Sentences with phrase «authors do try»

But many self - published authors do try to at least break even or bring in some supplemental income from their work.

Not exact matches

What the media has to do now, the authors argue, is not try to fight this alternative ecosystem with better viral content or clickbait, but to «recognize that it is operating in a propaganda and disinformation - rich environment.»

The question then becomes for the people who add value and try to be useful to authors and readers — and that includes publishers and booksellers — how do you evolve being useful in a digital world?

Don't try to make the leap all at once, advises Joanne Cleaver, author of The Career Lattice.

If so, you may be doing something wrong, according to Victor Green, author of How to Succeed in Business by Really Trying, and a serial entrepreneur who's launched several successful companies and spent the past 15 years consulting with other entrepreneurs.

Rubio, a member of the bipartisan Gang of Eight that authored the bill, has furiously tried to blunt the criticism this week, acknowledging concerns that the bill does not go far enough to ensure border security and prevent «amnesty,» an ambiguous but potent fear among opponents of immigration reform.

The New York Times bestselling author and radio show host of The Cardone Zone also talks about how he looks and feels younger than he did 20 years ago — because he stopped trying to please everyone and started living his life for himself.

Or check out author Mike Myatt's five keys to effective workplace conflict resolution (to start with, he says, don't just try to avoid conflict).

The author says they are his friends, which is commendable, but friendship does not explain promoting a book that can only exacerbate the problems of Christians trying to attain moral clarity about human sexuality.

You are the one trying to treat the bible as if it had one author and intent -------------------- It does.

If it doesn't exist why write about it... Many atheist's who are authors inspire Christianity some spending all their time trying to make others deny Christ.

But no one book can cover everything, and perhaps the writer will readily be excused if he, a single author, does not try to say everything that is to be said on any one subject, or even everything that is in his own mind!

Did you know that many of the New Testament letters are actually dialogues between the author and a teacher he is trying to refute?

If it doesn't excist why write about it... Many atheist's who are authors inspire Christianity some spending all thier time trying to make others deny Christ.

i do not know what the author is trying to do but i know from personal experience that stephen king's books have a following of demons behind them.

In the process, we don't even consider what message the «original» author was trying to convey, or what issues their audience was dealing with.

Steve... I think we're floggin» a dead horse here, but for what it's worth, understand that I'm not trying to convince you to think like I do, rather I wd hope that room wd be made for many theological differences.To think discuss and debate theology is well supported by the New Testament and history, and is perfectly within the bounds of what it means to engage our minds with the subject at hand.Theologians and biblical scholars have done this very thing for centuries, revealing a plethora of opinion on the evolving world of biblical studies.Many capable authors have written and debated the common themes as well as the differences between Paul, John, Jesus, the synoptics, etc..

i do not know what the author is trying to do but i know from personal experience that stephen king's books have a following od demons behind them.

Clive, you point out how others often don't understand what Jesus was saying; but while Jesus often labors to try and make things clear to the unbeliever («Oh, you of little faith) or at the very least the author tries to make it clear for us in retrospect (At the time they didn't understand that he spoke of this...), in this case Jesus switches from something that might be figurative to essentially say «no, I seriously mean this» and it concludes not with Jesus saying «don't go away, this is what I actually mean» but confirming that people would refuse to accept that God intended for them to actually fill themselves with the life that He offered so they stopped following him.

And to the author don't let people try to shame you or bash you for thinking outside the box.

In America many Christians who insist on a literal interpretation of anything in the Bible are often ready to say «but, in this case, Jesus didn't really mean...» when both Jesus and the author of this Gospel labor to convey «You aren't supposed to try to take the live of other things on Earth... that's the whole point, I want you to take on life that only I can offer!»

This is not because I am an experienced eBook author (though I did just publish my first eBook), but because I am trying to learn more about the process, and wanted to share what I learn with you.

I tried to do this for the authors of process...

Recognizing this inevitable and permanent tension, it is better not to go through this gospel wondering about the factual historicity of each event as it comes, but rather to devote ourselves to the task of understanding what the author is trying to do and say as he shapes his material and presents his witness.

That being said... While I'm not surprised at the overwhelming number of posts that disagree with the author, (this is CNN.com, after all) I know exactly what the author is trying to say here, but he also did a horrible job articulating it.

In a way, the author is trying to answer the question, «Why do bad things happen to good people?»

fidel, if you truly believe this, these words are so subject, they can be applied any where and any time in history, really, try to be open minded, do you really trust the author of these words?

This does not help us when we try to figure out what a Biblical author is talking about when he writes about «baptism.»

In his effort to state tentatively and in his own way such apparently dawning agreements the author of this essay must employ the method of polar analysis; that is, he must try to do justice to the dynamic character of that social reality, the Church, by defining certain poles between which it moves or which it represents.

The author seems to adhere to a center - left Zionism, though he does try to be fair to Begin and recognizes many of his strengths.

@hippypoet» people you mentioned are those who interpret only» @Chad «So interpretation doesn't seek to understand what the author was trying to say?

You want to let the story of Jonah tell you what the author is trying to say, and the only way to do this is by reading the story in context and reading the story in sequence.

The authors repeatedly wonder if a college always trying to mediate between two poles is deluding itself or is doing a unique thing in higher education.

now, you can try and try to show that indeed, no intelligent person does nt believe in evolution as you have defined it, namely necessarily excluding any external entity To which I would simply point to the scores of scientists who believe in ID / Theistic evolution, also including Francis Collins the leader of the Human Genome Project and the author of «The Language of God: A Scientist Presents Evidence for Belief»

That would be easiest (and what most Christians are trying to do today), but would not make a good ending to the play, and is in fact, not what the author of the play intended.

The author is trying downplay the statistical FACTS that demonstrate over and over these people are brainless nit wits who talk to invisible men in the sky and do what their pastor tells them.

Yet at the same time, if we want to truly understand what the Gospel authors were saying, we need to do our best to let them provide the details they think are important, and try to set aside the rest as nothing more than interesting historical side notes.

So they created this thing called religion to try and marginalize woman and whoever else the author (s) didn't like, gays, atheists, etc..

Why even does this author try to prove her point?

And so now, sadly, the unnamed authors of the accusatory books and articles make themselves look foolish because, for everybody who knows better, the view they are trying to refute doesn't exist!

Try bestselling author Isa Chandra Moskowitz's newest, Isa Does It, for quick and savory dishes, or Fran Costigan's Vegan Chocolate if you've got a sweet tooth.

The recipe author warns to use only Callebaut, but on the first two tries, I stubbornly used Valhrona, an equally high - quality chocolate that apparently is resistant to freezing solid (and the cookie dough did not).

Traditional and authentic, each recipe I've tried has been a success, and the author does a great job putting the recipes in context of the cuisines from which they come.

I'm still trying to find the perfect krumkaker recipe to share with you here, and when I do I'll also try making them in the shape of cups, which cookbook author Astrid Karlsen Scott recommends.

Well, I feel like the authors could of done something better to try and make it more clear what each grain was.

I really tried to match the title with the content of this article but the body of the article does not really support the author's contention that no new DM is needed.

I am just trying to make this post fun as the author wanted to do.

To make matters worse, the authors argue, the media ignores and / or severely criticizes research findings that don't fit the football = dementia narrative, and labels anyone who dares to challenge that narrative or call for further study a «CTE denier» or a «shill» trying to advance their own vested interests, confuse the public and conflate the issues.

If encouraged to get involved in the kitchen, whether it be helping to prepare meals or doing some home baking, this can develop a child's interest in food and encourage them to try different ingredients,» says food and cookery writer Nicola Graimes, the author of «New Vegetarian Kitchen» and several other cookbooks.

«The biggest mistake parents make is trying to do too much on vacation,» says Laura Sutherland, a mother of two and author of five books on family travel, including Tropical Family Vacations.