Sentences with phrase «average humans still»

Not exact matches

Science is still a far cry from biological immortality, but it isn't unreasonable to say that the average human could live to 120 or more, in good health, in the not - too - distant future.

Still though, we also don't take into consideration that it is not just that opening being affected, but the woman's whole pelvic floor that is doing the pushing out a whole freakin» human baby that is on average six or seven or more pounds.

Since the UK uses paper ballot, the possibility for human error in the recount is obviously still there, however sorting errors should on average be reduced, since this will be a further check on resorted piles, rather than the initial sorting.

The sheep didn't do as well but still passed, recognizing the celebrities about 67 percent of the time on average — a drop in performance comparable to that seen in humans performing the same task.

Despite the sheer volume of Tweets produced by bots, humans still have better quality and more engaging tweets — tweets by human accounts receive on average 19 times more likes and 10 times more retweets than tweets by bot accounts.

Until recently, genome sequencing was too expensive to be considered accessible to the average human — and even though prices are dropping, it's still not cheap.

These days the average human is still getting adequate amounts of dietary protein.

I'm an average human being, still trying to know myself completely..

There's still a need to scrunch down so as to not scrape the roof, but it's minimal, and there's more than ample room for average - sized humans.

So, again, I fully recognize that, on average, we are still in a warming trend, and some of it may be human - caused.

«Climate science» as it is used by warmists implies adherence to a set of beliefs: (1) Increasing greenhouse gas concentrations will warm the Earth's surface and atmosphere; (2) Human production of CO2 is producing significant increases in CO2 concentration; (3) The rate of rise of temperature in the 20th and 21st centuries is unprecedented compared to the rates of change of temperature in the previous two millennia and this can only be due to rising greenhouse gas concentrations; (4) The climate of the 19th century was ideal and may be taken as a standard to compare against any current climate; (5) global climate models, while still not perfect, are good enough to indicate that continued use of fossil fuels at projected rates in the 21st century will cause the CO2 concentration to rise to a high level by 2100 (possibly 700 to 900 ppm); (6) The global average temperature under this condition will rise more than 3 °C from the late 19th century ideal; (7) The negative impact on humanity of such a rise will be enormous; (8) The only alternative to such a disaster is to immediately and sharply reduce CO2 emissions (reducing emissions in 2050 by 80 % compared to today's rate) and continue further reductions after 2050; (9) Even with such draconian CO2 reductions, the CO2 concentration is likely to reach at least 450 to 500 ppm by 2100 resulting in significant damage to humanity; (10) Such reductions in CO2 emissions are technically feasible and economically affordable while providing adequate energy to a growing world population that is increasingly industrializing.

These climate changes are a result of human and natural climate forcings and feedbacks — the relative role of each in altering atmospheric and ocean circulation features, and even the global annual average radiative forcing, however, is still uncertain.

How the United Nations or anyone can say the average human being is harming the environment with a straight face while the government is already engaged in wide scale geoengineering projects based on bunk data that have untold detrimental short - and long - term impact around the entire globe on the environment and its flora and fauna — carrying out projects that have never been approved through any democratic process whatsoever and which we are still not officially being told is happening even as it goes on over our heads — is despicable.

It's been predicted that by 2026 the average desktop computer (if we still have such a thing) will have the computing power of the human brain.

Whereas the previous build came at a bone - crushing 330 lbs, this one is right around 180 lbs — you still don't want it falling on top of you, but it's a bit closer to the weight of the average human.