Sentences with phrase «average surface temperature of the planet»

However, the average surface temperature of the planet seems to have increased far more slowly over this period than it did over the previous decades.

By showing that (a) there are no common physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious atmospheric greenhouse effects, (b) there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature of a planet, (c) the frequently mentioned difference of 33 C is a meaningless number calculated wrongly, (d) the formulas of cavity radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the assumption of a radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to zero, the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsified

For example, «Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere, along with a handful of other gases, plays a central role in determining the average surface temperature of our planet.

By showing that (a) there are no common physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious atmospheric greenhouse effects, (b) there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature of a planet, (c) the frequently mentioned difference of 33 C is a meaningless number calculated wrongly, (d) the formulas of cavity radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the assumption of a radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to zero, the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsified

Here's an example of your general illogic: Suppose we had a time period in which the planet's albedo decreased (fewer clouds or aerosols, let's say) but the average surface temperature of the planet also decreased.

«According to the radiative - convective equilibrium concept, the equation for determining global average surface temperature of the planet is

This will surely make the average surface temperature of the planet higher, than if there was no atmosphere (because the cold shadow areas are now warmer, resulting in a higher average temperatures.)

By showing that (a) there are no c ommon physical laws between the warming phenomenon in glass houses and the fictitious atmospheric greenhouse effect b) there are no calculations to determine an average surface temperature of a planet, (c) the frequently mentioned difference of 33 C a meaningless number calculated wrongly, (d) the formulas of cavity radiation are used inappropriately, (e) the assumption of a radiative balance is unphysical, (f) thermal conductivity and friction must not be set to zero, the atmospheric greenhouse conjecture is falsified.

Not exact matches

At that time, the average temperature at the planet's surface would have approached the boiling point of water — 100 degrees Celsius, about 75 degrees higher than today.

Planet Mercury has an average surface temperature of 350 °F!

Cooling sea - surface temperatures over the tropical Pacific Ocean — part of a natural warm and cold cycle — may explain why global average temperatures have stabilized in recent years, even as greenhouse gas emissions have been warming the planet.

Global average air temperature near the surface is dominated by the ocean (because it covers two thirds of the planet), particularly at low latitudes.

First they said the Mars and Venus measurements weren't measured, just computed; then they said we couldn't measure temperatures on other planets; then they said we'd need billions of measurements to estimate average surface temperature.

The global temperature record represents an average over the entire surface of the planet.

Thus, as more energy accumulates in the lower - troposphere averaged over the whole planet, we would expect the temperatures of the near - surface troposphere to increase.

Indeed, things do seem to be warming up as the Earth's average surface temperature climbed to a record high in 1995, continuing a pattern of hotter mean temperatures for our planet.

While none of the numbers may sound large to laypeople, they are averages for the surface temperature of the entire planet, and therefore represent enormous additions of heat to the Earth.

In short, as far as Jones knew in February 2010 - and as the keeper of the Hadley - CRU surface temperature record he was surely in a very good position to know - the planet hadn't warmed on average over the decade.

While I don't doubt the way the amount of IR absorption by CO2 increases due to spectral detuning (I'll accept the quantum mechanics expert's opinions on that), for the life of me I can't see why that should carry over to the average surface Temperature of the whole planet.

For all of its warnings, and despite a steady escalation of greenhouse gas emissions into the atmosphere, the planet's average surface temperature has remained pretty much the same for the last 15 years.

Global warming refers to an increase in the average temperature of the Earth as a result of the greenhouse effect, in which gases in the upper atmosphere trap solar radiation close to the planet's surface instead of allowing it to dissipate into space.

Since most of the planet's surface is ocean, an unusually cool ocean surface temperature lowers the overall average.

What they found is that the globally averaged surface temperature trend over 15 - year periods is closely related to the trend of the sea surface temperature in a small region of the planet, the Nino3.4 region, statistically.

Specifically, the term is defined as how much the average global surface temperature will increase if there is a doubling of greenhouse gases (expressed as carbon dioxide equivalents) in the air, once the planet has had a chance to settle into a new equilibrium after the increase occurs.