Between 1967 and 2007, the US economy grew at
an average nominal rate of 7.3 % per annum.
Not exact matches
After accounting for the impacts of measures and adjustments, the Sales Tax revenue base is projected to grow at an
average annual
rate of 4.3 per cent over the forecast period, roughly consistent with the
average annual growth in
nominal consumption of 4.0 per cent over this period.
It shows that higher
nominal interest
rates historically corresponded with above
average annual alpha for the HFRI FWI.
Table 3 shows the changes in the
average private sector economic forecasts for
nominal GDP (the most applicable tax base for budgetary revenues), and for short - and long - term interest
rates, from the first estimate of the deficit to the final outcome.
Since the
average nominal wage
rate has now risen to $ 21 an hour, the amount given back by the borrower is still equivalent to 1,000 hours of labour - time.
Because low - risk investments return roughly 20 % on
average in a country with 20 %
nominal GDP growth, financial repression means that the benefits of growth are unfairly distributed between savers (who get just the deposit
rate, say 3 %), banks, who get the spread between the lending and the deposit
rate (say 3.5 %) and the borrower, who gets everything else (13.5 % in this case, assuming he takes little risk — even more if he takes risk).
Their studies suggested that among developing countries
nominal lending
rates had on
average been around two - thirds on
nominal GDP growth
rates (although China, at around one - third, was still well below anyone else's at the time).
At a federal - provincial finance ministers» meeting in December 2012, the Finance Minister announced that, starting in 2017 - 18, the
rate of growth in the Canada Health Transfer (CHT) would be reduced from 6 per cent per year to grow in line with a three - year moving
average in
nominal GDP, with a funding guarantee to grow by at least three per cent per year.
Originally, the Liberals adjusted the private sector
average forecasts (lower real and
nominal GDP and increased interest
rates).
Nominal interest
rates (bills)
averaged 4.1 % for a real
average interest
rate of 0.9 %.
This is the difference between the 5 - year
nominal treasury yield and the 5 - year TIPs yield and is suppose to reflect treasury market's forecast for the
average annual inflation
rate over the next five years.
«
Nominal EERs are calculated as geometric weighted
averages of bilateral exchange
rates.
BIS says: «
Nominal EERs are calculated as geometric weighted
averages of bilateral exchange
rates.
(a)
Average of nominal interest rates on outstanding loans (fixed and variable); pre terms of trade boom average is 1993/94 — 2002/03; year - ended observation is the June quarter 2016 average (b) Consumer price data exclude interest charges prior to September quarter 1998 and deposit & loan facilities to June quarter 2011, and are adjusted for the tax changes of 1999 — 2000 (c) Pre terms of trade boom average is 1997/98 —
Average of
nominal interest
rates on outstanding loans (fixed and variable); pre terms of trade boom
average is 1993/94 — 2002/03; year - ended observation is the June quarter 2016 average (b) Consumer price data exclude interest charges prior to September quarter 1998 and deposit & loan facilities to June quarter 2011, and are adjusted for the tax changes of 1999 — 2000 (c) Pre terms of trade boom average is 1997/98 —
average is 1993/94 — 2002/03; year - ended observation is the June quarter 2016
average (b) Consumer price data exclude interest charges prior to September quarter 1998 and deposit & loan facilities to June quarter 2011, and are adjusted for the tax changes of 1999 — 2000 (c) Pre terms of trade boom average is 1997/98 —
average (b) Consumer price data exclude interest charges prior to September quarter 1998 and deposit & loan facilities to June quarter 2011, and are adjusted for the tax changes of 1999 — 2000 (c) Pre terms of trade boom
average is 1997/98 —
average is 1997/98 — 2002/03
If I assume a dividend growth
rate of 6 percent (about the long - run
average *), the current S&P 500 dividend yield of 2.1 percent (from multpl.com), a terminal S&P 500 dividend yield of 4 percent (Hussman says that the dividend yield on stocks has historically
averaged about 4 percent), the expected
nominal return over ten years is 2.4 percent annually.
This is a percentage point lower than
average potential growth in the decade prior to the crisis... We estimate that the real neutral policy
rate is currently in the range of 1 to 2 per cent... This translates into a
nominal neutral policy
rate of 3 to 4 per cent, down from a range of 4 1/2 to 5 1/2 per cent in the period prior to the crisis.»
2
Average of
nominal interest
rates on outstanding loans (fixed and variable).
In that case the economy would need to slow two full percentage points, to a
nominal growth
rate of 3.6 %, to match the longer - term
average.
A stable ratio of credit to GDP would require that they both grow at the same
rate, but international evidence suggests that it is not unusual for credit to grow, on
average, a little faster than
nominal GDP.
During this period, a smoothed
average of
nominal growth explains almost 60 % of the variation in long - term
rates (see the chart below).
The
nominal and real cash
rates are now both close to their
average levels of the past decade.
By historical standards, 2 percent is a small pay hike on a
nominal basis — although, as noted, it is still ahead of the current and recent
average inflation
rate.
The company's
nominal rate and APR were both no better than
average, with the big banks providing better numbers in more than one instance.
If I assume a dividend growth
rate of 6 percent (about the long - run
average *), the current S&P 500 dividend yield of 2.1 percent (from multpl.com), a terminal S&P 500 dividend yield of 4 percent (Hussman says that the dividend yield on stocks has historically
averaged about 4 percent), the expected
nominal return over ten years is 2.4 percent annually.
Also given the low growth, low inflation and low interest
rate environment and the somewhat above
average valuation numbers, one has to expect lower
nominal returns from equities as compared to the past.
After accounting for inflation, there's a one - in - three chance that you won't get your investment back with a cash savings account, reports Betterment, because
nominal cash interest
rates have recently been
averaging around 1 percent or less.
During the past century, the
average rate of inflation was 3.3 percent per year, reducing the
nominal 5 percent earnings growth
rate to a real growth
rate of just 1.7 percent.
In that case the economy would need to slow two full percentage points, to a
nominal growth
rate of 3.6 %, to match the longer - term
average.
Dividend Growth to the Rescue Since inflation
averages around 3.0 % per year, the required
nominal dividend growth
rates are 4.0 % and 5.5 %.