Sentences with phrase «average dividend payout»

Average dividend payout ratios and return on equity figures were consistently higher over three years for the companies with three or more women on their board, the research finds.

That is, aggregate dividends can be determined arithmetically by nominal GDP, corporate earnings as a percent of nominal GDP, and the average dividend payout ratio.

Aggregate Dividends = (Nominal GDP) x (Corporate Earnings as % of GDP) x (Average Dividend Payout Ratio)

That's twice the average dividend payout on the S&P 500.

Not exact matches

It has a 5.54 % yield — it increased its dividend by 6.9 % last quarter — and while more purchases like this one could impede future dividend increases, writes Plessis, you're still getting an above average payout.

Discipline refers to the rigorous quantitative and qualitative methodologies used in the identification and selection of companies that have: better than average relative valuations; a track record of dividend growth and a sustainable payout level; and balance sheet strength.

Within each segment, rank stocks based on total net payout yield (NPY), calculated as dividend yield minus change in shares outstanding divided by its 24 - month moving average.

Portfolio # 1 shows an average dividend yield of 8.12 %, this is a very impressive payout distribution yield.

Taking this key metric into account, I ran a screen for dividend payers in the energy and materials sector, trading on a major U.S. exchange with yields better than the 10 - year Treasury and an even more sustainable payout ratio of less than 25 % — lower than the S&P 500 average.

Over the 50 - year period, the dividend payout ratio averaged 43 %, meaning that 57 % of earnings were being invested to support future growth.

Here are the equations with y = the 4 - year moving average of the growth of the dividend amount and x = the payout ratio based on smoothed earnings E10.

My problem is that when i look for stocks i set very strict parameter rules like: — minimum dividend growth rate of 7 - 10 % in last years 10, 5 years average — historical stocks that increased dividend at least for the last 15 years or paid historically (like BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA)-- very low debt — low payout ratio — historically (long term) stock price has been increasing etc...

The latter portfolio growth concern translates into a very boring but predictable REIT that increases its dividend payout on average 2 % a year.

I determined the growth of (real) dividends as a function of the payout ratio (dividends / earnings) in terms of E10, the average of a decade of trailing (real) earnings.

It's nice to see that my regular monthly dividend payouts are fast approaching the $ 500 mark (my projected average dividend income hit that milestone last August), and I will probably reach it within the first quarter of 2015.

With a monthly payout of 7 cents per share, I will receive $ 10.50 per month from CHW, which raises my projected monthly average dividend income to $ 654.88.

Dividend investing lesson for the month: Limit your dividend stock's payout weight (the percentage of the average monthly dividend Dividend investing lesson for the month: Limit your dividend stock's payout weight (the percentage of the average monthly dividend dividend stock's payout weight (the percentage of the average monthly dividend dividend income).

Not only does Target have 46 consecutive years of dividend increases under its belt, but the company has increased its payout by an average of 19.8 % a year for the past 10 years.

The remaining stocks are then assigned a rank based on their yield (the higher the yield the higher the rank), payout ratio (the lower the payout ratio the higher the rank), 3 year dividend growth rate, and 5/10 year Dividend Acceleration / Deceleration (5 - year average increase divided by 10 - year average individend growth rate, and 5/10 year Dividend Acceleration / Deceleration (5 - year average increase divided by 10 - year average inDividend Acceleration / Deceleration (5 - year average increase divided by 10 - year average increase).

Within each segment, rank stocks based on total net payout yield (NPY), calculated as dividend yield minus change in shares outstanding divided by its 24 - month moving average.

Using this data it is possible to infer the dividend yield for each period that is used, along with the average payout ratio, from the current MSCI data to calculate the earnings per share and CAPE prior to 2005.

These companies have increased their dividend for at least 15 years and have a lower than average price to earnings (PE) ratio, a higher operating margin, a low price to book, a reasonable dividend yield and payout ratio.

As seen below, the company's payout ratios have been somewhat volatile over the last decade but have averaged around 50 - 60 %, providing reasonable cushion and opportunity for dividend growth.

The equations determine y = the 4 - year moving average of the growth of the dividend amount and x = the payout ratio based on smoothed earnings E10 (where x is a percentage).

The average payout ratio for the group is 57 %, meaning just over half of the companies earnings are used to pay dividends, this is a reasonable level.

AGNC pays $ 2.75 annual dividend yield: 11.80 % Its projected 10YOC is 11.80 %, payout ratio 129 % (note, this is a REIT, the ratio will be at or higher than 100 %) 5 yr average growth: -6.88 % paid dividend since: 2008 # of years of consecutive dividend increases: 0 years

GG pays $ 0.60 annual dividend yield: 2.40 % Its projected 10YOC is 4.01 %, payout ratio 31 % 5 yr average growth: 30.18 % paid dividend since: 2001 # of years of consecutive dividend increases: 4 years

MCD pays $ 3.40 annual dividend yield: 3.60 % Its projected 10YOC is 6.64 %, payout ratio 59 % 5 yr average growth: 10.17 % paid dividend since: 1976 # of years of consecutive dividend increases: 37 years

OHI pays $ 2.04 annual dividend yield: 5.90 % Its projected 10YOC is 14.76 %, payout ratio 256 % 5 yr average growth: 10.58 % paid dividend since: 1992 # of years of consecutive dividend increases: 10 years

Franklin Resources has a Dividend Growth Score of 71, indicating that dividend investors can expect continued stronger than average payout growth, at least for the timDividend Growth Score of 71, indicating that dividend investors can expect continued stronger than average payout growth, at least for the timdividend investors can expect continued stronger than average payout growth, at least for the time being.

Supporting this is the company's average dividend quality score of 58 out of a possible score of 100, which points to some weakness in being able to sustain the higher payout ratio.

PSEC pays $ 1.33 annual dividend yield: 12.90 % Its projected 10YOC is 19.47 %, payout ratio 171 % (note, this is a BDC, the ratio will be at or higher than 100 %) 5 yr average growth: -3.43 % paid dividend since: 2004 # of years of consecutive dividend increases: 2 years

Portfolio # 1 shows an average dividend yield of 8.12 %, this is a very impressive payout distribution yield.

Brown - Forman has a Dividend Growth Score of 83 indicating that dividend investors can likely expect better than average payout growth in the years and decades Dividend Growth Score of 83 indicating that dividend investors can likely expect better than average payout growth in the years and decades dividend investors can likely expect better than average payout growth in the years and decades to come.

VNR pays $ 2.52 annual dividend yield: 8.70 % Its projected 10YOC is 8.70 %, payout ratio N / A 5 yr average growth: 4.77 % paid dividend since: 2008 # of years of consecutive dividend increases: 0 years

This compares to a peer average dividend yield of 2.39 percent and a payout level of 46.70 percent.

VTR pays $ 2.90 annual dividend yield: 4.80 % Its projected 10YOC is 12.76 %, payout ratio 176 % 5 yr average growth: 7.21 % paid dividend since: 1999 # of years of consecutive dividend increases: 4 years

The ROC and income parts of EDF's dividends change a little from month to month, but ROC averages around 15 % and income averages 85 % of the total dividend payout, so that's an Income / ROC ratio I can live with.

So you add nearly 2 % of after - tax return per annum if you only achieve an average return by historical standards from common stock investments in companies with tiny dividend payout ratios.

This represents a yield of 4.3 % and a payout ratio of 64 %, which is in line with the company's historical averages and why VZ is considered one of the more appealing, safe dividend stocks.

However, the company's average dividend quality score of 58 out of a possible score of 100, points to some weakness in the sustainability of its robust payout ratio, and makes its less attractive for dividend investors seeking current income.

With a yield that's higher than the average dividend - paying stock in the S&P 500, and management's history of increased payouts, ABT stock is one to consider for retirement portfolios.

The company's payout ratios are relatively low compared to peers as well, which should provide at least average dividend growth going forward.

They were 35.3 % (single - year), 34.1 % (five year average of payout ratios) and 34.2 % (average of five years of dividends divided by the average of five years of earnings).

Using an alternate criterion (that the average of five years of payout ratios or the ratio of the average of five years of dividends divided by five years of earnings must be below 40 %), there were three sequences with returns less than 1 % over 5 - years: 1997, 1998 and 2000.

Dividend Growth Baselines Dividend Growth Rates In my Addendum to Dividend Growth Rates, I wrote: «I examined the single - year payout ratio [D / E], the average of five years of single - year payout ratios [Average (D / E)-RSB- and the ratio of the average of five years of dividends to the average of five years of earnings [Average (D) / Average (Eaverage of five years of single - year payout ratios [Average (D / E)-RSB- and the ratio of the average of five years of dividends to the average of five years of earnings [Average (D) / Average (EAverage (D / E)-RSB- and the ratio of the average of five years of dividends to the average of five years of earnings [Average (D) / Average (Eaverage of five years of dividends to the average of five years of earnings [Average (D) / Average (Eaverage of five years of earnings [Average (D) / Average (EAverage (D) / Average (EAverage (E)-RSB-.

And with dividend payouts for the broad stock market now below 2 % and the average domestic - stock fund's expense ratio more than 1 %, it's easy to see how the math can get very ugly very fast for investors in high - cost dividend - focused funds.

These are the years in which the five - year average of the payout ratio is less than 50 % and the 5 - year dividend growth rate is less than 1.0 %.

I agree that the ROE isn't stellar, averaging 9 % over the past three years, but I do think the low valuation, strong balance sheet, and most importantly the potential dividend growth merit your consideration (current dividend payout is just 32 % of 2013 EPS estimates, and ideally they'd continue their strong recent series of increases).

So you add nearly 2 % of after - tax return per annum if you only achieve an average return by historical standards from common stock investments in companies with low dividend payout ratios.