Sentences with phrase «authors do»

The authors do point out that further research is needed.»
«The authors do not consider the retracted leg,» says Necker.
In addition, the authors do not account for uncertainties in the simple model whose sensitivity is fitted.
Another important point is that there is no specificity to their findings, something the authors do acknowledge in the discussion.
The authors do not give any details regarding the analytical methods used for thiamethoxam in nectar.
In the discussion of their findings, the authors do not discuss the significance and relevance of these findings from a study where bees are directly fed neonicotinoid treated pollen into the hives for 38 days, to effects on free foraging bees under realistic conditions of use.
While the authors do note that further tweaks to the process may be required to remedy the relatively low amount of PLPs produced, this still represent an excellent first step towards the clinical applicability of this therapeutically relevant cell type.
While the authors do not yet know the exact mechanism causing the neurons to stay healthier for longer, this finding could have wide implications.
In their analysis they also in effect compare the amplitudes of two series which have been band - pass filtered in a similar way, and do not provide convincing evidence that they really are related — there are wiggles of similar frequencies, as expected when they have been band - pass filetered, but they do not exhibit a convincing one - to - one correspondence (in neither phase or amplitude), and the authors do not discuss the level of statistical significance.
The authors do point out that perhaps at this point the iPSC may only require a longer time to exert any positive function.
The authors don't believe that this same connection exists between the CAG repeat length in the HD gene and ALS.
The authors don't know yet, Begall said.
The authors don't rule out a minor contribution from some models underestimating cooling from volcanic eruptions.
The authors do not address whether such a small sample size in the low - genetic risk group could influence the results.
The authors do this by calculating how to encode the data in a quantum description of the event horizon, known whimsically as «black hole hair».
Authors don't need to pay a platform or a journal to host their papers or ideas, he says: «All they need do is post it on the Web or deposit it in their institutional repository.»
The authors do not believe that the risk is due to direct infection of the fetus because such infections are typically fatal.
The authors do not believe the viability of moose populations in central Ontario is negatively affected by this predation, as recent studies have shown that populations in WMU49 and nearby Algonquin Provincial Park are increasing and that both adult and calf moose survival is relatively high.
The authors do however urge caution due to the potential impact on yield production which could have implications for regional and global food security.
«The authors do not consider the retracted leg,» says Necker, who has studied flamingos.
Slight problem, however: the cited journal, department and study authors don't exist.
The authors do a fine job of describing the components of the record and explaining the sources of various interpretations.
On a more positive note, the authors do include many interesting examples of building design, both traditional and innovative.
And while the authors do an excellent job of describing what occurred in the decade from its inception to its demise, they stumble when trying to assign blame.
There is one approach to superpartner discovery that the authors do not explore.
The authors do not know why the bryozoans added more magnesium to their skeletons under warmer temperatures.
It's a shame that some of the authors don't even bother to turn up for the session.
The authors do not speculate on whether the layers became mixed through natural sedimentation processes or excavation errors that caused some artifacts to be assigned to the wrong occupation levels.
«The authors do a great job in their analysis.
The authors do not argue that «risky» research is the only science that is worth doing.
In their anatomical reasoning the authors do not explain why so many women don't climax even with sufficient clitoral stimulation — or why some are capable of orgasm in the absence of it.
Still, Larson doesn't think it's fair to call cats «semi-domesticated,» as the authors do in their paper.
While the authors do not condone inducing anxiety in employees to foster high performance, the good news for employees who chronically experience anxiety at work, or who experience it from time to time, is that it can help performance if they can self - regulate their behaviour.
Although the paper suggests that increased gun «exposure» caused the spike in accidental deaths, she says the authors don't grapple with what they mean, precisely, by exposure.
The main goal of a Perspective is to broaden the message of the paper, but often the authors do a great job of extracting the essence of the article for non-specialists at the same time.
In a recent original article in Deutsches Ärzteblatt International, Gisela Schott et al. determine that most guideline authors do declare their conflicts of interest.
The authors do acknowledge some limitations in their paper, specifically that it relied on self - reporting, and that a selection bias may have been caused by pregnant couples being more willing to respond than disappointed couples.
Although the authors do not advocate for sending all orphaned or abandoned children to institutions, «it is not an option that should be taken off the table — and it could be very appropriate for children who don't have another place to go,» Whetten says.
The authors do note that this large study can not definitively prove cause and effect; nonetheless, the findings are strongly consistent with «a wealth of existing observational and clinical trial data to support health benefits of nut consumption on many chronic diseases.»
However, he points out that the authors don't actually test whether social factors or more traditional resource limits keep predator numbers stable over time.
The publisher usually honours such requests, as long as authors do not ask to exclude more than three people or labs, Kiermer says.
However, in the face of divergent and contradicting evidence, the authors do not unequivocally support the single - shooter theory.
Although the authors don't know for sure whether shark numbers have gone up, they speculate that the population could have been boosted by fishing discards before all fishing in the area was banned in 2006.
Also called «honorary,» or «guest,» authors, gift authors don't make a significant contribution (or sometimes any contribution at all) to the paper, Stemwedel says.
The PNAS article authors do not provide a practical strategy for overcoming the dense tangle of vested interests and perverse incentives that protect the current system.
The authors do not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and have disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
In selecting forty dramatic moments the authors do not maintain a running critique but allow the reader to develop their own assessment before offering their editorial judgement in the conclusion.
Despite the lack of language, the donor - conceived authors do not seem confused or maladjusted by the structure of their families.
Is there someplace on this new site where the problem is explained so that all the original authors do get our credit somewhere, even if not on the actual posts?
I love it that the authors don't sneak veggies in — kids don't learn anything about nutrition from that!
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z