Switzerland (8 October) Finally the development of lethal
autonomous weapons systems raises fundamental questions in many respects.
Lethal
autonomous weapons systems raise very practical technical, ethical, legal and operational issues.
Not exact matches
The statement by the global coalition of non-governmental organizations (NGOs) urges Convention on Conventional
Weapons (CCW) states to continue the talks they started in May 2014 on questions
raised by the emerging technology of «lethal
autonomous weapons systems.»
Current technological capabilities and foreseeable developments
raise serious doubts about the ability to use
autonomous weapon systems in compliance with international humanitarian law in all but the narrowest of scenarios and the simplest of environments.
The ICRC welcomed the increased attention paid to
autonomous weapons systems with recent discussions of the technological capabilities, military intent, and legal and ethical issues they
raise.
My delegation considers that the four - day meeting of experts convened by States party to the Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons (CCW) in Geneva in May, provided an important opportunity to explore the fundamental legal, ethical and societal issues
raised by one such possible advancement, lethal
autonomous weapon systems.
Non-Aligned Movement — delivered by Indonesia, 8 October NAM is of the view that lethal
autonomous weapons systems (LAWS)
raise a number of ethical, legal, moral and technical, as well as international peace and security related questions which should be thoroughly deliberated and examined in the context of conformity to international law including international humanitarian law and international human rights law.
After deliberating for two years on questions relating to «lethal
autonomous weapons systems,» the time has come for states to commit to a more substantive process aimed at achieving an outcome that addresses the multiple concerns
raised over the
weapons.
Costa Rica (18 October)-- «We must also address the ethical, legal and technical concerns that have arisen
raising with regard to the
systems of lethal
autonomous weapons, which are in our view, contrary to international humanitarian law and international human rights law.
Concerns over an arms race were
raised several times in the course of the Chatham House conference, which was sponsored by BAE
Systems, manufacturer of the Taranis
autonomous aircraft, the prime example of a UK precursor to
autonomous weapons technology.
After the matter of «lethal
autonomous robots» was first
raised at the Human Rights Council in May 2013, nations agreed in November 2013 to a Convention on Conventional
Weapons (CCW) discussion mandate to address questions relating to the emerging technology of «lethal
autonomous weapons systems.»
According to the report, «several nations are working towards the development of lethal
autonomous weapons systems that can assess information, choose targets and open fire without human intervention» which
raises «new challenges for international law and the protection of noncombatants.»
Throughout the year, Russia objected to the creation of a Group of Governmental Experts,
raising «major doubts» about the need to do so now and arguing that it was «premature» when there is not yet an agreed - upon definition of lethal
autonomous weapons systems.