Not exact matches
While average highway fuel economy is estimated at 30
mpg, between my aforementioned over-zealous use of Sport mode and my lead foot I logged my roughly 1,000 - mile trip at closer to an
average of 23.5
mpg.
While the
average fuel consumption dropped by 11.9 percent to a highly theoretical (at this stage) 21.6
mpg combined for city and highway driving, maximum torque increased to 664 lb - ft — on tap from 1,250 to 4,500 rpm.
Associate web editor Donny Nordlicht
averaged an indicated 33
mpg on his daily commute,
while New York bureau chief Jamie Kitman said, «The trip computer showed that I clocked an absolutely sick 37
mpg on the admittedly fuel - economy - friendly Detroit - Pittsburgh - New York highway run.
Staff
averages —
while hauling everything from 4500 pounds of Porsche track car and trailer to 2000 pounds of pop - up camper — ranged from 10 to 16
mpg.
Even better, the giant 20 - gallon fuel tank let us cruise long distances
while the V - 6
averaged about 27.5
mpg.
The 1.6 - litre is a more attractive option: its 134bhp gets the car from 0 - 62mph in 10.1 seconds,
while it
averages 72.4
mpg and emits 102g / km of CO2.
On one particular route — nearly 100 miles through Switzerland, including country roads, highways and some city running — we managed 157
mpg at an
average speed of more than 50 mph
while, at times, pulling some brisk overtaking maneuvers.
The 1.2 - litre 108bhp petrol manages the same 64.2
mpg,
while the 128bhp petrol
averages 58.9
mpg for both the manual and automatic variants.
While monitoring the trip computer, I was impressed to see freeway
average fuel economy hitting 35
mpg.
The 2012 Volkswagen Golf diesel has an Environmental Protection Agency
average of 34
mpg,
while the gasoline - powered 2012 Hyundai Elantra
averages 33
mpg.
While the automaker says the M2
averages 7.9 liters per 100 km (EU) or 21
mpg combined (US) with the M DCT gearbox, the lowest figure we saw on the trip computer was 13.5 l / 100 km (equivalent to 17.4
mpg US).
Driving back from Kentucky, I
averaged 31
mpg while my wife said «it felt like a luxury car compared to my older vette».
Speaking of the car's fuel efficiency, the Passat ran at an
average of 45 mph
while consuming 74.88 US
mpg or 3.4 liters / 100 km, breaking its previous combined
average of 53.46 US
mpg or 4.40 liter / 100 km.
While the F - 350's fuel mileage isn't rated by the EPA, we
averaged a remarkable 15.3
mpg during a week with the F - 350 Powerstroke with the electronically controlled automatic transmission.
Around town, the A3 2.0 T achieves 24
mpg,
while the combined
average is 27
mpg.
The addition of Quattro all - wheel - drive decreases city, highway, and overall fuel economy by 1 or 2
mpg in each category, but thanks to a reduced overall weight and a lower drag coefficient, the 2017 A4 gets better
average mileage all around than the outgoing model
while also producing more power and torque.
It delivers an
average fuel consumption of 3.5 l / 100 km (67
mpg US) and CO2 emissions of 79 g / km,
while allowing customers frequent electric driving mode.
In F Sport trim, the 2014 Lexus CT 200h handles well and looks sharp,
while average fuel economy tops 40
mpg.
The Good In F Sport trim, the 2014 Lexus CT 200h handles well and looks sharp,
while average fuel economy tops 40
mpg.
Average fuel consumption is just 8.1 liters (29.04 US
mpg)
while performance remains impressive.
The 4 - liter V - 8 offers plenty of power
while remaining relatively efficient, turning in
average fuel economy around 20
mpg.
Not the most advanced power plant, its variable valve timing helps it turn out 290 horsepower and 260 pound - feet of torque,
while getting fuel economy
averaging around 20
mpg.
The 79bhp 1.2 - litre engine returns a claimed
average of 57.
mpg and emits 115g / km of CO2,
while the high - power engine actually returns better fuel economy figures, of 68.9
mpg and 95g / km of CO2.
The hybrid drivetrain combined very good fuel economy, about 10
mpg on
average better than the old G37
while picking up substantial power.
We have taken it on several road trips and enjoyed the car immensely
while averaging over 40
mpg.
While the higher trim levels may cost you more up front, they come equipped as standard with the CVT transmission which offers a very good combined 35
mpg compared to the 30
mpg average you would achieve with the base trim's manual transmission.
HERE»S WHAT I DO N'T LIKE: Loud wind noise (anytime I exceed 40 - 45 mph), makes it hard to hear the radio at normal volume; intrusive road noise, which I corrected by swapping out the standard Goodyear tires with Continental tires; lackluster acceleration for a V6 engine, CVT tends to lose momentum when you lift your foot off of the gas pedal — often jerky when accelerating and decelerating
while in motion and when accelerating from a dead stop; as mentioned by another reviewer, accelerator hesitates before catching when shifting from reverse to drive; bumps in the road are not well absorbed (the 2016 model may have addressed this issue); no power to windows after you shut off the engine; no auto door locks; poor V6 fuel efficiency
averaging around 24
MPGs combined; trunk lid's arms and safety feature makes it heavy and sometimes hard to lift open; Infotainment system does understand most voice commands; and Harmon Kardon speakers are sometimes crackly.
Skoda claims the 90 PS (89 hp) 1.4 - liter TDI unit
averages as low as 3.4 l / 100 km (69.1
mpg US) on the combined cycle with the manual transmission,
while the 105 PS (104 hp) version is officially rated at 3.6 l / 100 km (65.3
mpg US).
As a result, the car is able to drive on electric power alone at speeds of up to 120 km / h (75 mph) and for a distance of up to 30 kilometres (approx. 20 miles),
while recording
average fuel consumption figures of less than 3.8 l / 100 kilometres (more than 74.3
mpg imp) in the EU test cycle.
While the fuel efficiency is
average at about 18
mpg, E85 fuel is acceptable in this vehicle.
I
averaged 35.1
Mpg for the whole trip, that included city, highway, and idling for a
while.
The upgraded engine and five - speed automatic transmission are fine, and
while fuel mileage isn't that good — 15
mpg in the city, 20
mpg on the highway — it's about
average considering the full - time four - wheel - drive.
With the two tanks of gas used to complete the road trip, the 3
averaged 31.2
mpg,
while later tanks consisting of mostly city mileage produce roughly 27
mpg with my heavy right foot.
During my week of testing, which included lots of highway miles loaded up with cargo
while helping a friend move, I
averaged 48.1
mpg.
During my testing, I
averaged 18.3
mpg over a cycle that mostly consisted of casually - paced freeway cruising
while enjoying the quiet cabin and the clear Bose audio system.
In Consumer Guide ® testing, an ATS sedan with the 2.0 - liter turbo and manual transmission returned 23.7
mpg in 65 - percent highway driving,
while an ATS coupe with the 2.0 and automatic
averaged 21.3
mpg in 85 - percent city driving.
On
average, we get approximately 15
mpg - 13
while hauling a trailer or heavy loads, and 18 highway.
The Avalon is rated at 19
mpg city, 28
mpg highway,
while the Impala (with the 3.5 - liter V - 6) is rated at 18
mpg city, 29
mpg highway, giving both cars the same
average fuel economy.
While Audi communicates an
average fuel consumption as low as 4.4 l / 100 km according to the NEDC standard (equivalent to 53.4
mpg US) for the A4 2.0 TDI quattro S tronic, in real life the results are not that spectacular.
In Consumer Guide ® testing, an all - wheel - drive V6 - powered Genesis
averaged 22.7
mpg in mostly highway driving,
while a V8 - powered model
averaged an unimpressive 16.3
mpg in a near - even split of city and highway driving.
In Consumer Guide ® testing, a Prius Three
averaged 47.5
mpg in a cold - weather winter test that consisted of 65 - percent city driving,
while a Prius Four Touring
averaged 52.6
mpg in 65 - percent city driving in moderate temps.
While cruising down the freeway at 65 mph, I noted the trip computer holding an
average of 32
mpg.
The 2018 Volvo S60 T5 Sedan boasts impressive fuel efficiency,
averaging 36
mpg highway in addition to providing the Engine Automatic Stop - Start feature which will improve fuel efficiency
while driving in the city.
This project not only proved that the new type of synthetic diesel fuel is capable of fueling a car at great distances, but it also was able to boost up the A3 TDI's mileage rating at 42 miles per gallon — one car was able to
average 43
mpg while the other A3 TDI scored 39.7
mpg.
The 1.33 liter Dual VVT - i gasoline engine generates 73 kW / 99 DIN hp and maximum torque of 128 N · m (94 lb - ft) at 3,800 rpm,
while returning an
average fuel consumption of 6.0 L / 100 km (39
mpg US) and CO2 emissions of 139 g / km.
Under the hood there's a new 4.9 - liter, sequential port fuel - injected engine that pumps out 200 horsepower
while delivering an
average of 22.5
mpg.
While extracting a total system output of 185 kW / 252 hp from its duo of power units, the BMW 330e returns
average fuel consumption (combined) of 2.1 — 1.9 litres / 100 km (134.5 — 148.7
mpg imp) and CO2 emissions (combined) of 49 — 44 g / km (in the EU test cycle).
Just completed 520 trip in 8 hours
averaging 65 mph and 31.7
mpg while cruising at 80 mph.
This 2.4 - liter four - cylinder may not sound like much, but it moved the car along adroitly
while delivering an
average fuel economy of 23.6
mpg for our mixed city and freeway driving.
Supercharged V6 gasoline models return 19
mpg combined (17 city / 23 highway)
while the V8
averages 16
mpg combined (14 city / 19 highway).