Hyundai, which currently leads the industry in fuel economy, says that it will have no trouble reaching that or any other scheduled Corporate
Average Fuel Economy increases.
Those fuel economy numbers may not look like much, they represent a more than 20 percent
average fuel economy increase from the similarly equipped 2004 Durango.
NHTSA's 2008 rulemaking aimed to achieve a combined standard of 31.8 mpg for MY 2015 with
average fuel economy increasing at the MY 2011 - 2015 rate (4.5 % per year) during MYs 2016 - 2020.
Not exact matches
Those modifications include stop — start (idle - off) systems in which the engine shuts down when the car is stopped during driving; low rolling - resistance tires (which are harder and thus less flat, reducing friction); variable valve timing for engines, which
increases gas consumption efficiency; and
fuel economy computers or displays to encourage eco-driving, such as such as those in the Toyota Prius, which show miles per gallon
averages for that moment, hour, week or month, or when riding downhill, so that drivers are more aware of how their driving impacts
fuel efficiency.
The model produces different jobs and growth projections for a business - as - usual scenario with no technology breakthroughs or major new policies, and then generates different outcomes by factoring in new policies such as a national clean energy standards such as proposed by President Obama;
increases in corporate
average fuel economy standards; tougher environmental controls on coal - fired power generators; extended investment and production tax credits for clean energy sources and an expanded federal energy loan guarantee program.
$ 8 billion) over first ten years for deficit reductionObeys PAYGO; Starting in 2026, 25 % of auction revenues for deficit reductionFuels and TransportationIncrease biofuels to 60 million gallons by 2030, low - carbon
fuel standard of 10 % by 2010, 1 million plug» in hybrid cars by 2025, raise
fuel economy standards, smart growth funding, end oil subsidies, promote natural gas drilling, enhanced oil recoverySmart growth funding, plug - in hybrids, raise
fuel economy standards $ 7 billion a year for smart growth funding, plug - in hybrids, natural gas vehicles, raise
fuel economy standards; offshore drilling with revenue sharing and oil spill veto, natural gas fracking disclosureCost ContainmentInternational offsetsOffset pool, banking and borrowing flexibility, soft price collar using permit reserve auction at $ 28 per ton going to 60 % above three - year -
average market price» Hard» price collar between $ 12 and $ 25 per ton, floor
increases at 3 % + CPI, ceiling at 5 % + CPI, plus permit reserve auction, offsets like W - MClean Air Act And StatesNot discussedOnly polluters above 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent a year, regional cap and trade suspended until 2017, EPA to set stationary source performance standards in 2016, some Clean Air Act provisions excludedOnly polluters above 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide equivalent a year, regional cap and trade pre-empted, establishes coal - fired plant performance standards, some Clean Air Act provisions excludedInternational CompetitivenessTax incentives for domestic auto industryFree allowances for trade - exposed industries, 2020 carbon tariff on importsCarbon tariff on importsReferences: Barack Obama, 2007; Barack Obama, 8/3/08; Pew Center, 6/26/09; leaked drafts of American Power Act, 5/11/10.
Citing
increased pressure to adhere to stricter Corporate
Average Fuel Economy standards, the Xterra could be the first casualty in Nissan's lineup, plagued by a shrinking market segment and slow sales.
«In light of future greenhouse gas and corporate
average fuel economy requirements beginning in 2017,» their petition says, «camera - based systems represent an opportunity to
increase vehicle
fuel efficiency through improved aerodynamics by eliminating externally mounted mirrors.»
The
average MY 2016 adjusted
fuel economy for cars
increased to 28.5 mpg, a 0.3 mpg
increase over MY 2015.
Based on spy photos, we know it will look radically different from the current breed, and with the government expected to
increase CAFE (Corporate
Average Fuel Economy) standards, don't be surprised if a V - 8 isn't offered in the next - generation Camaro.
The all - new, ninth - generation 2012 Honda Civic Hybrid, using a lithium ion battery for the first time,
increases its
average EPA
fuel economy rating from 41 mpg to 44 mpg.
Since then, the company has been assessing how much it would cost to produce the car and what effect an
increase in government - mandated corporate
average fuel economy standards might have on the project.
Aftermarket engine performance - parts manufacturers will soon be facing new challenges due to the
increasing effect of the Corporate
Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards.
Consumer advocates Ralph Nader and Joan Claybrook have joined forces with environmental activists to support
increased fuel economy averages for cars sold in this country.
In spite of the
increase in performance, the S3 Sportback's
fuel economy and CO2
averages remain competitive: For manual models that's 7.0 L / 100 km and 162g / km, and for the «auto» 6.9 and 159.
The new 2012 Honda Civic Hybrid, using a lithium ion battery for the first time,
increased its
average EPA
fuel economy rating from 41 mpg to 44 mpg.
Do you guys realize that its
increased the
average EPA
fuel economy rating from 41 mpg to 44 mpg?.
In addition to the lead phase - out a well - planned and sustained effort to raise
average vehicle efficiency standards (the CAFE, or Corporate Average Fuel Economy) increased vehicle mileage standards by a q
average vehicle efficiency standards (the CAFE, or Corporate
Average Fuel Economy) increased vehicle mileage standards by a q
Average Fuel Economy)
increased vehicle mileage standards by a quarter.
But because tons and power
increased so much, the
average new car sold in 2009 used only 10 to 15 percent less
fuel per kilometer than one sold in 1990, when the present
fuel economy standards maxed out.
The new
fuel economy standard will
increase to an
average of 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025 (for fleets of cars and light trucks together), from the current 27.3 miles per gallon.
That led to rules that steadily reduce carbon emission levels (and parallel rules to
increase corporate
average fuel economy) from 2012 through 2025.
President Bush has called for 4 percent
average annual
fuel economy increases that automakers call «unattainable.»
1975: Energy Policy and Conservation Act, Corporate
Average Fuel Economy (NHTSA) Intended to reduce energy consumption by increasing the fuel economy of cars and light trucks in response to the oil embargo and resulting price shocks in the early 19
Fuel Economy (NHTSA) Intended to reduce energy consumption by increasing the fuel economy of cars and light trucks in response to the oil embargo and resulting price shocks in the early
Economy (NHTSA) Intended to reduce energy consumption by
increasing the
fuel economy of cars and light trucks in response to the oil embargo and resulting price shocks in the early 19
fuel economy of cars and light trucks in response to the oil embargo and resulting price shocks in the early
economy of cars and light trucks in response to the oil embargo and resulting price shocks in the early 1970s.
I start (and started) from the premise that the dramatic decline in crude oil prices that took place from August, 2014 ($ 96 / barrel), to March, 2015 ($ 44 / barrel), was due — on the one hand — to decreased demand, a function of slow economic growth in Asia, Europe, and elsewhere, endogenous, price - driven technological change leading to greater
fuel efficiency, and policy - driven technological change that also has been leading to greater fuel efficiency, such as more stringent Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards in the United States; and — on the other hand — was due to increased supply, partly a function of the growth of unconventional (tight) U.S. oil production (a product of the combination of two technologies — horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturi
fuel efficiency, and policy - driven technological change that also has been leading to greater
fuel efficiency, such as more stringent Corporate Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards in the United States; and — on the other hand — was due to increased supply, partly a function of the growth of unconventional (tight) U.S. oil production (a product of the combination of two technologies — horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturi
fuel efficiency, such as more stringent Corporate
Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards in the United States; and — on the other hand — was due to increased supply, partly a function of the growth of unconventional (tight) U.S. oil production (a product of the combination of two technologies — horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturi
Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards in the United States; and — on the other hand — was due to
increased supply, partly a function of the growth of unconventional (tight) U.S. oil production (a product of the combination of two technologies — horizontal drilling and hydraulic fracturing).
Today, the Obama Administration's Environmental Protection Agency and Department of Transportation told the press that they were considering requiring
increases of between 3 and 6 percent per year in
fuel economy after the 35.5 miles per gallon
average for cars and light trucks goes into effect in 2016.
Recently, some environmental pressure groups suggested that the next round of
increases in Corporate
Average Fuel Economy Standards for cars and light trucks should be 60 miles per gallon by 2025.
That EPA is regulating
fuel economy is also evident from EPA, NHTSA, and the California Air Resources Board's (CARB's) Interim Joint Technical Assessment Report, the framework document for the Administration's current plan to
increase average fuel economy to 54.5 miles per gallon by 2025.
The December STEO expects that gasoline prices in 2015 will be 23 % lower than the 2014
average, and consumption in December will be virtually unchanged from year - earlier levels, as
increased fuel economy balances out
increases in vehicle miles traveled in response to lower prices and other factors.
As both the House and the Senate grapple with proposed carbon - cutting measures — carbon taxes and «cap - and - trade» schemes for big CO2 emitters such as coal - fired power plants;
increased Corporate
Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards for cars, SUVs, and trucks; and mandatory set - asides for clean renewable energy in the mix of energy generation options — emissions from aircraft seem, at least for the time being, to have gone over the heads of most policymakers engaged in the rush to cut carbon emissions.
This new energy legislation, the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, raised the
fuel economy standards of America's cars, light trucks, and SUVs to a combined
average of at least 35 miles per gallon by 2020 — a 10 mpg
increase over 2007 levels — and required standards to be met at maximum feasible levels through 2030.
About 10 days after the finding was left unopened by officials at the Office of Management and Budget, Congress passed and President Bush signed a new energy bill mandating an
increase in
average fuel -
economy standards to 35 miles per gallon by 2020.
Moreover, artificially
increasing the popularity of alternative motor vehicles under the Corporate
Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards has the unintended effect of decreasing new conventional vehicle fuel econ
Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards has the unintended effect of decreasing new conventional vehicle fuel e
Economy (CAFE) standards has the unintended effect of decreasing new conventional vehicle
fuel econ
fuel economyeconomy.
Also at stake is a significant
increase in Corporate
Average Fuel Economy standards for cars and trucks in the Senate version of the bill.
Roll back Corporate
Average Fuel Economy (CAFE) standards, which result in the deaths of thousands of car and truck passengers every year, needlessly
increase the price of new cars, and favor foreign car manufacturers