(6) The GCM models built by the CIC have consistently greatly overestimated the effects of CO2 on global
average temperatures over a period of over 25 years.
Not exact matches
The
average daily maximum
temperature during the pup - rearing
period was roughly 1 °C higher in the first 12 years of monitoring than in the second 12 years, and
over the same
period the
average number of pups surviving per pack per year fell from five to three.
However, the
average surface
temperature of the planet seems to have increased far more slowly
over this
period than it did
over the previous decades.
Because the models predict little
average precipitation increase nationwide
over this
period, the product of CAPE and precipitation gives about a 12 percent rise in cloud - to - ground lightning strikes per degree in the contiguous U.S., or a roughly 50 percent increase by 2100 if Earth sees the expected 4 - degree Celsius increase (7 degrees Fahrenheit) in
temperature.
However, make no mistake, the globe's
average temperature has still risen
over that
period (including record heat in 2014) and
temperatures now are the hottest they've been since recordkeeping began in the 1880s.
Over a
period of forty years the
average temperature near Felbrigg Hall has risen with 1.15 degrees Celsius.
U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend LINK WASHINGTON, Jan. 25 — After examining climate data extending back nearly 100 years, a team of Government scientists has concluded that there has been no significant change in
average temperatures or rainfall in the United States
over that entire
period.
Global mean
temperatures averaged over land and ocean surfaces, from three different estimates, each of which has been independently adjusted for various homogeneity issues, are consistent within uncertainty estimates
over the
period 1901 to 2005 and show similar rates of increase in recent decades.
However, make no mistake, the globe's
average temperature has still risen
over that
period (including
Global
average surface
temperatures increased on
average by about 0.6 degrees Celsius
over the
period 1956 - 2006.
More than 95 % of the 5 yr running mean of the surface
temperature change since 1850 can be replicated by an integration of the sunspot data (as a proxy for ocean heat content), departing from the
average value
over the
period of the sunspot record (~ 40SSN), plus the superimposition of a ~ 60 yr sinusoid representing the observed oceanic oscillations.
Item 8 could be confusing in having so many messages: «It is extremely likely that more than half of the observed increase in global
average surface
temperature from 1951 to 2010 was caused by the anthropogenic increase in greenhouse gas... The best estimate of the human - induced contribution to warming is similar to the observed warming
over this
period....
El Niño: A phenomenon in the equatorial Pacific Ocean characterized by a positive sea surface
temperature departure from normal (for the 1971 - 2000 base
period) in the Niño 3.4 region greater than or equal in magnitude to 0.5 degrees C (0.9 degrees Fahrenheit),
averaged over three consecutive months.
Compared to the
average temperatures from the 1951 to 1980
period, the largest unusually warm areas
over all of 2004 were in Alaska, near the Caspian Sea, and
over the Antarctic Peninsula.
«We show that the climate
over the 21st century can and likely will produce
periods of a decade or two where the globally
averaged surface air
temperature shows no trend or even slight cooling in the presence of longer - term warming,» the paper says, adding that, «It is easy to «cherry pick» a
period to reinforce a point of view.»
The 2007 IPCC report highlights surface
temperature projections for the
period 2090 - 2099 under a business - as - ususal scenario that reveals +5 °C to +7 °C warming warming of annually
average temperatures over much of Eurasia under an aggressive A2 scenario.
The difference between these
temperatures and the
average temperature over some arbitrary
period AT THAT STATION is called a
temperature anomoly.
Jim Hansen, et al, did a great study showing that
average summer
temperatures that are 3 standard deviations («3 - sigma») above the 1951 - 1980 baseline have increased
over 100X since the baseline
period.
If you have a reconstruction of annual
average temperatures at a location
over the past 1000 yrs with an error range of, say, + / -0.3 deg C in the proxy data, and the net
temperature change
over that time
period is 1.0 deg C from the proxy data, your counts and timing of records are going to be heavily dependent on errors.
This paper is based on 6 monthly globally
averaged temperature series
over the common
period 1880 - 2012 using data that were publically available in May 2015.
The
average temperature each year fluctuates by a considerable amount and to see an effect one has to
average over some
period of time just as the technical analysts of the stock market look at the moving
average over some number of day to discern trends.
(Mirriam and Websters define climate as: 2 a: the
average course or condition of the weather at a place usually
over a
period of years as exhibited by
temperature, wind velocity, and precipitation.)
The HadCRUT4 dataset, compiled from many thousands of
temperature measurements taken across the globe, from all continents and all oceans, is used to estimate global
temperature, shows that 2017 was 0.99 ± 0.1 °C above pre-industrial levels, taken as the
average over the
period 1850 - 1900, and 0.38 ± 0.1 °C above the 1981 - 2010
average.
So
over a
period of 138 years, the increase in the YEARLY
AVERAGE of the
temperature of the ENTIRE EARTH is 0.8 degrees.
Figure 6: Easterbrook's two global
temperature projections A (green) and B (blue) vs. the IPCC TAR simple model projection tuned to seven global climate models for emissions scenario A2 (the closest scenario to reality thus far)(red) and observed global surface
temperature change (the
average of NASA GISS, NOAA, and HadCRUT4)(black)
over the
period 2000 through 2011.
Over the
period 1900 - 2013 the range for monthly
average temperature in Helsinki has varied between -16.5 C and +1.4 C in January and between 13.7 C and 21.7 C in July.
As LST closely tracks air
temperatures over the instrumental
period, we can also infer that air
temperatures in this region of East Africa varied in concert with the global
average and thus were controlled primarily by the major forcings influencing
temperatures over this timescale, both natural (solar radiation, volcanism) and anthropogenic (greenhouse - gas emissions; refs 19, 20).
U.S. Data Since 1895 Fail To Show Warming Trend LINK WASHINGTON, Jan. 25 — After examining climate data extending back nearly 100 years, a team of Government scientists has concluded that there has been no significant change in
average temperatures or rainfall in the United States
over that entire
period.
dH / dt was calculated for us as nearly 0.3 W / m2
averaged over this
period, and I took 0.6 C as the
temperature rise in this
period.
The U.S. Climate Extremes Index (USCEI), an index that tracks the highest and lowest 10 percent of extremes in
temperature, precipitation, drought and tropical cyclones across the contiguous U.S., was a record - large 44 percent during the January - June
period,
over twice the
average value.
My understanding is that an Anomaly is the
average temperature variation
over a
period relative to a baseline, if the
temperature is greater it results in a positive anomaly, if it is equal to the baseline then there is zero anomaly and if it is less than the base line it is a negative anomaly.
«Methodology: Historical weather station maximum
temperature data was
averaged over November 22 - 28 for the
period 1996 - 2015 to obtain the 2016 baseline.
In other words, the IPCC
averaged sun activity
over a
period 150 years longer than it
averaged temperatures.
Positive Anomaly
over one
period doesn't mean increasing
temperature,
periods of positive anomaly do, as the ongoing
average increases.
«The
temperature records, that is, the «signal» of warmth that we're reconstructing for this part of the Canadian Arctic
over the past 10,000 years seems to be higher than the global
average for that
period and even higher than the Arctic
average.»
Human civilization developed
over a
period of 10,000 years during which global
average surface
temperatures remained remarkably stable, hovering within one degree Celsius of where they are today.
The IPCC statement that most of the observed increase in global
average temperature since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations» is very much dependent on what weighting was given to natural (mainly solar) forcing
over this
period.
The
temperature at each land and ocean station is compared daily to what is «normal» for that location and time, typically the long - term
average over a 30 - year
period.
Governments adopted a comprehensive package of decisions — including an agreement to initiate a second commitment
period for the Kyoto Protocol and the «Durban Platform» to negotiate a long - term, all inclusive future mitigation regime that includes a process to address the «ambition gap» for stabilizing
average global
temperature increases at 2 degrees Celsius
over pre-industrial levels.
Instrumental
temperature data are shown by a green line (centered to agree with CH - blend
average over the
period 1880 - 1960).
Temperature trends
over the 1989 — 2008
period averaged around circles of latitude for winter (a), spring (b), summer (c) and autumn (d).
southern oscillation a large - scale atmospheric and hydrospheric fluctuation centered in the equatorial Pacific Ocean; exhibits a nearly annual pressure anomaly, alternatively high
over the Indian Ocean and high
over the South Pacific; its
period is slightly variable,
averaging 2.33 years; the variation in pressure is accompanied by variations in wind strengths, ocean currents, sea - surface
temperatures, and precipitation in the surrounding areas
TCR is defined «as the
average temperature response
over a twenty - year
period centered at CO2 doubling in a transient simulation with CO2 increasing at 1 % per year.».
During that same
period,
average annual rainfall in New South Wales declined by 3.6 inches (92 millimeters).3 Scientists think the decline in autumn rainfall in southeast Australia since the late 1950s may be partly due to increases in heat - trapping gases in Earth's atmosphere.3, 14 Major bushfires
over southeast Australia are linked to the positive phase of an ocean cycle called the «Indian Ocean Dipole» — when sea surface
temperatures are warmer than
average in the western Indian Ocean, likely in response to global warming.15, 16
«
Averaged over the five - year
period 2015 - 2019, global
average temperature is expected to remain high and is likely to be between 0.18 °C and 0.46 °C above the long - term (1981 - 2010)
average of 14.3 °C.
This is currently done, as Fred says, by computing anomalies: the
average global
temperature over some
period is chosen to be zero and every other
temperature is referred to that.
Internal variability can only account for ~ 0.3 °C change in
average global surface air
temperature at most
over periods of several decades, and scientific studies have consistently shown that it can not account for more than a small fraction of the global warming
over the past century.
It's not very good for saying «in 2050, the
temperature will be X», but it is useful for determining what range the
average temperature is likely to be within
over, say, a 30 - year
period centered on the date in question (with much uncertainty) given certain starting conditions and certain inputs and changes in forcing
over time, and.
Almost any
average temperature you wish depending on how you slice it and none of it has meaning except in the case that you slice it exactly the same way
over successive measurements
over a long
period of time might tell you something.
As you can see,
over periods of a few decades, modeled internal variability does not cause surface
temperatures to change by more than 0.3 °C, and
over longer
periods, such as the entire 20th Century, its transient warming and cooling influences tend to
average out, and internal variability does not cause long - term
temperature trends.