Sentences with phrase «available as fuel source»

These Ketone bodies are produced when glucose is not available as fuel source.

Not exact matches

Kyoto regulates all sources of carbon dioxide as well as other greenhouse gases, but reliable long - term data by country are available only for carbon dioxide from burning fossil fuels (which accounts for about two - thirds of the human contribution to global warming).

The first layer that is just beneath your skin was the type of fat considered by nutrition scientists to be the first type to be used as a fuel source if food was not available.

The simple SAD fact that carbs / glucose are so readily available and cheap today doesn't mean that we should depend on them as a primary source of fuel or revere them so highly.

During a race a biologically readily available fuel source is MCT's such as found in coconut oil.

Here are the official numbers from the EPA 4x2 F - 150 3.5 L V6: 18 City / 25 Highway / 20 Combined 4x4 F - 150 3.5 L V6: 17 City / 23 Highway / 19 Combined 4x2 F - 150 2.7 L V6 EcoBoost: 19 City / 26 Highway / 22 Combined 4x4 F - 150 2.7 L V6 EcoBoost: 18 City / 23 Highway / 20 Combined 4x2 F - 150 5.0 L V8: 15 City / 22 Highway / 18 Combined 4x4 F - 150 5.0 L V8: 15 City / 21 Highway / 17 Combined 4x2 F - 150 3.5 L V6 EcoBoost: 17 City / 24 Highway / 20 Combined 4x4 F - 150 3.5 L V6 EcoBoost: 17 City / 23 Highway / 19 Combined Source: Ford Press Release is on Page 2 FORD»S BLUEPRINT FOR SUSTAINABILITY ADVANCES TO NEXT LEVEL; NEW F - 150 LINEUP INCLUDES HIGHEST EPA - ESTIMATED FUEL ECONOMY RATINGS AMONG GAS - POWERED PICKUPS The new 2015 F - 150 lineup — featuring the toughest, smartest and most capable F - 150s ever — now includes the highest EPA - estimated fuel economy ratings of any full - size gasoline pickup on the market When equipped with available 2.7 - liter EcoBoost ® engine, new F - 150 4x2 has EPA - estimated 19 mpg City, 26 mpg Highway and 22 mpg Combined fuel economy ratings 2015 F - 150 can tow as much as 1,110 pounds more, haul as much as 530 pounds more, has a 5 percent to 16 percent better power - to - weight ratio and new F - 150 EPA fuel economy ratings are 5 to 29 percent better than current models, depending on engine Ford advances to the next level in providing customers with more fuel - efficient vehicles, as the new 2015 F - 150 lineup includes the highest EPA - estimated fuel economy ratings of any gasoline - powered full - size pickup sold in AmerFUEL ECONOMY RATINGS AMONG GAS - POWERED PICKUPS The new 2015 F - 150 lineup — featuring the toughest, smartest and most capable F - 150s ever — now includes the highest EPA - estimated fuel economy ratings of any full - size gasoline pickup on the market When equipped with available 2.7 - liter EcoBoost ® engine, new F - 150 4x2 has EPA - estimated 19 mpg City, 26 mpg Highway and 22 mpg Combined fuel economy ratings 2015 F - 150 can tow as much as 1,110 pounds more, haul as much as 530 pounds more, has a 5 percent to 16 percent better power - to - weight ratio and new F - 150 EPA fuel economy ratings are 5 to 29 percent better than current models, depending on engine Ford advances to the next level in providing customers with more fuel - efficient vehicles, as the new 2015 F - 150 lineup includes the highest EPA - estimated fuel economy ratings of any gasoline - powered full - size pickup sold in Amerfuel economy ratings of any full - size gasoline pickup on the market When equipped with available 2.7 - liter EcoBoost ® engine, new F - 150 4x2 has EPA - estimated 19 mpg City, 26 mpg Highway and 22 mpg Combined fuel economy ratings 2015 F - 150 can tow as much as 1,110 pounds more, haul as much as 530 pounds more, has a 5 percent to 16 percent better power - to - weight ratio and new F - 150 EPA fuel economy ratings are 5 to 29 percent better than current models, depending on engine Ford advances to the next level in providing customers with more fuel - efficient vehicles, as the new 2015 F - 150 lineup includes the highest EPA - estimated fuel economy ratings of any gasoline - powered full - size pickup sold in Amerfuel economy ratings 2015 F - 150 can tow as much as 1,110 pounds more, haul as much as 530 pounds more, has a 5 percent to 16 percent better power - to - weight ratio and new F - 150 EPA fuel economy ratings are 5 to 29 percent better than current models, depending on engine Ford advances to the next level in providing customers with more fuel - efficient vehicles, as the new 2015 F - 150 lineup includes the highest EPA - estimated fuel economy ratings of any gasoline - powered full - size pickup sold in Amerfuel economy ratings are 5 to 29 percent better than current models, depending on engine Ford advances to the next level in providing customers with more fuel - efficient vehicles, as the new 2015 F - 150 lineup includes the highest EPA - estimated fuel economy ratings of any gasoline - powered full - size pickup sold in Amerfuel - efficient vehicles, as the new 2015 F - 150 lineup includes the highest EPA - estimated fuel economy ratings of any gasoline - powered full - size pickup sold in Amerfuel economy ratings of any gasoline - powered full - size pickup sold in America.

Were cost - effective CDR solutions available at large scale, however, developing countries could continue to rely on fossil fuel energy sources until the business case for renewable energy improved, so long as CDR were deployed to offset fossil emissions associated with this transition.

As the western world depends on there continuing to be a good supply of fossil fuels from the Middle East and other parts of the developing world, there will always be a necessity to plan for all eventualities in this area (NOTE — I know the US purchases relatively little of its oil from the ME, but if this was not available there would be more competition for supplies from other sources).

A look at the possible solutions available to end the world's reliance on fossil fuels as a source of energy.

Plug - in hybrids are also available, running on rechargeable internal batteries with gas as a backup fuel source.

ARB is analyzing what low - CI fuels are likely to be available for compliance by 2020 as well as the 2030 timeframe, based on industry, academic, and government sources.

The reduction in emissions of carbon dioxide per new unit of non-hydro «renewable» capacity falls off rapidly as additional «renewable» capacity is added to an electric grid because additional fossil fuel sources must be kept in «spinning reserve» in case the wind dies or the sun goes under a cloud unless hydro is available.

There is the «business as usual» case that assumes 4 degrees of global warming is inevitable, so we should use the cheapest and most plentiful energy sources available regardless of the fact that burning these fuels will raise atmospheric greenhouse gas concentrations 40 percent higher than current levels.

The worksheets available below constitute the details each entity's production of oil & NGLs, natural gas, coal, and cement from as early as 1854 to 2010, as well as additional sources of emissions (such as vented CO2, flared CO2, own fuel use, and vented or fugitive methane), non-energy uses of oil, gas, and coal, emission factors for each fuel, calculation of emissions attributed to each Carbon Major producer, and several summary worksheets by fuel and for cumulative emissions by all entities.

One of the studies found that 2025 emissions could be reduced by as much as 4.5 GtCO2e through a variety of actions available to local governments and businesses, such as aggressive replacement of coal - fired energy production with clean energy sources and the implementation of policies like the Mercury and Air Toxics Standard and tougher vehicular fuel standards regardless of whether the federal government pursues them or not.

Across six regions, according to the report, coal provided 55 percent of daily incremental generation, and the study concludes that at least for PJM Interconnection (which manages the electricity grid across 12 Midwest and Mid-Atlantic states as well as DC), «coal provided the most resilient form of generation, due to available reserve capacity and on - site fuel availability, far exceeding all other sources» without which the region «would have experienced shortfalls leading to interconnect - wide blackouts.»

As I am aware, the alternatives under consideration are: a) either to cut anthropogenic CO2 emissions rapidly according to the Paris agreement in order to «transit away from fossile fuels», or b) to replace fossile fuels — in accordance with Eija - Riitta Korhola — by developing methods to replace energy from fossile fuels still available by using other energy sources available when that is profitable, or when fossile fuels are finishing.