it to existentialist and other historically conditioned mutations.
Not exact matches
Such a theological and ecclesiological position has a long cultural heritage in Christian tradition, but it must not imperialize
Biblical interpretation by becoming the sole
authoritative stance from which the
Biblical witness is read.
Perhaps evangelicalism's most common argument concerning
Biblical authority runs as follows: If one will grant the general reliability of the New Testament documents as verified historically, then, as the Holy Spirit uses this
witness to create faith in Christ as Lord and Savior, the Christian comes to accept Jesus Christ as
authoritative.