Refining this further based on the statement, the question is something like how do the exam results or Ofsted performance of academies and local
authority schools compare?
Not exact matches
Evidence on the performance of academies
compared to local
authority schools is mixed, but on the whole suggests there is no substantial difference in performance.
An overwhelming majority of Tory members (84 %) believe that
schools should teach children to obey
authority,
compared with 31 % of Labour members and 38 % of SNP and Lib Dem members.
Indeed, every single one of the
schools Lord Harris has taken over gets at least an additional twenty per cent or more young people to pass five good GCSEs
compared to the record when the Local
Authority ran it.
In some places, Catholic
schools must participate in these, usually as a condition of receiving students with vouchers; in a handful of places, diocesan
authorities have willingly joined in, but nobody would say there's been a great rush by Catholic
schools to be
compared — with charter
schools, with district
schools, with other private
schools, even with each other — on the basis of academic achievement.
But after changes to the way writing was assessed in 2016, unions raised concerns that the local
authorities» expectations of the assessments varied so much that it became unfair to
compare schools.
Not all will have fully appreciated, however, the economies of scale and bigger «clout» that comes with being a part of a local
authority purchaser
compared with those of only one
school on its own.
Alternatively the West Midlands was found to have the least variation between local
authorities, but still has some striking differences, with 13 per cent of
schools being academies in Cheshire West and Chester
compared to 48 per cent in Stoke on Trent.
The dysfunctional nature of how urban
schools teach students to relate to
authority begins in kindergarten and continues through the primary grades.With young children, authoritarian, directive teaching that relies on simplistic external rewards still works to control students.But as children mature and grow in size they become more aware that the
school's coercive measures are not really hurtful (as
compared to what they deal with outside of
school) and the directive, behavior modification methods practiced in primary grades lose their power to control.Indeed,
school authority becomes counterproductive.From upper elementary grades upward students know very well that it is beyond the power of
school authorities to inflict any real hurt.External controls do not teach students to want to learn; they teach the reverse.The net effect of this situation is that urban
schools teach poverty students that relating to
authority is a kind of game.And the deepest, most pervasive learnings that result from this game are that
school authority is toothless and out of touch with their lives.What
school authority represents to urban youth is «what they think they need to do to keep their
school running.»
SchoolDash created a sample of secondary academies and local
authority schools with similar characteristics to see how their exam results
compare.
Free
schools have triple the number of unqualified teachers in their classrooms
compared to local
authority - maintained
schools.
That
compares to only seven per cent of inadequate secondary
schools that stayed with their local
authority.
When MATs are
compared to SATs and Local
Authorities (LAs) in terms of financial efficiencies, research has shown that LA
schools spend slightly more per pupil on running expenses than both SATs and MATs, but MAT
schools spend more on teaching staff, supply staff and support staff.
The difference between MATs and local
authority schools was more pronounced at secondary
school level, with a # 49 saving on running expenses for those in MATs
compared to in a local
authority school.
There was a saving of # 6 per pupil for primary
schools on running expenses when they were in a multi-academy trust,
compared to being with their local
authority.
Schools in multi-academy trusts spend less on «back office» costs and more on primary teaching staff, compared to standalone academies and local authority s
Schools in multi-academy trusts spend less on «back office» costs and more on primary teaching staff,
compared to standalone academies and local
authority schoolsschools.
Free
schools are, incidentally, by far the biggest employers of unqualified teachers — 19 per cent of their teachers have no recognised training qualification according to the 2014
School Workforce and
School Characteristics datasets,
compared to less than 3 per cent in local
authority schools.
The DfE said there are 41 local
authority schools that have been in special measures for more than 18 months,
compared to just nine academies.
«That
compares with the years and even decades of neglect many
schools suffered under local
authority control.»
There are minimal differences in outcomes at academies
compared to local
authority maintained
schools — although, overall, LA maintained
schools performed slightly better — by 1 per cent across almost all areas.
Press Association analysis of Department for Education (DfE) data, shows that last year, 80 out of 151 local councils (53 %) saw a drop in the proportion of pupils given their first choice of secondary
school,
compared with the year before, while 68
authorities (45 %) saw a fall in the percentage given one of their overall preferences.
teachers in academies were more likely to have been denied progression than teachers in local
authority schools (23 %
compared to 17 %); and
An 11 % decrease in exclusions from local
authority schools was recorded - there were 26,844 cases in 2010 - 11
compared with 30,211 in 2009 - 10.
Schools and Local
Authorities must take reasonable steps to make sure that disabled pupils, including children who are not yet at
school and in some cases former pupils, are not put at a substantial disadvantage
compared with a non-disabled pupil.