Not exact matches
Federal Reserve data show that
average family
income at
households headed by self - employed people declined 5.4 percent in real terms between 1989 and 2010, while
average family
income at
households headed by people working for others rose 20.4 percent in inflation -
adjusted terms over the same period.
For
income quintiles, we used
average household incomes,
adjusted for size of
household, within a given area of census enumeration derived from postal codes.
The law places no limits on recipients»
household incomes (i.e., it's not «means - tested» for low -
income families), and in fact the
average adjusted gross
income of recipient families was $ 51,923, slightly higher than the state's 2012 median
income.
The
average mortgage interest deduction for
households with an
adjusted gross
income of $ 50,000 to $ 100,000 was more than $ 10,000.
For
households in the top 1 percent of the
income distribution, inflation -
adjusted after - tax
income grew at an
average rate of about 3 percent per year, making that
income 192 percent higher in 2013 than it was in 1979 for those
households.
In contrast,
households in the bottom quintile experienced an
average growth of about 1 percent per year in their inflation -
adjusted after - tax
income over the same period, making that
income 46 percent higher in 2013 than it was in 1979, CBO estimates.
In contrast,
households in the bottom quintile experienced inflation -
adjusted after - tax
income growth of 1.2 percent per year, on
average.
So, if you can just show, for example, that the odds of a stock market crash are far higher in years when the P - E ratio is much higher than
average (or for housing crashes the buy - rent, or price -
household income ratio), or that the expected risk -
adjusted long run return is much lower than
average, or other «anomalies» (anomalous to the EMH) like this, then you can show that the EMH is substantially far from the truth.