Sentences with phrase «autocomplete function»

Thus, this chapter argues that, in its Autocomplete function, Google indeed plays a unique role in contributing to defamatory content.

In examining the legal reasoning behind the Hong Kong case of Yeung v Google and German case of RS v Google, and comparing the two, this chapter argues that the orthodox approach to fixing responsibility for defamation, based either on the established English common law notion of publisher or innocent disseminator or the existing categories of passive host, conduit and caching in the relevant European Union Directive, is far from adequate to address the challenges brought about by search engines and their Autocomplete function.

Thus, imposing liability on Google in a defamation action based on its Autocomplete function is justified in a notice - and - takedown regime when a substantive complaint has been made.

Whilst different jurisdictions have yet to reach consensus on search engines» liability for defamation, Internet giant Google is confronting judges and academics with another challenge: the basis of liability for defamation arising from its Autocomplete function.

The premise is simple: two stars are put in a room and faced with questions derived from Google's autocomplete function.

Other good sources for exploring product categories are tools like Google Keyword Planner, Wordstream and even the autocomplete function of Amazon search.

It will also allow people to report inaccurate, misleading or violent content seen in its autocomplete function, which shows suggested searches based off the first words typed into the Google search bar.

Not exact matches

Here is a summary article from Outlaw.com, reviewing the law in the UK and elsewhere as to whether Google's «autocomplete» function for search topics could be defamatory if one or more of the suggested completions for the search term entered had a nasty meaning.