Not exact matches
On
average, a new federal study shows, charter
schools are no better and in some cases worse
than regular public
schools, but KIPP's test scores show it to be a glaring exception to that general rule.
Hoxby quickly gathered data, and just a month after the AFT study grabbed headlines, her study, A Straightforward Comparison of Charter
Schools and Regular Public Schools in the United States, is making news with findings showing that, on average, students in charter schools are 5 percent more likely to be proficient in reading and 3 percent more likely to be proficient in math than students at the closest public schools with similar racial compo
Schools and
Regular Public
Schools in the United States, is making news with findings showing that, on average, students in charter schools are 5 percent more likely to be proficient in reading and 3 percent more likely to be proficient in math than students at the closest public schools with similar racial compo
Schools in the United States, is making news with findings showing that, on
average, students in charter
schools are 5 percent more likely to be proficient in reading and 3 percent more likely to be proficient in math than students at the closest public schools with similar racial compo
schools are 5 percent more likely to be proficient in reading and 3 percent more likely to be proficient in math
than students at the closest public
schools with similar racial compo
schools with similar racial composition.
All 21 graduating seniors at SEED this year went on to four - year
schools, and its
average SAT score was significantly higher
than neighboring
regular schools.
Denouncing charter
schools for having lower -
than -
average test scores is like denouncing drug rehab clinics for having more drug users
than regular hospitals.
Despite receiving millions in additional funds from CPS and private entities that
regular public
schools do not get access to, AUSL «results» are little better
than — and in some cases lag behind — district
averages.
The authors pointed out some of the advantages of low poverty noting, «Children whose parents read to them at home, whose health is good and can attend
school regularly, who do not live in fear of crime and violence, who enjoy stable housing and continuous
school attendance, whose parents»
regular employment creates security, who are exposed to museums, libraries, music and art lessons, who travel outside their immediate neighborhoods, and who are surrounded by adults who model high educational achievement and attainment will, on
average, achieve at higher levels
than children without these educationally relevant advantages.»
To incorporate a project such as this into a «
regular» classroom, a
school would have to give the instructor more academic freedom
than the
average classroom teacher usually has.
Academies may not, on
average, be better
than regular schools, but the best ones are doing astonishing things.
A study released last week by the Illinois Policy Institute, which has offices in Springfield and Chicago, and the Lexington Institute, a think tank based in Arlington, Va., shows that both Hispanic students and English - language learners in UNO
schools score better on state reading and math tests on
average than do those same groups in
regular Chicago
schools.