Sentences with phrase «authors i know write»

An author I know wrote and self published an urban fiction book through createSpace.

Most authors I know write some consistent theme.

Not exact matches

Past Godin interns are a hall - of - fame lineup unto themselves, including bestselling authors Ramit Sethi (of I Will Teach You to Be Rich fame) and Michael Parrish DuDell, who wrote Shark Tank: Jump Start Your Business; Harper Reed, chief technology officer for Barack Obama's 2012 re-election campaign and, before that, CTO of the popular online startup Threadless; and well - known crowdfunding expert Clay Hebert.

No, the real reason to write a book is because there is something you have to explore that you think readers want to learn about, not because you think putting «author» on your LinkedIn profile is smart.

«We already know how to reduce sexual harassment at work, and the answer is actually pretty simple: Hire and promote more women,» write the authors.

Dan Betts, author of the Employee Termination Guidebook, writes that even if you don't tell an employee directly that they're under review, they likely already know they're «on the bubble» and could be fired.

As an author, I know that with every book I write I learn more about myself, both my strengths and my weaknesses.

American author Jack London is perhaps best known for writing The Call of the Wild.

«The last lawyer working on it does now know what the first one worked out», the author, and friend of Ingvar Kamprad, Bertil Torekull wrote in his book «Historien om IKEA», first published in 1998.

No matter the rules, «the tremendous profit motive remains,» the authors of the report wrote, «and many will skirt the law to profit from the most vulnerable and economically distressed.»

«Trump's appetite seems to know no bounds when it comes to McDonald's,» the authors write in an excerpt of the book pre-published in The Washington Post.

But there's one easy, important thing you can do to settle in and become efficient in your new role, writes John D. Spooner, author of «No One Ever Told Us That: Money And Life Lessons For Young Adults»: Take an experienced employee out to eat.

The well known New York Times columnist, best selling author and pundit Thomas Friedman wrote a very bullish article on gig work last week.

And the interview author had no idea that a piece was being written on yield curves, or he didn't know that his subject had published on the subject three decades ago.

How much easier would it be to have multiple bloggers and authors if everyone knew who they were writing for and who would be consuming their content?

If you search for the phrase «social media and SEO» you'll still be inundated with quite a few «low authority» websites that have been written by authors who know how to max out their search rankings without necessarily gaining an organic following based on their expertise.

The late Peter L. Bernstein, author of «Against the Gods: The Remarkable Story of Risk,» wrote that risk means we don't know what will happen.

blacks must have their own Bibles written by unknown Authors, therefore they have position of their own, not known to whites.

Those words were written by mere mortals no smarter than you or I. Anything Jesus said in the bible is strictly hearsay as the authors who wrote about Jesus never knew him, saw him or talked to him.

Was it written to portray a god as a real enti ty or was it intended by the author to be a fictional story: Bible (God): yes — was written as a non fiction book Odyssey (Zeus): no - intended to be fiction by the author

I quote: The 27 New Testament books claim to be written by authors who either knew Jesus or received firsthand knowledge of him from others.

In The Wisdom of Stability, author Jonathan Wilson - Hartgrove writes, «Life with the God we know in Jesus Christ is lived in community with other people.

Reading articles like this is so painful because it is so obvious the author knows nothing about any of the religions he's writing on.

Someone long after the alleged Jesus man was dead wrote that and even YOU don't know the author.

I was told that is not how it works, one author told me «I know what you think from your writing and now I will say what I think.»

In fact, the authors of those New Testament texts were undoubtedly drawing from very similar instructions written by Aristotle, Philo and Josephus, known well throughout the Greco - Roman world.

All of these things were going to happen no matter what, but God took the blame for all of them by inspiring the biblical authors to write what they did about Him.

As a seminary professor and author of careful, nuanced theological arguments (such as the classic Knowing God), he lacked the tract - writing flair of his peer Stott.

justpro86 We don't know who actually wrote the gospel known as John and, even if we did, you'd have to take his word that he's not being an unreliable author.

I honestly and truly try my absolute hardest to always reference and footnote and give credit to other authors, thinkers, writers, bloggers, and theologians when I know that what I am writing originated with them.

You know, this author wrote a thoughtful, balanced article, but many of the «comments» I have read so far are short on substance and heavy on cynicism.

He did not even know Isaiah was written by three distinct groups of authors.

Evidence that Demands a Verdict not only provides a good basis for helping us know how we can trust that the Bible we have today is the Bible that was written by the original authors, but also shows how we can trust the historical claims of the Bible.

Second, for someone who is so uptight as this author about knowing religions and even writing a book about it, the mere fact that not ONCE in this article did you use the official and correct name of the church of Jesus Christ of latter day saints (aka Mormon) in my mind completely discredits your temper tantrum.

The rest of the scholars say that it is almost absolutely certain that the original author and audience knew of these accounts and was writing some sort of theological polemic against them.

Yet authors Martin Robinson and Dan Yarnell write in Celebrating the Small Church: «It is unlikely the activity of a few larger churches, no matter how creative they might be, will be enough to meet the missionary challenge of our age.

Another well - known pastor and author writes similarly that «the proof of salvation is not listening to the Word, or having a quick emotional response to the Word, or even cultivating the Word so that it grows into life.

All holy book scriptures have been subjected to the views of given authors — which is no different than a modern - day biography — and, at best, should be used to guide one's decisions — much like a fable written for children.

I often find myself reading some book by some other author, and they reference Wink's trilogy, and I think, «I didn't know he wrote about that!»

@jf well your information about the New Testament is about as accurate as your Old Testament knowledge, The prophecies of the Old testament concerning Christ could not have been written after the fact because we now have the Dead Sea Scrolls, with an almost complete Old Testament dated 100 - 200 years before the birth of Christ, Your interpretation of God at His worst shows a complete lack of understanding as to what was being communicated.We don't know what the original texts of the New Testament were written in as to date there are no original copies available.Greek was the common language of the day.Most of the gospels were reported written somewhere in the 30 year after Christs resurrection time frame, not the unspecified «long after «you reference and three of the authors knew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes&raknew Jesus personally in His earthly ministry, the other Knew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes&raKnew Jesus as his savior and was in the company of many who also knew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes&raknew Jesus.You keep referencing changes, «gazillion «was the word used but you never referenced one change, so it is assumed we are to take your word for it.What may we ask are your credentials?Try reading Job your own self, particularly the section were Job says «My ears had heard of you but now my eyes have seen you.Therefore I despise myself and repent in dust and ashes»

«16 Another who knew Mrs. Eddy personally writes: «Perhaps we sometimes read Science and Health without a thought of the author.

My case was one in which the author, editor and reader are all known entities (in fact, they all know each other personally); the reading takes place in the exact same cultural and social context as the writing and editing; and the reader is himself a really smart guy, Ivy - league Ph.D. and all, who had spent a decade training the editor to be a certain kind of editor, with specific tools unique to the specific publication's aims.

On the other hand, the fact that in writing (unlike in speech) an author's presence is unnecessary means that the author is no longer able to control interpretation.

No greater words on this subject have ever been written than Paul's in I Corinthians 15, while the author of the Fourth Gospel cites in Jesus» farewell message great promises of peace and joy in God's eternal kingdom.

The Bible is a «symposium» of works by a number of persons, composed of many writings, written over a period of hundreds of years, some only preserved in fragments, by unknown authors, written on animal skins (for they had no paper as we know it), with no printing presses to preserve the writing... It's a marvel we have the Bible at all.

Knowing things like the parallelism of Hebrew poetry, the ancient letter form, and the characteristics of apocalyptic literature would help us receive the books that biblical authors actually wrote.

If you are reading a book written by the all - powerful, all - knowing, all - loving creator of the universe, wouldn't you expect to be stunned by the brilliance, the clarity and the wisdom of the author?

Growing out of a series of books and essays Kekes has written over the last several years - on the nature of moral argument, the problem of evil, and the conflictual goods and evils that make up life as we know it - Against Liberalism marks the author's most explicit broadside against liberal theory to date.

In 13:3 - 35 the author writes that «Jesus, knowing... that he had come from God and was going to God... girded himself with a towel... and began to wash the disciples» feet.»

But I do think that it is strange to seek after the Spirit of God in the works of authors other than the one book we know the Spirit wrote... why do that?