Sentences with phrase «average level of support»

Parties moving back towards their long - run average level of support and / or the level of support at the previous election.

And the overall average level of support fell to 89 %, down from between 90 - 91 % in 2014.

Not exact matches

Paul Ciana, a technical strategist at Bank of America Merrill Lynch, sees the next major support level for 10 - year notes at around 2.95 percent, the 150 - month simple moving average, which they last touched in 2007.

By comparison, the daily chart of the iShares Russell 2000 Index ETF ($ IWM) shows the recent weakness that has led to a breakdown below three different levels of technical price support: the low of the multi-week trading range (around $ 93), the 20 - day exponential moving average (beige line), AND the dominant uptrend line (which began with the November 2012 low):

When a stock demonstrates bullish reversal action after bouncing off a level of support (the 20 - day exponential moving average in this case), it will often enter into one or two days of tight price consolidation.

Stocks and averages can and frequently do «undercut» obvious levels of price support for a few days and bounce right back (we like those plays for buy entry):

The next major support level is the 50 - day moving average ($ 112 area), while the second zone of support is the prior swing lows (just below $ 110):

In the process of doing so, the 40 - week moving average subsequently transforms from a paramount support level to a major area of overhead resistance that is tough to push through (especially when the 10 - week moving average begins to roll over as well).

But if that moving average fails to hold as support, then a touch of the 10 - day moving average is the next logical support level.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ include general business and economic conditions and the state of the solar industry; governmental support for the deployment of solar power; future available supplies of high - purity silicon; demand for end - use products by consumers and inventory levels of such products in the supply chain; changes in demand from significant customers; changes in demand from major markets such as Japan, the U.S., India and China; changes in customer order patterns; changes in product mix; capacity utilization; level of competition; pricing pressure and declines in average selling prices; delays in new product introduction; delays in utility - scale project approval process; delays in utility - scale project construction; delays in the completion of project sales; continued success in technological innovations and delivery of products with the features customers demand; shortage in supply of materials or capacity requirements; availability of financing; exchange rate fluctuations; litigation and other risks as described in the Company's SEC filings, including its annual report on Form 20 - F filed on April 27, 2017.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ include general business and economic conditions and the state of the solar industry; governmental support for the deployment of solar power; future available supplies of high - purity silicon; demand for end - use products by consumers and inventory levels of such products in the supply chain; changes in demand from significant customers; changes in demand from major markets such as Japan, the U.S., India and China; changes in customer order patterns; changes in product mix; capacity utilization; level of competition; pricing pressure and declines in average selling prices; delays in new product introduction; delays in utility - scale project approval process; delays in utility - scale project construction; continued success in technological innovations and delivery of products with the features customers demand; shortage in supply of materials or capacity requirements; availability of financing; exchange rate fluctuations; litigation and other risks as described in the Company's SEC filings, including its annual report on Form 20 - F filed on April 20, 2016.

Factors that could cause actual results to differ include general business and economic conditions and the state of the solar industry; governmental support for the deployment of solar power; future available supplies of high - purity silicon; demand for end - use products by consumers and inventory levels of such products in the supply chain; changes in demand from significant customers; changes in demand from major markets such as Japan, the U.S., India and China; changes in customer order patterns; changes in product mix; capacity utilization; level of competition; pricing pressure and declines in average selling prices; delays in new product introduction; delays in utility - scale project approval process; delays in utility - scale project construction; cancelation of utility - scale feed - in - tariff contracts in Japan; continued success in technological innovations and delivery of products with the features customers demand; shortage in supply of materials or capacity requirements; availability of financing; exchange rate fluctuations; litigation and other risks as described in the Company's SEC filings, including its annual report on Form 20 - F filed on April 27, 2017.

With $ LULU below key horizontal price support of the $ 60 level, its 40 - week moving average, and recently below the 10 - week moving average as well, the stock could suffer a pretty ugly sell - off over the next several months if broad market conditions continue to deteriorate.

Additionally, despite the recent pullback, gold is trading above its 50 - day and 200 - day moving averages, both of which are critical support levels and indicators of a positive trend.

Natural Gas Natural gas futures were among the quarter's key decliners -LRB--7.5 %, to US$ 2.73 per million British thermal units) as production growth outweighed seasonal consumption and higher exports of the fuel.1 Spot prices saw an even larger drop of 20.6 % (to US$ 2.81) as the support of December's weather - related demand spikes faded and a more normal winter pattern developed.1 Natural gas generally took its downward price cues from elevated US production and growth in the natural gas - focused rig count, which increased from 179 to 194 in March alone.2 Despite the price drop, traders remained optimistic given surging US shale - gas exports and a supply deficit that was 20 % larger than the five - year average at March - end, the biggest in four years.3 Moreover, total natural gas inventories of 1.38 trillion cubic feet were nearly 33 % below their year - ago level.3 Meanwhile, the market appeared focused on an anticipated production surge (2018 is projected to be a record growth year for gas supplies) and may have overlooked intensifying demand as US exports increasingly helped drain supplies.

If it does, bearish momentum could quickly spark a sell - off down to the 50 % Fibonacci retracement level (just above 4,200), which roughly converges with support of the 40 - week / 200 - day moving average.

Notably, above - average rain and snowfall this winter in California has supported high levels of hydropower generation that may also be contributing to recent pricing patterns.

If the 2,087 support level fails to hold, next support is near the 2,065 level, which represents convergence of the rising 50 - day moving average and the 10 - week moving average (similar to 50 - day moving average).

Examples of «factors of confluence» include but are not limited to: strong support and resistance levels, Fibonacci 50 % retracement levels, or moving averages.

The benchmark has been gyrating between resistance at this short - term moving average and support at the 200 - day moving average for the past three weeks, charting large intraday swings as investors attempt to find a level of comfort amongst equity prices.

That lends support to the stock's average 12 - month price target of $ 47, some 17 % higher than its current levels around $ 40.

Euro - wide measures of business confidence are holding above long - run average levels and could help support a continuing recovery.

We also want to focus our attention on key chart levels of support or resistance as well as moving averages, for pull backs.

What we are left with is a daily chart of SPY with two price levels showing support and resistance (in red), and the 50 and 200 day moving average (in blue).

Since forming a «swing high» resistance level on July 12th (see chart above), $ UUP has been selling off for the past four sessions, and is now closing in on near - term support of its 20 - day exponential moving average (EMA).

Even technical analysis supports the extent of the washout in valuations: Just 25 % of the Nikkei 225 Index constituents are above their 50 - day moving averages, which is typically a level that precedes mean reversion and retracement trades.

The S&P 500 closed just below (but not a decisive break of) its 50 - day moving average yesterday, after undercutting its prior «swing lows» at the 1538 - 1539 support level:

Last week's bearish price action caused the main stock market indexes to plunge through major levels of technical price support, including key moving averages and prior «swing lows.»

Other significant support levels include the convergence of the 20 - day and 50 - day moving averages ($ 63.30 — $ 63.50), the 200 - day moving average ($ 60.92), the June 28th swing low ($ 61.54) and the June 4th swing low ($ 60.04).

The Dow Jones Industrial Average undercut its 10 - day MA on Friday and if it loses support of this level (12,927), it will likely find it next resting place at the 12,880 mark (20 - day EMA).

Up front we have a few world - class players surrounded by some serious pretenders... Sanchez is by far the most accomplished player in our attack but the controversy surrounding his contractual mishandling could see him go before the window closes or most definitely by season's end... obviously a mistake by both parties involved, as Sanchez's exploits have never been more on display than in North London, but the club's irresponsible wage structure and lack of real intent have been the real undoing in this mess... Lacazette, who I think has some world - class skills as a front man, will only be as good as the players and system around him, which is troubling due to our current roster and Wenger's love of sideways passing... Walcott should have been sold years ago, enough said, and Welbeck should never have been brought in from the get - go... both of these players have suffered numerous injuries over their respective careers and neither are good enough to overcome such difficulties: not to mention, they both are below average first - touch players, which should be the baseline test for any player coming to a Wenger - led Arsenal team... Perez should have been played wide left or never purchased at all; what a huge waste of time and money, which is ridiculous considering our penny pinching ways and the fact that fans had been clamoring for a real striker for years... finally Giroud, the fact that he stills wears the jersey is a direct indictment of this club's failure to get things right... this isn't necessarily an attack on Giroud because I think he has some highly valued skills, but not for a team that has struggled to take their sideways soccer to the next level, as his presence slows their game even more, combined with our average, at best, finishing skills... far too often those in charge have either settled or chosen half - measures and ultimately it is us that suffer because no matter what happens Wenger, Gazidis and Kroenke will always make more money whereas we will always be the ones paying for their mistakes... so every time someone suggests we should just shut - up and support the team just think of all the sacrifices you've made along the way and simply reply... f *** off

I will be in total support of selling Ozil to Bayern Munich, if Ozil continue with his below average performance up to December without changing gear to high performance level, that is expected of him.

This should come as little surprise for Liverpool fans, for if Lallana were to maintain this level of goals and assists — having scored and created a goal in the four fixtures since the above graph — he would have progressed from average to elite level output without the core shot data to support it.

(As a mom who suffered through months of colic, health issues with my son, no household help, and very little support, anyone who has the audacity — considering the level of privilege that she enjoys — to say,» «The baby's been way easier than everyone made it out to be» should be forced to spend a day in the life of an average mom.)

Southern was selected for the grant based on the number of students that qualify for free or reduced priced meals, average daily participation in the school breakfast program, and district and school - level support.

find agencies in their area both by postcode or by name; rate agencies using a simple star rating system on levels of pay, quality of training, ease of finding work and support received; write reviews, explaining their experiences, both good and bad, of the agency, or agencies, they have used; read reviews written by other supply teachers, including viewing their star rating and seeing the average levels of pay that are offered; add new supply agencies as and when they open; and participate in regular polls, highlighting the key issues that affect supply teachers.

With an average polling of just 11 % and forecasts predicting a loss of 34 seats the party are meeting to develop a manifesto capable of winning back the levels of support experienced in 2010 (when the party received 23.5 % of the vote and 57 seats).

The report's authors, who also include scientists from federal agencies, Columbia University and the South Florida Water Management District, concluded that evidence supports a «worst - case» global average sea - level rise of about 8.2 feet by 2100.

Because the question how many people can the earth support is an incomplete question, and doesn't take account of with what technologies, at what average level of well - being, with what distribution of income, with what political and economic institutions.»

Similarly, the 50 U.K. districts with the highest levels of fear and anxiety demonstrated an average of 60 percent support for the Brexit, with the lowest 50 districts supporting Brexit at the 46 percent level.

But 56 percent of independents thought teacher unions had «done more harm than good,» 54 percent supported school vouchers, and only 34 percent favored raising teacher salaries, once they had been informed about average salary levels in their state.

Happier students tend to report positive relations with their teachers and students in «happy» schools (schools where students» life satisfaction is above the average in the country) report much higher levels of support from their teacher than students in «unhappy» schools.

In 2010, 75 percent support the idea, regardless of whether they are informed of average state salary levels.

Informed respondents living in above - average districts, however, actually back higher salaries for teachers (if uninformed of current levels) and give greater support to teachers unions.

Just 20 percent of the public oppose publishing average test scores at the school level, with another 20 percent expressing neither support nor opposition (Q. 6).

For example, Florida law gives all parents with a child in special education the option of finding a private school with support to the same level as the average spent statewide on students with that disability.

Under a state «equalization formula,» Colorado school districts are guaranteed a level of support at a fixed dollar amount per pupil, based on average daily attendance.

The study also found support for the premise that students placed at risk of academic failure could achieve at levels that met national averages.

For those children with disabilities or students from families with incomes less than 185 percent of the federal poverty level ($ 44,863 for a family of four), students will receive 100 percent of the statewide average basic support per - pupil, or around $ 5,700.

For families with incomes exceeding 185 percent of the federal poverty level, the funding amount is 90 percent of the statewide average basic support per pupil, or around $ 5,100.