If the atmosphere is warmer than the liquid, on
average the energy transferred to the liquid by water molecules being absorbed will excede the energy transfer to the atmosphere by evaporation.
Not exact matches
While many basic aspects of physics can be included (conservation of mass,
energy etc.), many need to be approximated for reasons of efficiency or resolutions (i.e. the equations of motion need estimates of sub-gridscale turbulent effects, radiative
transfer codes approximate the line - by - line calculations using band
averaging), and still others are only known empirically (the formula for how fast clouds turn to rain for instance).
The processes (absorption of light, collisional
energy transfer and emission) can be separated because the
average time that an isolated CO2 molecule takes before it emits a photon is much longer that the time for collisional de-excitation (~ tens of microseconds at atmospheric pressure, less, higher in the atmosphere).
Do these molecules cool down —
transfer energy to cooler oxygen and nitrogen molecules — and then absorb photons to complete the
average warming of the atmosphere?
Temp will peak when the net
energy transfer goes below
average and not when the solar input goes below
average.
The
average position of the ITCZ is situated north of the equator because most ocean is in the southern hemisphere and it is ocean temperatures that dictate its position by governing the rate of
energy transfer from oceans to air.
If the
average radiant layer were 288K @ 390Wm - 2 and you didn't have to consider other non-radiant means of
energy transfer, that would be a fair estimate.
The net heat flows are much smaller like 60 W / m ^ 2 which is a typical estimate for the
average net
energy transfer from Earth surface due to LWIR taking both emission and absorption into account.
I also claim that because the atmosphere is on
average colder than the surface, more
energy is
transferred from the surface to the atmosphere compared with the reverse situation.
Other than redistribution or
averaging velocity of molecules, air only
transfers energy thru air via convection.
Since the infrared - inactive gases don't emit infrared light, if enough absorbed
energy is
transferred to the nitrogen and oxygen molecules through collisions, that could theoretically increase the
average energy of the air molecules, i.e., it could «heat up» the air.
Since the
average land temperature is lower and dryer than the SST, warming and cooling anomalies are larger for a given amount of
energy transfer from the oceans, latent and sensible.
To be
energy or more properly, heat
transferred, the one - way upwelling radiation from the surface absorbed by the air should be reduced by subtraction of the down - welling radiation of the air absorbed by the surface Note that by subtraction of the (about 20 W / m ² in global
average) flow surface to cosmos of both terms of GH, GH expression becomes GH = (radiation from the surface absorbed by the air) minus (outgoing longwave radiation from the air) which has absolutely no physical sense!
Due to this loss of
energy, the temperature of the remain water has dropped (1 / heat capacity = 0.24 degK / (kJ / kg)-RRB- OR the lost
energy must be imported by: conduction (collisions
transferring kinetic
energy), convection (a new group of molecules with a new
average energy), or absorbing radiation.
On the
average, the evaporation
transfers about 45 kJ / mol of
energy from the liquid phase to the gas phase at 20 degC (and 40.65 kJ / mol at 100 degC).
You can have a long period of cold air at the surface with little turbulent mixing and little
energy transfer, followed by a short period of a warm surface and lots of turbulence and
energy transfer - ending with a time
average of warm over cold, but a time
average of upward
energy transfer.
Although it is a reasonable simplification to think of the
transfer of thermal
energy in a conduction - like model - where flux is related to the temperature gradient using a turbulent
transfer coefficient - it is quite possible to have time -
averaged flux moving in the opposite direction to time -
averaged temperature gradient.
# 5) On the
average the atmosphere is homogeneous and any component of
energy transfer (components of a vector) horizontally is totally cancelable and can be reasonably considered zero at the local macro level.
Of course, if you
average enough collisions, the net flow of
energy is from the warm to the cold block, but individual collisions can
transfer energy either way.
This is not a violation of the 2nd law, because there is, on
average, a NET
transfer of
energy from the warm metal to the cooler water.
While A is
transferring energy to B, B is
transferring a similar amount of
energy to A. Ie the NET
transfer of
energy is zero (at least when
averaged over sufficiently long periods of time to
average out short - term statistical fluctuations).
Rather than rely on miners to verify transactions, any
average user running a Raspberry Pi can now be able to open a channel and enable
transfer of funds for a fraction of the previous cost while also consuming little
energy.