Are lethal
autonomous weapon systems legal?
Not exact matches
She is presently writing a monograph on the
legal, moral and political issues associated with
autonomous weapons systems.
This chapter explores the
legal implications of
autonomous weapon systems and the potential challenges such
systems might present to the laws governing weaponry and the conduct of hostilities.
A second aim of the chapter is to describe the relevant law of armed conflict principles applicable to new
weapon systems, with a particular focus on the unique
legal challenges posed by
autonomous weapons.
The ICRC welcomed the increased attention paid to
autonomous weapons systems with recent discussions of the technological capabilities, military intent, and
legal and ethical issues they raise.
In this regard, we share specific humanitarian, moral and
legal concerns related to ongoing developments on a set of the so - called «new era warfare tools», including proliferation of amed drones, lethal
autonomous weapons system eventual development, cyberspace aggressive use and, finally, risks of militarization of the outer space.
Asaro argues in favour of a ban on
autonomous lethal
weapons systems, based on a foundation of human rights and humanitarian principles that are not only moral, but
legal.
The NDP recognizes that there are a variety of concerns about
autonomous weapons systems including «
legal, practical and ethical questions.»
My delegation considers that the four - day meeting of experts convened by States party to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) in Geneva in May, provided an important opportunity to explore the fundamental
legal, ethical and societal issues raised by one such possible advancement, lethal
autonomous weapon systems.
Lethal
autonomous weapons systems raise very practical technical, ethical,
legal and operational issues.
Non-Aligned Movement — delivered by Indonesia, 8 October NAM is of the view that lethal
autonomous weapons systems (LAWS) raise a number of ethical,
legal, moral and technical, as well as international peace and security related questions which should be thoroughly deliberated and examined in the context of conformity to international law including international humanitarian law and international human rights law.
That effort must neither distract from nor overtake our work here to deal with the real moral,
legal, ethical and security problems associated with
autonomous weapons systems.
... We welcome the constructive ongoing discussions in the CCW on the technical, ethical,
legal, operational and military aspects of lethal
autonomous weapons systems.
Costa Rica (18 October)-- «We must also address the ethical,
legal and technical concerns that have arisen raising with regard to the
systems of lethal
autonomous weapons, which are in our view, contrary to international humanitarian law and international human rights law.
The Campaign to Stop Killer Robots welcomed the interest shown at the meeting in discussing Article 36
legal reviews of new
weapons systems, but noted it is not going to be sufficient for a comprehensive international response to the risks of development of fully
autonomous weapons.
Feb. 6 - 7: US Naval War College holds a workshop on «
legal implications of
autonomous weapons systems» attended by armed forces representatives from the US, Australia, Canada, Israel, and UK
The letter links to a document outlining «research directions that can help maximize the societal benefit of AI» that includes a list of
legal, ethical, and other questions relating to «lethal
autonomous weapons systems,» also known as fully
autonomous weapons or killer robots.
A «food for thought» paper disseminated by the GGE chair with key questions for states contains several technology and
legal / ethical issues that do not directly relate to the issue of lethal
autonomous weapons systems.