Not exact matches
This led Luther eventually to conclude that the Roman Church was irrevocably committed to the claim that the
authority of the pope stood even above Holy
Scripture and it was in this context that he came,
over the next several years, to believe that the papacy was the prophesied Antichrist of the last days, a conviction he then held to his dying day with a literalistic fervor that his modern interpreters have rarely been willing to take as seriously as he did.
On the level of
authority, the
Scripture is set
over against reason and tradition (understood both ecclesiastically and as the cumulative and collected wisdom of personal experience).
Read
scripture out loud and proclaim your
authority over them in Jesus's name.
Over the next several centuries, with what Wright considers the gradual loss of the «Israel - dimension» in the church's understanding of itself and its
scriptures, «the notion of scriptural
authority became detached from its narrative context, and thereby isolated from both the fit and the goal of the Kingdom,» according to Wright.
They explained their disagreements
over faith and works, the location of church
authority, the relation of
scripture and tradition, and so on.
• Epistemology or knowledge: God has revealed, through
Scripture and nature, that males are to hold
authority over women the whole of their life.
Jeremy, Under the header «The Failure of the Reformation», line four, shouldn't it read «the
authority of
Scripture over tradition» rather than «the
authority of tradition
over Scripture?»
What our churches are arguing
over, therefore, is not the
authority of
Scripture or confessions but
over those things to which reference must be made when
authority is exercised,
over their correct interpretation, and
over their relative weight in settling disputes.
It is, in particular, the second of evangelicalism's two tenets, i. e., Biblical
authority, that sets evangelicals off from their fellow Christians.8
Over against those wanting to make tradition co-normative with Scripture; over against those wanting to update Christianity by conforming it to the current philosophical trends; over against those who view Biblical authority selectively and dissent from what they find unreasonable; over against those who would understand Biblical authority primarily in terms of its writers» religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events of the faith; over against those who would consider Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affi
Over against those wanting to make tradition co-normative with
Scripture;
over against those wanting to update Christianity by conforming it to the current philosophical trends; over against those who view Biblical authority selectively and dissent from what they find unreasonable; over against those who would understand Biblical authority primarily in terms of its writers» religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events of the faith; over against those who would consider Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affi
over against those wanting to update Christianity by conforming it to the current philosophical trends;
over against those who view Biblical authority selectively and dissent from what they find unreasonable; over against those who would understand Biblical authority primarily in terms of its writers» religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events of the faith; over against those who would consider Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affi
over against those who view Biblical
authority selectively and dissent from what they find unreasonable;
over against those who would understand Biblical authority primarily in terms of its writers» religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events of the faith; over against those who would consider Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affi
over against those who would understand Biblical
authority primarily in terms of its writers» religious sensitivity or their proximity to the primal originating events of the faith;
over against those who would consider Biblical authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source — over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affi
over against those who would consider Biblical
authority subjectively, stressing the effect on the reader, not the quality of the source —
over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affi
over against all these, evangelicals believe the Biblical text as written to be totally authoritative in all that it affirms.
He claims that the Revolution led to an upsurge of biblicism, but explains that only in the case of debates
over colonial bishops and slavery did colonists actually draw directly upon the teaching
authority of
Scripture.
Although evangelicals hold in common to
Scripture's inspiration and
authority, they differ
over the implications of these truths.
First, it is interesting that in the fourth century, the road to Constantinople in 381 is not paved by blunt appeals to church
authority but by extensive wrestling
over biblical texts and fine - tooling of extra-biblical language (most notably the term «hypostasis») in an attempt to establish which exegetical claims made sense of
Scripture as a whole and which fell short.
In Genesis 3, the woman usurped
authority over her husband and took the lead in the Fall, and is now forbidden to do so in the local church by teaching
Scriptures to men.
For example, in the fourth book of Father Paul Sarpi's History of the Council of Trent, you will find that in the year 1551 the Papal legates who presided
over the Council ordered: «That the Divines ought to confirm their opinions with the holy
Scripture, Traditions of the Apostles, sacred and approved Councils, and by the Constitutions and
Authorities of the holy Fathers; that they ought to use brevity, and avoid superfluous and unprofitable questions, and perverse contentions....
All
scripture is given by inspiration of God, and is profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness» 2 Timothy 3:16 KJV It is indisputable that God prohibited all women from teaching — «I do not permit a woman to teach or to have
authority over a man».
I certainly don't doubt God has a purpose for your life, but according to
scripture it does not involve teaching or usurping
authority over men.
When the Declaration later proclaimed that the church must always hear and obey her Lord
over against all other
authorities, it did so in the light of the
scriptures and the communal memory of the church, which gives concrete embodiment to her worship.
I read this article by charisma magazine which i thought was well written which is pro Women preaching http://www.charismamag.com/blogs/fire-in-my-bones/16851-why-i-defend-women-preachers This debate is an on going one John Piper who i respect as a bible preacher believes that
scripture is clear women shouldnt have
authority over men or teach in the church some go as far as saying women shouldnt preach in sunday school if the classes are mixed.Personally i think times are changing and i say that because i have a women manager she has
authority over me and other men so if we follow the biblical example i shouldnt allow myself to be in that situation which is just crazy thinking.
I am just happy to know that I can have a conversation / share insight with a man about
scripture and that is not teaching or having
authority over him.
In other places in
Scripture we see women teaching and having
authority over men.
Here we find at the beginning the new set
over against the old in strong antitheses, in a peculiar interpretation of the Old Testament which evidently aims to establish its true meaning as against the scribal interpretation, thus completely destroying, as we have before observed, the formal
authority of
Scripture.
If we are not united
over Scripture as the final
authority, then we are not united.
Given my own commitments to the primacy of
Scripture over tradition or reason, you can imagine my surprise, as a cautious and, hopefully, careful exegete, to discover in the
Scripture that tradition has
authority.
Within each, he traces how Reformation battles
over the criteria for determining the true meaning of
Scripture and the proper definition of doctrines shifted
authority to natural science, politically ordered confessional institutions, privatized choice, material aggrandizement, and a social - knowledge system finally untethered to religious categories and rationales.
Also, in the Protestant Evangelical world we put a great degree of
authority on
Scripture and, therefore, those who abuse often distort
Scripture in order to gain access, control, and silence
over victims and their families.
On these and many other issues related to
authority and ecclesiology, the way forward is not to smudge
over deep differences that remain between the two traditions but rather to acknowledge them openly and to continue to struggle
over them together in prayer and in fresh engagement with the
Scriptures.