Readers can draw their own conclusions with data in hand, but this much we know: In the fall of 2002, Edison was assigned to manage 20 schools in Philadelphia with
an average proficiency of only 6 percent.
Not exact matches
He does the dirty work often that goes unnoticed by the
average fan but his magnificent success as a receiver out
of the backfield is uniquely tied to his
proficiency as a blocker... let me explain
At 32 city elementary and middle schools, the
average English - math
proficiency rate on state exams has not exceeded 10 percent
of students...
These answers are processed through the toolkit's statistical model to produce a result which shows where the child is situated in terms
of the
average level
of proficiency across the UK.
They also do not differ significantly in their initial per - pupil spending,
average class size, percentage
of students receiving subsidized school lunches, percentage
of students with limited English
proficiency or disabilities, and the mobility
of their student populations.
Districts that are higher performing by this indicator actually spend, on
average, no more than the lower performing districts (after adjustment for differences in family income, special - education placements, and the percentage
of students who are
of limited English
proficiency).
After controlling for
average class size, per - pupil spending in 1998 - 99, the percentage
of students with disabilities, the percentage
of students receiving a free or reduced - price school lunch, the percentage
of students with limited English
proficiency, and student mobility rates, high - scoring F schools achieved gains that were 2.5 points greater than their below -
average D counterparts in reading (see Figure 2).
Proficiency rates on the 2015 National Assessment
of Educational Progress (NAEP) among charter students are not only consistently higher than those
of students in their respective district sectors, but many
of these rates compare favorably to the states with the highest
average levels
of performance.
Student performance measures include
average student achievement on reading and math exams, along with median
proficiency and the percentage
of students achieving
proficiency.
These «value - added» measures are subject to some
of the same problems, but by focusing on what students learn over the course
of the year, they are a significant improvement over a simple
average test score (or, worse yet, the percentage
of students that score above an arbitrary «
proficiency» threshold).
We used statistical techniques similar to the one we employed to examine changes in
average scores to assess the effect
of the bonus program on the percentage
of students achieving
proficiency on math and reading exams.
Even worse, across all cohort - one schools, the
average reading -
proficiency increase was a mere five points — a cost
of one billion dollars for each point
of improvement in reading
proficiency.
In reading, across all
of cohort two, the
average school gained just a single point in reading
proficiency.
This will be a huge challenge for students, particularly in high school, as NAEP
proficiency is the equivalent
of an SAT score in verbal and math
of nearly 1200 — or 200 points higher than the
average student taking the SAT today achieves.
Over that two - year period, the
average difference between NAEP and state
proficiency levels decreased from 35 percent to 30 percent, the largest tightening
of state standards in any two - year period since NCLB was first established (see Figure 2).
Chicago — Mastery learning has proved its worth as a method
of teaching reading, especially to students whose
proficiency is below
average, but educators who use the sometimes - controversial method should not regard it as a «quick fix» for poor basic - skills test scores.
Moreover, if an income gap made America unique, you would expect the percentage
of American students performing well below
proficiency in math to be much higher than the percentage
of low performers in countries with
average test scores similar to the United States.
-- The
average difference between NAEP and state
proficiency levels decreased from 35 percentage points to 30 percentage points nationwide, which the authors point out is «the largest tightening
of state standards in any two - year period since NCLB was first established.»
Because the performances
of all students would continue to be reported on the current NAPLAN score scale, it would still be possible to calculate year level
averages, to show how students perform in relation to their year group, and to identify levels
of proficiency that, ideally, all students should reach by particular times in their schooling.
Instead
of using
proficiency rates to gauge achievement, Colorado will take an
average of students» test scores, which sounds simple (like blocking and tackling) because it is simple — assuming you do it.
While the 42 percent rate
of math
proficiency for U.S. white students is much higher than the
averages for students from African American and Hispanic backgrounds, U.S. white students are still surpassed by all students in 16 other countries.
By comparison, states»
average proficiency standards improved by only 2 percentage points between 2009 and 2011, largely due to high grades
of two outlier states.
Looking at each
of the CMOs in the NewSchools portfolio individually, we find that half are producing breakthrough results, with
average proficiency rates that are at least 15 percentage points higher than their local districts.
We address this question here by examining the link between the establishment
of charter schools in North Carolina and
average student
proficiency rates at the traditional public schools most affected by the new source
of competition.
Viewed as a group, schools managed by our CMOs achieve rates
of proficiency on state assessments in reading and math that
average about 9 percentage points higher than those
of schools in their local districts (see Figure 2).
So varied are state standards that the relative rigor
of a state's
proficiency definition is a better predictor
of the percentage
of schools said to be «failing» (not making AYP) than the overall quality
of student performance in the state, as estimated by
average NAEP scores.
The school that stuck with the program (IS 228 in Brooklyn) posted student growth gains on the state assessment that were twice the
average of NYC schools overall in its second year, and
proficiency gains that exceeded both the city and charter school norms.
Although
proficiency standards have climbed overall, an
average difference
of 10 percentage points remains between the state
proficiency levels and the corresponding NAEP
proficiency levels.
The most advanced students in Year 7 have significantly higher levels
of mathematics
proficiency than the
average Year 10 student, and the least advanced students in Year 10 have significantly lower levels
of mathematics
proficiency than the
average Year 7 student.
Even more impressive, nearly 80 percent
of the states»
proficiency rates are within 15 percentage points
of the NAEP rates, with only one state possessing an
average proficiency rate differing from the NAEP standard by more than 40 percentage points.
-- In an international math test taken by students worldwide in 1995 (the Third International Mathematics and Science Study, or TIMSS), U.S. student math
proficiency for 8th graders fell below the international
average (28th out
of 41 countries).
In fourth - grade reading, eighth - grade reading, and eighth - grade math, about one out
of every four students reaches
proficiency in the
average large city.
When charting the
average mathematics scale score and percentage
of students eligible for free and reduced - price lunch in the 4th and 8th grades, we find that only nine or fewer states had a smaller percentage
of students than Minnesota below «basic»
proficiency.
Students at PARCC's college - ready cutoff score in math have an 85 percent probability
of earning a math «C»
average or better, whereas students at the MCAS cutoff score for
proficiency in math have only a 62 percent probability
of doing so.
• The
average difference between the proportion
of students achieving
proficiency on NAEP and state tests decreased from 30 percentage points to 10 percentage points nationwide, which the authors describe as «a dramatic improvement over the previous two - year period (2011 - 13), in which the difference dropped only from 35 to 30 percent.»
• On
average, schools with one year
of funding and interventions under their belts saw a two percentage - point gain in reading
proficiency — just about the same gain as all other U.S. schools that didn't get these huge cash infusions.
• On
average, schools with two years
of funding and interventions under their belts saw a three percentage point gain in reading
proficiency — just about the same gain as all other U.S. schools — those that didn't get these huge cash infusions.
The initial minimum
proficiency rate will be the greater
of the
proficiency rate
of the 20th - percentile school or the
average statewide
proficiency rate
of the lowest - scoring subgroup.
Between 1994 and 1999, these states were the educational envy
of the nation, raising
proficiency rates in math and reading by 2 to 5 percentage points in the
average year.
Here it is important to note again that a school's grades are based not on its overall
average scale score but rather on the percentage
of students meeting levels
of proficiency and the percentage
of students making adequate gains on the tests.
Rather than presenting performance as the proportion
of students who have met the minimum -
proficiency cut score, states could present the
average (mean) score
of students within the school and the
average performance
of each subgroup
of students.
The
average proficiency rate in math for black third - graders who attend California public schools without the minimum threshold number
of ELL third - grade students is 46 %.
For instance, the
proficiency rate is calculated by assigning each proficient student a value
of 1 and each non-proficient student a value
of 0 and then taking the
average score across students.
While a number
of schools saw
average proficiency rates from 2012 - 14 in the 80s and even the 90s, no school scored above 82 percent this year (this shows up as white space at the top
of the graph).
National Assessment
of Educational Progress (NAEP)
average scale scores and
proficiency rates are retrieved from http://www.nationsreportcard.gov/.
A simple regression
of the
average grades citizens assign to local schools in each state on NAEP and state
proficiency rates simultaneously confirms that
average grades (1) are strongly correlated with NAEP
proficiency rates and (2) after controlling for NAEP
proficiency rates, have no relationship whatsoever with
proficiency rates on state tests.
We measured actual school quality as the percentage
of students in a school who achieved «
proficiency» in math and reading on the state's accountability exams (taking the
average proficiency rate across the two subjects).
While ESSA mandates
proficiency levels, it leaves states the option
of reporting scores by using
averages or other metrics.
Even after controlling for
proficiency rates and other school characteristics, middle schools receive ratings that are, on
average, 18 percent
of a letter grade lower than comparable elementary schools.
The school settled on the 70 percent
average mastery floor after looking at the New York math and language tests, where
proficiency generally is defined as a score
of 70 percent correct answers.