Sentences with phrase «average districts when»

Not exact matches

[23] When combined with the 27 cent federal reimbursement for most paid lunches, this means these districts are collecting, on average, $ 2.07 for each paid lunch in elementary schools and $ 2.41 in high schools.

According to the study, when chocolate milk was eliminated from cafeterias at 58 schools in seven school districts across the country, milk consumption went down by an average of 35 %, and did not recover even after a year's time.

When weather conditions allow (an average temperature of 20 degrees Fahrenheit or colder for 5 consecutive days, 5 - 6 inches of ground frost), park district staff will begin flooding the ice rink at Sunset Woods Park.

He also said that when he was informed about the new Fomena District Hospital he thought it would be an average sized hospital.

While once considered a «average need» district when it comes to state funding, ELCS is now considered a «high needs» district, Osborne said.

We find that when a district increases per - pupil school spending by $ 100 due to reforms, spending on instruction increases by about $ 70, spending on support services increases by roughly $ 40, spending on capital increases by about $ 10, while there are reductions in other kinds of school spending, on average.

In Dallas, Fort Worth, and Houston, the coefficients of variation were nearly always more than 0.15, meaning that one - third of the schools in these districts had spending levels that deviated from their district's average by 15 percent (or $ 225,000 for a school of 500 when average spending is $ 3,000 per pupil).

The average teacher in Milwaukee gets $ 56,500 (beginning teachers get much less), but when benefits are included, the total cost to the district runs just over $ 100,000.

Houston ranged between 0.2 and 0.25, except for one year, while Dallas had the highest levels of inequality, hovering around 0.3 until the 2000 — 01 school year, when it experienced a dramatic drop in the level of inequality in the district, indicating that a greater percentage of schools were funded at or near the district's average allocation per pupil.

When district enrollment declines year over year, the allocation is made on the basis of the previous year's average daily attendance.

Sixty - eight percent of all U.S. districts have average math achievement below the 50th percentile when compared to achievement in 25 developed nations

When people are asked to estimate per pupil spending in their local school districts, the average response in 2016 is $ 7,020, a little more than 50 percent of the actual per pupil expenditure of $ 12,440.

When we asked respondents to estimate per pupil spending in their local school district, the average response in 2016 was $ 7,020, little more than 50 % of the actual per pupil expenditure of $ 12,440, on average, in the districts in which respondents lived.

This interpretation is bolstered by the fact that, when we look at other employees who live in a district but don't work there, and thus do not have an occupational stake in the elections, their turnout proves to be decidedly lower on average than that of other employees who both work and live there.

If information on current salaries is not provided, support for salary increments goes up in those districts that rank above average when respondents learn this fact.

Apparently, learning about their district's national ranking shocks those living in above - average districts, even when learning about their district's state ranking does not.

They improved on curriculum and district tests at an average rate of 15 - 30 percent when we followed these four strategies.

But when respondents in below - average districts are told about state and national rankings, the level of confidence in teachers falls by 7 and 8 percentage points, respectively.

The difference between the informed and the uninformed in below - average districts is slightly larger: 6 percentage points when given state ranking and 11 percentage points when given national ranking.

Support among those residing in below - average districts does drop by 7 percentage points when statewide ranking information is provided, but even among this group a clear majority remains supportive.

After a six - year span in which districts saw average annual insurance costs rise by more than 40 percent, school boards were able to shed expenses when potential insurers were forced to compete with each other.

Starting with the 2008 - 09 school year, individual districts must meet new size caps in each classroom, robbing school officials of the wiggle room they enjoyed during the phase - in period, when school systems were allowed to use districtwide and then schoolwide averages in calculating class sizes.

The school districts in New Orleans beat the state average with 77.8 percent, a staggering 25 percentage points above the 2004 rate, when only 54.4 percent of students graduated from high school.

When researchers examined the prior achievement - test scores of students transferring to charter schools, they found that those scores were near or below the local district or state average.

If a school district fails to make adjustments in the face of rising charter school enrollment, and it keeps the same number of staff and facilities despite having fewer students, it will pay a double penalty: Because charter school tuition payments are pegged to a district's average spending per student, a school district's charter payments rise when costs per student rise.

The Equity Project made headlines in 2008 when it announced it would pay nearly double the average salary of teachers in the city's district schools.

And when the district recently made public the average teacher salary increases under the new pact — ranging from 2.5 percent to 4 percent per year — it didn't include what can be lucrative raises given to educators who earn master's degrees and other graduate credits.

«We should question the relevance of comparing so - called U.S. national student performance with average scores in other countries, when U.S. students attend schools in 51 separate education systems run by states and the District of Columbia, not the federal government,» said Carnoy.

It focuses on the relevance of comparing U.S. national student performance with average scores in other countries when U.S. students attend schools in 51 separate education systems run not by the federal government, but by states (plus the District of Columbia).

Indeed, a close look at MCAS results shows there is surprisingly little difference between the quality of teaching in so - called «good» schools (wealthy, suburban schools with high MCAS scores) and «bad» schools (inner - city schools with low scores) when the results are averaged across all teachers in the district and disaggregated by student demographics, specifically race and poverty.

Average district per - pupil spending does not always capture staffing and funding inequities.14 Many districts do not consider actual teacher salaries when budgeting for and reporting each school's expenditures, and the highest - poverty schools are often staffed by less - experienced teachers who typically earn lower salaries.15 Because educator salaries are, by far, schools» largest budget item, schools serving the poorest children end up spending much less on what matters most for their students» learning.

And in a year when the United Federation of Teachers is making its «top legislative priority» a bill that would impose sanctions on charters that do not educate the same proportions of special needs kids compared to district averages (even though many district schools don't meet these same standards), one might expect the union would have something to say about the disturbing findings in this report.

Black HISD students today are 34 percent more likely to be in special education than the district average, which is not much different than a decade ago, when they were 36 percent more likely to be in special education.

When the staff of each school district is reviewed, «A» rated districts, on average, employ more teachers as a percentage of their staff than all other districts, while «D» rated districts (the lowest ranking any district is currently rated) employed the smallest number of teachers as a percentage of their staff, according to most recent data available.

But why compare national student performance in the United States with average scores in other countries, when U.S. students attend schools in 51 separate education systems responsible to states and the District of Columbia, not the federal government?

The program was created in 2006 when he Legislature reduced property tax rates by one - third, and guaranteed that school districts would have the ability to maintain at least the same level of per - student funding for weighted average daily attendance during the 2005 - 06 school year.

But when asked, the respondents estimated per - pupil expenditures in their local school district, they guessed, on average, just $ 6,307 — about half of what was actually spent.

When average daily attendance goes down, the tuition cost automatically goes up, because the district's expenses are being divided among fewer students.

Despite a recent press report indicating LAUSD was below the average, it turns out on many measures, when compared with other urban districts in California, the district appears competitive.

Since 1993, when the state imposed limits on how much districts can raise revenue, average teacher salary and benefits in Wisconsin have increased more than 4 percent a year, even though revenue limits have increased about 3.5 percent a year.

When The Los Angeles Times released a database of «value - added analysis» of every teacher in the Los Angeles Unified School District in August, Mr. Ruelas was rated «less effective than average.»

All three school choice programs tend to have a lower percentage of children with disabilities and emerging bilingual students (ELL) when compared to their local school district averages.

Rather they serve less needy children and when adjusting school aggregate performance measures for the children they serve, they achieve no better current outcomes on average than the schools they are slated to take over... The assumption that charter takeover can solve the ills of certain district schools is specious at best.»

When I reflect on what the NAACP has helped Black people accomplish since its founding in 1909, I am surprised that NAACP might not support a high - quality charter school like ours, where my son and his peers are surpassing district and state grade - level averages across literacy and math after just one year.

Because pensions are based on an employee's final average salary, when districts increase salaries they're also increasing future pension payments.

Measuring all of the district's Achieve3000 schools together, MCSD improved its average Lexile scores from 469 to 542 in 2015 - 16 and from 560 to 642 in 2016 - 17 when comparing the pre-test and post-test levels, according to the presentation MCSD executive director of preK - 12 curriculum and instruction Lorrie Watt gave the Muscogee County School Board during its Sept. 18 meeting.

Unfortunately, carryover effects of prior funding decisions still require the use of hold harmless clauses to ensure that many school districts (including a mixture of wealthy and average wealth districts) continue to receive a least as much state and local revenue as was provided in prior sessions, even when those amounts were inequitable.

In district - level analysis, the Education Trust finds that nationally districts serving high concentrations of low - income students receive on average $ 1,200 less in state and local funding than districts that serve low concentrations of low - income students, and that gap widens to $ 2,000 when comparing high - minority and low - minority districts.17 These findings are further reflected by national funding equity measures reported by Education Week, which indicate that wealthy school districts spend more per student than poorer school districts do on average.18

When a student leaves the traditional public school system for a charter school, the school district loses the average funding for a student.

That's especially true when you consider that teachers in the West Chicago district have an average salary of $ 75,000 a year, a good bit higher than the $ 63,377 median household income in the village of West Chicago.