Sentences with phrase «average number of citations»
Impact factor refers to the average number of citations to the articles in a journal.
https://link.springer.com/
The Impact Factor shows the average number of citations to articles in each journal (citations to a journal divided by the number... [more]
The Impact Factor shows the average number of citations to articles in each journal (citations to a journal divided by the number of articles the journal published).
The impact factor is a measure of the average number of citations per article, so the higher the number, the more «important» the journal is to the scientific community in that field.
The metric - which ranks journals by the average number of citations their articles attract in a set period, usually the preceding two years - has become «an obsession in world science», says a coalition of academics, editors, publishers and research funders, in a declaration published on 16 May.
So the average number of citations is often highly misleading.
Not exact matches
They compared these citation numbers to those of 759 control authors who had published in the same journal and issue as a retracted author and found that, on average, authors who had a retraction went on to garner approximately 10 % fewer citations than the control authors did.
For example, if the citation counts of articles were like the heights of people, then the average number would be informative.
The citation distributions are so skewed that up to 75 % of the articles in any given journal had lower citation counts than the journal's average number.
Average number of publications and citations at the time of application varied significantly by race and ethnicity.
Using a dataset of 1,372 climate researchers and their publication and citation data, Anderegg et al. (2010) found a similar result to Doran and Zimmerman, that between 97 % to 98 % of climate experts support the consensus, and that the average number of publications by the «skeptics» is around half the number by scientists convinced by the evidence of human - caused global warming.
Looking at the number of citations received by each climate expert's top four papers, the authors find that members of the «convinced» group rack up an average of 172 citations on each one, while the «unconvinced» get 105.
At the same time, the journal in many fields grew into the primary measure of reputation, as journal ranking could be carefully calculated by Impact Factor (average number of times an article is cited within a two - year period), in way not possible with books (for which there was no citation index).