«These profound and clearly projected changes make physical and statistical sense, but they are invisible when looking at long - term trends in
average climate projections,» Gershunov said.
Not exact matches
The findings were not a total surprise, with future
projections showing that even with moderate
climate warming, air temperatures over the higher altitudes increase even more than at sea level, and that, on
average, fewer winter storm systems will impact the state.
Traditionally, scientists have been studying recovery in terms of decades — but
climate projections suggest that, on
average, severe coral bleaching will become a yearly occurrence by mid-century under «business as usual» and for some reefs this will be far sooner.
When this model was then applied to the future, they found that in a world of continuing high greenhouse gas emissions, the threshold for widespread drought - induced vascular damage would be crossed and initiate widespread tree deaths on
average across
climate model
projections in the 2050s.
Thus, scientists often make
climate projections at coarse spatial resolution where each projected data point is an
average value of a grid cell that measures hundreds of miles (kilometers) across.
Gerald A. Meehl, Haiyan Teng & Julie M. Arblaster, National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado 80307, USA (http://www.nature.com/nclimate/journal/v4/n10/full/nclimate2357.html): «The slowdown in the rate of global warming in the early 2000's is not evident in the multi-modal ensemble
average of traditional
climate change
projection simulations.»
I read a comment by a skeptic that because
climate model
projections are «
averaged over time» (ie.
Here's an illustration: the Figure below shows what happens when the
average ± 4 Wm - 2 long - wave cloud forcing error of CMIP5
climate models [1], is propagated through a couple of Community Climate System Model 4 (CCSM4) global air temperature proje
climate models [1], is propagated through a couple of Community
Climate System Model 4 (CCSM4) global air temperature proje
Climate System Model 4 (CCSM4) global air temperature
projections.
Figure 6: Easterbrook's two global temperature
projections A (green) and B (blue) vs. the IPCC TAR simple model
projection tuned to seven global
climate models for emissions scenario A2 (the closest scenario to reality thus far)(red) and observed global surface temperature change (the
average of NASA GISS, NOAA, and HadCRUT4)(black) over the period 2000 through 2011.
I merely propagate the global annual
average long - wave cloud forcing error made by CMIP5
climate models, in annual steps through a
projection.
With
climate projections showing a trend to higher
average and higher extreme temperatures across the West, it's likely that any drought will be more severe than it would have been without manmade warming, the study — along with others — warns.
The mean high temperature
projections for 2050 and 2100 were derived from a suite of 28
climate models (CMIP5 / Oak Ridge National Laboratory) under IPCC emissions scenario RCP8.5,
averaged over November 22 - 28 for 2030 - 2049 and 2080 - 2099, respectively.»
Model
projections for precipitation changes are less certain than those for temperature.12, 2 Under a higher emissions scenario (A2), global
climate models (GCMs) project
average winter and spring precipitation by late this century (2071 - 2099) to increase 10 % to 20 % relative to 1971 - 2000, while changes in summer and fall are not expected to be larger than natural variations.
The global
average sea level has already risen by about eight inches since 1901, with up to another two and a half feet of sea level rise possible by 2100, according to the most recent
projections from the U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change.
Citing the work of Dr. John Christy and Richard McNider at the University of Alabama in Huntsville (UAH), which compared
climate model
projections with temperatures measured independently by satellites and weather balloons, he said «the
average warming predicted to have occurred since 1979 (when the satellite data starts) is approximately three times larger than what is being observed.»
However, temperatures in recent years — both during the El Niño event and, more importantly, now that the El Niño event is over — are tracking rather close to the
average projection of the
climate models included in the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (the CMIP5 m
climate models included in the latest report from the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (the CMIP5 m
Climate Change (the CMIP5 models).
Sea - level
projections by the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC), by our research group and by others indicate that global
average sea level at the end of the century would likely be about 1 - 2.5 feet higher under the Paris path than in 2000.
Despite all the ludicrous adjustment machinations this newest NOAA revision relies on, the per century global warming trend fabricated (for the 1998 to 2012 period) remains well below even the IPCC's
average climate model
projections.
The current version of the figure gives the impression that the IPCC expected temperature to warm continuously year on year, which of course was not the expectation — the
projections shown here are just the long - term trend either from
averaging the GCMs or using simple
climate models.
Although there have been jumps and dips,
average atmospheric temperatures have risen little since 1998, in seeming defiance of
projections of
climate models and the ever - increasing emissions of greenhouse gases.»
The widespread trend of increasing heavy downpours is expected to continue, with precipitation becoming less frequent but more intense.13, 14,15,16 The patterns of the projected changes of precipitation do not contain the spatial details that characterize observed precipitation, especially in mountainous terrain, because the
projections are
averages from multiple models and because the effective resolution of global
climate models is roughly 100 - 200 miles.
2: Our Changing
Climate, Key Messages 5 and 6).4, 10 A range of model
projections for the end of this century under a higher emissions scenario (A2),
averaged over the region, suggests about 5 % to 20 % (25th to 75th percentile of model
projections) increases in winter precipitation.
Tackling methane and soot could reduce the scientists»
projections of
average warming in 2050 by 40 percent, which could mean the difference between triggering serious feedbacks in the global
climate systems or not.
The
climate models considered on
average simulate the amplitude of response to anthropogenic forcings well, increasing confidence in their
projections of profound future Arctic
climate change.
It is worth noting that the
average impact estimates for the baseline period are quantitatively in agreement with reported figures at European level (see Alfieri et al. 2015b), thus supporting the suitability of the impact model and the underlying datasets for future
climate projections.
The implicit assumption underlying all those multi-model
projections and
averages is that the model physical theory itself is physically complete and would yield a physically true representation of the
climate if only the parameters were exactly known, along with the initial conditions.
Well, speaking only of Queensland, Chapter 11 of AR4 WG1, Regional
Climate Projections, was very careful to make no specific projections for Australia and Queensland until 2080 - 2099 -LRB-(fig. 11.17), by when only those under 30 now are likely to be alive to verify whether its actual prediction of NO FLOODS in the Western Pacific proved correct: ALL 21 of the models deployed to make that prediction actually forecast precipitation at LESS than the average in 1
Projections, was very careful to make no specific
projections for Australia and Queensland until 2080 - 2099 -LRB-(fig. 11.17), by when only those under 30 now are likely to be alive to verify whether its actual prediction of NO FLOODS in the Western Pacific proved correct: ALL 21 of the models deployed to make that prediction actually forecast precipitation at LESS than the average in 1
projections for Australia and Queensland until 2080 - 2099 -LRB-(fig. 11.17), by when only those under 30 now are likely to be alive to verify whether its actual prediction of NO FLOODS in the Western Pacific proved correct: ALL 21 of the models deployed to make that prediction actually forecast precipitation at LESS than the
average in 1980 - 1999.
Arctic sea - ice has melted far beyond the expectations of
climate models - about 40 percent greater than the
average projection from the 2007 IPCC Report.
-- modelling procedure requires crude approximations over large grid cells, ignoring local
climate and weather phenomena as large as hurricances — model
projections are demonstrably unreliable at regional and local level: even those that appear to simulate the evolution of global temperature do so only by
averaging hundreds of more or less wrong results for the grid cells.
«Two thirds of the 23
climate models used to inform Australian
projections agree that rainfall will decrease in southern areas (for both the annual
average and in winter), in southern and eastern areas in spring, and along the west coast in autumn (CSIRO and BoM 2007).
To make the IPCC
projections of the evolution of the earth's
average temperature better reflect the latest scientific estimates of the
climate sensitivity, it is necessary to adjust them downward by about 30 % at the low end, about 50 % at the high end, and about 40 % in the middle.
At this point, the
projections of
climate change, assuming we continue business as usual, cluster around an estimate that
average temperatures will be about 9 degrees Fahrenheit higher in 2100 than they were in 2000.
None of these could have been caused by an increase in atmospheric CO2, Model
projections of warming during recent decades have greatly exceeded what has been observed, The modelling community has openly acknowledged that the ability of existing models to simulate past
climates is due to numerous arbitrary tuning adjustments, Observations show no statistically valid trends in flooding or drought, and no meaningful acceleration whatsoever of pre-existing long term sea level rise (about 6 inches per century) worldwide, Current carbon dioxide levels, around 400 parts per million are still very small compared to the
averages over geological history, when thousands of parts per million prevailed, and when life flourished on land and in the oceans.
Coupled with the
average climate - change — driven rate of sea level rise over these same 25 y of 2.9 mm / y, simple extrapolation of the quadratic implies global mean sea level could rise 65 ± 12 cm by 2100 compared with 2005, roughly in agreement with the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) 5th Assessment Report (AR5) model proje
climate - change — driven rate of sea level rise over these same 25 y of 2.9 mm / y, simple extrapolation of the quadratic implies global mean sea level could rise 65 ± 12 cm by 2100 compared with 2005, roughly in agreement with the Intergovernmental Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) 5th Assessment Report (AR5) model proje
Climate Change (IPCC) 5th Assessment Report (AR5) model
projections.
Using existing output data from global
climate models, the researchers plotted
projections of changes in global
average temperature and rainfall against regional changes in daily extremes.
Projections indicate that
climate change may increase the
average intensity of such storms by 2 — 11 % by 2100 so it's important to be able to predict the likely damage to crops that will ensue.