Sentences with phrase «average return required»

Those results are above the 3.9 per cent average return required to sustain benefits for 75 years.

Deciding whether it's possible to attain above - average returns requires an understanding of EMH.

Average and above - average returns require a significant increase in P / E.

Not exact matches

Trust me, you don't even want to think about the decline required for stocks to deliver the historical average long - term return of 10 %.

So how do conservative investors and pension funds, who require an average of 8 per cent return to remain viable, balance their portfolio without adding more risk?

Since their return from injury i have tried to give Welbeck and Wilshire the benefit of the doubt when others have slagged them off for some pretty average displays.Regrettably I am now of the opinion that they will never reach the standards required to make a meaningful contribution towards the revival of Arsenal and along with 3/4 others in the current squad they should be moved on.Their performances against Stoke was the last straw as far as I am concerned.It will be interesting to see if Gareth Southgate shares my views and does not include them in his World Cup squad.

Ekstrand et al. (2012) found that the grade of the hamstring strain was a key determinant of the time to return - to - sport, with grades from 1 — 4 requiring an average of 8 ± 3 days, 17 ± 10 days, 22 ± 11 days, and 73 ± 60 days, respectively.

That V6 now requires 95 RON premium unleaded fuel and returns a claimed average consumption of 8.7 L / 100 km.

The Internal Revenue Service requires a Schedule B form in a number of situations, but for the average taxpayer, the two most common reasons are earning more than $ 1,500 of interest or dividend income (from savings accounts or stocks, for example) and to exclude the interest you earn on certain U.S. savings bonds from your tax return.

Since an average salaried investor already has some money lying in bank savings, bank fixed deposits and EPFO / NPS and these are all fixed income investments, while investing they should include these in their overall allocation and then determine whether do they require any more of fixed income return streams or do they need to look at Equities for their allocations.

Generally, two years personal tax returns are required to verify the amount of your dividend and / or interest income so an average of the amounts you receive can be calculated.

While some companies require that you continue employment with them for a specified period in return for the funds, average tuition assistance programs can earn you $ 4,500 or more.

However, to simplify the screen I did not require an ETF to be ranked above the combined return of SHY; rather, an ETF simply needed the average of its 13 week / 26 week / 52 week total return to be greater than 0 % (the «absolute» momentum filter).

While the annualized (geometric average) return is different from the arithmetic average required in the SR calculation, it should suffice as a rough equivalent.

Generally, two years of personal tax returns are required to verify the amount of your dividend and / or interest income so that an average amount can be calculated.

When we remember a top manager might beat the market by 1.5 or 2 % a year over this length of time, the returns required by Jensen to pick up managers outperforming the averages were impossibly high.

So 9 % is a very conservative planning assumption at current valuations, is beneath the TSE / TSX index's long - term average return, and an acceleration in inflation is not required to achieve such return.

There must be a way to see the Big Picture and lighten up on areas that are over-valued, but still enjoy an average return at least approaching that of the market as a whole... I'd love to hear some simple strategies that require a little thought, and don't just focus on keeping a lot of money in cash and short term bonds.

e.g. on a universe of all liquid stocks with pretty generous liquidity filters (price > $ 1, mcap > $ 100 million, on the market for at least 1 year, inflation - adjusted daily dollar volume in the last 63 days > $ 100,000), before friction, and hold for 5 days (no other sell rule), tested on all start dates Sept 2, 1997 forward to Aug 18, 2015 and then averaged CAGR, leaving an average of 3360 stocks in the universe to then test: a. 17.6 % cagr bottom 5 % of stocks left by bad 4 day return (requiring price > ma200 was slightly worse than this at 17.4 %; but requiring price < ma5 was better at 18.1 %) b. 16.0 % cagr bottom 5 % of stocks left by bad 5 day return c. 14.6 % cagr bottom 5 % by rsi (2) d. 14.7 % cagr for rsi (2) < 5 I have tested longer backtests on simpler liquidity filters (since my tests can't use all of the above filters on very long tests) and this still holds true: bad return in the last 4 or 5 days beats low rsi (2) for 1 week holds.

If that was the case it wouldn't really be the intrinsic value, because it's obvious that it's way better than what anyone can get from the average market, or in other words, it's much better than most people required rate of return.

For implied volatility it is okey to use Black and scholes but what to do with the historical volatility which carry the effect of past prices as a predictor of future prices.And then precisely the conditional historical volatility.i suggest that you must go with the process like, for stock returns 1) first download stock prices into excel sheet 2) take the natural log of (P1 / po) 3) calculate average of the sample 4) calculate square of (X-Xbar) 5) take square root of this and you will get the standard deviation of your required data.

The law requires this limit to be adjusted each year to reflect the changes in the national average home price; however, declining home prices led to legislators clarifying that the baseline loan limit could not rise again until the average U.S. home price returned to its pre-decline level.

Wonderful companies compound wealth over time, while fair companies may have short - term gains but lack the deep competitive advantage required to fend off competition and generate above average returns for decades.

The larger the required margin of safety the higher the probability of an above average rate of return.

Requiring a minimum 20 % return pa over 5 years gives the maximum current price you should pay now (which can be used as estimate of intrinsic value) of A) 14.55 p, B) 21.87 p and C) 29.12 p. Scenario B) comes up with a very similar figure to your average estimate of 22.8 p.

Because carry and value require longer holding periods to harvest the factors» returns, the authors take the extra step of setting those strategy portfolios» monthly weights to the trailing average of the prior -12-months model weights.

That really does seem reasonable, but it also means that you, as an average filer, have a chance of making one mistake in your lifetime that will require an amended return.

A good basic grounding in investing theory and a solid grasp of markets is all that is required to get a «better than average» return by managing costs.

For our example, with AAA bonds at 5 %, investors would on average require an 8 % return to even consider committing money to stocks.

When I compared the price of the packages to the number of points required, I found that it returned about 1.8 cents per point, which is well above average.

If I had done the energy accounting as is done with sugarcane ethanol, one could state that the energy return of gasoline is actually only the initial energy required to get the oil out of the ground, which averages about 17/1 worldwide.

And therefore it requires different tactics from that of the ordinary Ponzi scheme, such as offering returns only moderately above average, satisfying redemption requests promptly, turning down some would - be investors (it would be interesting to know whether there was a tendency to turn down investors who might prove nosy or suspicious), and trading on a reputation earned in a legitimate business (Madoff's business of market making).

In this case, while it remains theoretically possible to realize a ten - year average return equal to the 1 percent floor (a result that would require the S&P 500 Index to produce an actual return of 1 percent or less for ten straight years), this never occurred in any of the 85 rolling ten - year periods dating back to 1920.

If you know what kind of return you want to achieve or the average return on similar properties, published frequently for commercial real estate investment, then you can find an approximate value by dividing the NOI by required return (NOI / return rate).