Sentences with phrase «authors discussed the results»

Writing in the International Journal of Technology Marketing, the authors discuss the resulting controversies associated with existing intellectual property rights, and suggest that the future can only bring conflict if such legislation is not changed.

The test cell was designed by U.M.. All authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript.

M.T., L.M. and H.G.A. conceived and designed the study; M.T., L.M. and A.H. developed methodology; M.T., L.M., A.H., L.S., N.G., S.S., T.R., Z.H., K.S., J.H., S.H., A.B. and K.S. performed experiments and acquired data; M.T., L.M., A.H., K.S. and H.G.A. analysed and interpreted data; M.T., L.M., K.S. and H.G.A. wrote the manuscript; all authors discussed the results and commented on the manuscript; K.S. and H.G.A. supervised the study.

The authors discussed the results of the first field trial and and their hopes for the future of this approach.

All authors discussed the results and commented on the paper.

All authors discussed the result and commented on the manuscript.

No attempt was made to figure out how closely the Howey model hews to reality, but the authors discuss the results as if they were reality instead of a model.

Not exact matches

The three authors, however, never discuss these ideas; as a result, disciplines whose focus is not medical / psychiatric are being sold a shoddy bit of goods.

Two authors of the study, Cynthia Kupper, CEO of the Gluten Intolerance Group and a registered dietitian diagnosed with celiac disease, and Laura Allred, Ph.D. and GIG's Regulatory and Standards Manager, join Jules on the show to discuss the impetus for the study, how the study was conducted, study results and what this means for celiacs and others sensitive to gluten as they search for safe gluten free products.

As a result, Comstock said, while the authors discuss the possibility of under - reporting in other studies, she was «more concerned with over-reporting in this study.»

«Mothers who don't discuss their results with their kids are relatively less satisfied and feel more conflicted,» says Kenneth Tercyak, director of behavioral prevention research at Georgetown Lombardi and lead author of the study published in the journal Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention.

Dr. Amy Tuteur, author of Push Back: Guilt in the Age of Natural Parenting, discusses the guilt mother's feel as a result of the natural childbirth movement.

Discussing the possible reasons for the results, the authors say: «The mechanisms underlying this interaction are unclear.

The results of this research are discussed in an article published in Nature Photonics by researcher and lead author Riad Nechache.

For instance, when we share resources, we first agree upon proper handling procedures and schedule times for resource access; when we share personnel, we decide at the outset how much time they will dedicate to each project; and when we start new projects, we discuss and agree upon the appropriate author sequence for any resulting papers.

Dr. Michael Mosley, New York Times bestselling author of the Fast Diet, discusses the difference between short term crash dieting and the sustainable results from «a planned approach to eating» (The 8 - Week Blood Sugar Diet, pg.

The author is not responsible for any adverse effects or consequences resulting from the use of any of the suggestions, preparations or procedures discussed in this blog.

Dr Sue Thomson, ACER Director of Educational Monitoring and Research and lead author of the report, joins me to discuss the results.

I sat down with Dr Sue Thomson, Director of Educational Monitoring and Research at ACER and the report's lead author to discuss the results.

In this essay author Marguerite Roza challenges the assumption that rural districts are less productive than their urban or suburban peers by discussing rural districts can «beat the odds» by increasing student results without increasing per - pupil expenditures.

Last year, GCI drew attention to the approximately $ 70 million to $ 80 million annual loss in tax revenue resulting from dramatic reductions in DOR staff as discussed in the policy paper Enhanced Revenue Enforcement Creates Fairness, Raises Millions in Revenue, authored by former Arizona DoR Director Elliott Hibbs for the Grand Canyon Institute.

Penny Sansevieri of Author Marketing Experts joined Jim and Bryan to discuss the results of last week's March to a Bestseller 2 event.

Jonny from Author Platform Rocket joined the guys to discuss Bryan's results with his service.

Ingram's Director of Digital Products joins us to discuss why book metadata is so important to book discovery and book sales and to offer metadata tips authors can apply to start improving their book's search results today.

Author Martha Conway discusses optimizing Facebook ad settings to ensure a realistic click - through rate, and her overall results with Facebook ads.

In light of the WHSmith / Kobo incident (resulting in the knee jerk removal of thousands of self published titles, Orna Ross speaks out for indie authors on BBC Radio 4 ′ s PM Programme, discussing how and when self - publishing works.

In this very informative interview, Facebook advertising success story and author Mark Dawson discusses how Amazon Affiliate links, which could allow you to monitor those results, are not allowed in this circumstance.

There are likely a number of unidentified / not thoroughly discussed reasons why hybrid authors appear to be selling more books than are self - published authors (based on the results of this study).

Thanks for checking out The Author Biz podcast, where we discuss meaningful ways to get better results with your author busAuthor Biz podcast, where we discuss meaningful ways to get better results with your author busauthor business.

As a matter of background, Sexton will also discuss the results from an earlier survey of all authors that show just how advanced hybrid authors are.

Although Amazon has never been mentioned in Smashwords» press release, authors took to The Passive Voice's comment and discussed extensively how sales results may vary depending on the author's relationship with Amazon's conditional KDP Select offer.

In my previous post about Amazon's KDP, Indie Authors — Latest KDP Results, I discussed my endeavors in giving away books.

The authors discuss some possible reasons for this finding and acknowledge that we don't have enough information yet to know if this is a real effect vs. a statistical fluke of some kind, but it's not the first study to show similar results.

I can't claim to be a whiz at statistics but I remember telling some skeptics on another forum, Accuweather / climate change I believe, that the major point and problem with this paper were that the results still showed a «hockey stick» indicating current warming was pretty anomalous and that the authors were not climatologists, nor did they seem to consult any to discuss why certain methods were used over the ones they decided to use.

It has been discussed also more widely, because the authors of many approaches to determine the climate sensitivity wish to split their results to the no - feedback part and to one or more feedback terms.

But of course Lewis wouldn't want to contact the authors if he thought they might say something like «Yeah, we discussed it, and we decided all the sensitivity studies should use similar statistical assumptions» or «On reflection, the choice we made in 2006 seems unwise to us now» or, worse of all, «We don't think they should have changed the analysis, but it doesn't effect our results in any substantial way.»

While there are many issues which can be related to the choice of data set one uses which would be worth discussing, one simply can not claim things about a papers» results are true when they are only true if you use a different data set than the authors of the paper used.

You reference several blog posts by J. Duarte - who seems to feel that the Cook et al authors were dishonest idiots (the paper passed peer review of methods and results by reviewers the editors respected for domain knowledge), that the raters were blinded by ideological bias (totally ignoring the author ratings giving confirming identical results), complaining about raters discussing criteria (when it's essential for everyone to agree on the same critera, clarifying ambiguities - and that radom presentation prevented collusion on any particular item), and in general making truly absurd and unsupported accusations.

For example, in the «Fit for the Principalship» article noted above, the authors discuss achieving transformational results in a school.

In the article, the author discusses changes that may be expected in legal research resulting from the shift in legal research from print based case research to electronic sources.

Providence Commercial Litigation counsel Steve Richard authored this column discussing developments in and results of a court decision regarding a political consultant's First Amendment challenge to South Carolina's anti-robocall statute.

New York City IP Litigation partner Craig Tractenberg authored this column discussing vicarious liability resulting from a car accident involving a food delivery service.

After summarizing the results from two studies the author conducted in Montessori middle schools, the chapter discusses nine characteristics of Montessori education in relation to various theoretical perspectives on education and development.