The chart does not represent
the average arctic ice.
Not exact matches
Sea
ice in the
Arctic, on which
arctic animals hunt, rest, and reproduce, now covers 15 % less area than it did in 1978; it has thinned to an
average of 1.8 meters, compared to 3.1 meters in the 1950s.
This would certainly explain why
arctic sea
ice cover has been absolutely crashing in recent years while the HARDCRU / GISS global
average temps had been increasing more modestly.
Will Nitschke — «why was there no increased melting of the
arctic ice in 1998» — remember that the elevated global
average temperature in 1998 was due to El Niño.
The weather service predicted an
average to mild winter for the mid-west (Michigan), they got
arctic cold and record lake
ice.
It is arguably one of the most advanced of the seven in its impacts, with a 2011 GRL report putting its warming effect as equivalent to around 30 % of atmospheric anthro - CO2, and the recent report putting albedo loss from
arctic sea -
ice decline since»79 as providing a forcing equivalent on
average to that from 25 % of the anthro - CO2 levels during the period.
Actually the argument makes more sense applied to the
arctic sea
ice — both in winter and summer, since it is at a much higher
average latitude and therefore affects albedo much less.
Air temps in
arctic are almost precisely the same as the
average for the past 50 years — So it is unlikely air temps have created
ice loss — BUT CONVERSELY — the increased open
arctic water SHOULD be affecting the
arctic air temp - but is not (large expanses of 1 degree C
arctic water make it difficult for air temps to drop to minus ten C — but since that is what is happening, then in fact there must be much more cold air around to create «normal»
arctic temps for this time of the year)
The
average arctic sea
ice monthly extent for September 2012 was the lowest observed in the satellite era at 3.6 million square kilometers, based on National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) estimates — 50 % lower than the 1979 - 2000 average of 7.0 million square kilomete
ice monthly extent for September 2012 was the lowest observed in the satellite era at 3.6 million square kilometers, based on National Snow and
Ice Data Center (NSIDC) estimates — 50 % lower than the 1979 - 2000 average of 7.0 million square kilomete
Ice Data Center (NSIDC) estimates — 50 % lower than the 1979 - 2000
average of 7.0 million square kilometers.
Satellite data since 1978 show that annual
average arctic sea
ice extent has shrunk by 2.7 [2.1 to 3.3] % per decade, with larger decreases in summer of 7.4 [5.0 to 9.8] % per decade.
Al Gore and his ilk have to keep the focus on stuff beyond the reach of the
average person (like glaciers and
arctic sea
ice).
From 1978 to 1996, the
average ice cover around Antarctica showed almost no trend (a slight increase 1.3 % per decade), however
ice decreased by 2.9 % per decade on
average over the
arctic seas (1).
so that proves global warming, even thought the
average global temp is the same as sixteen years ago and the
arctic ice cap area is the highest in a decade and the Antarctic
ice cap is the highest in four decades.
That's a pretty silly claim on Dr. Curry's part if you consider that in the months the
arctic sea
ice isn't diminished, there's never really so much sunlight as you'd count it against the
average, so whatever albedo changes there are during the half of the year that matters, they're when the sun is at its highest angle.
Record droughts in many areas of the world, the loss of
arctic sea
ice — what you see is an increasing trend that is superimposed on annual variablity (no bets on what happens next year, but the five - to - ten year
average in global temperatures, sea surface temperatures, ocean heat content — those will increase — and
ice sheet volumes, tropical glacier volumes, sea
ice extent will decrease.
Hi iceman, Sorry for the tardy reply, that pesky real life thing again...:) The reason there is so little excitement about the record high sea
ice extent in the antarctic (aside from it having no appealing potential victims, like polar bears) versus the record low
arctic sea
ice is probably because the southern record is only a matter of 2 % anamoly, whereas in the north we are now looking at levels over 40 % below
average.
Statistics Canada —
Average area covered by total (all) sea
ice during summer from 1968 to 2010 for sea
ice regions of
Arctic Domain — EnviroStats — See how clear the trends are in all of Canada's
arctic regions: down, down, down at something like 7 or 8 percent a decade.