This method yields
an average warming estimate of just 1.5 - 2 degrees C for doubling CO2.
Not exact matches
With Arctic temperatures
warming twice as fast as the global
average, scientists
estimate thawing permafrost could release large amounts of carbon into the atmosphere through the end of the century with significant climate impacts.
«The sub-surface
warming revealed in this research is on
average twice as large as previously
estimated with almost all of coastal Antarctica affected.
The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) has
estimated that the
average global
warming in this century will rise by 4 °C in a business - as - usual scenario.
The U.S. National Research Council (NRC)
estimates that every degree Celsius of
warming in global
average temperatures means a 5 to 15 percent drop in yield, particularly for corn, in North America.
Global mean temperature for the period January to September 2017 was 0.47 ° ± 0.08 °C
warmer than the 1981 - 2010
average (
estimated at 14.31 °C).
We assess the heat content change from both of the long time series (0 to 700 m layer and the 1961 to 2003 period) to be 8.11 ± 0.74 × 1022 J, corresponding to an
average warming of 0.1 °C or 0.14 ± 0.04 W m — 2, and conclude that the available heat content
estimates from 1961 to 2003 show a significant increasing trend in ocean heat content.
If we continue we'll soon get close to 560 [double the carbon dioxide concentration preceding the industrial revolution] or 2.3 (our
estimate) to 3 (I.P.C.C.) degrees C. (4.1 - 5.4 degrees F.) global
average surface air
warming.
«We use a massive ensemble of the Bern2.5 D climate model of intermediate complexity, driven by bottom - up
estimates of historic radiative forcing F, and constrained by a set of observations of the surface
warming T since 1850 and heat uptake Q since the 1950s... Between 1850 and 2010, the climate system accumulated a total net forcing energy of 140 x 1022 J with a 5 - 95 % uncertainty range of 95 - 197 x 1022 J, corresponding to an
average net radiative forcing of roughly 0.54 (0.36 - 0.76) Wm - 2.»
Second, since
warming estimates vary as a function of the GMST data products chosen (Table 2), we propose to
estimate trends on the annual
averages of all five data products.
Item 8 could be confusing in having so many messages: «It is extremely likely that more than half of the observed increase in global
average surface temperature from 1951 to 2010 was caused by the anthropogenic increase in greenhouse gas... The best
estimate of the human - induced contribution to
warming is similar to the observed
warming over this period....
The actual prevailing view of the paleoclimate research community that emerged during the early 1990s, when long - term proxy data became more widely available and it was possible to synthesize them into
estimates of large - scale temperature changes in past centuries, was that the
average temperature over the Northern Hemisphere varied by significantly less than 1 degree C in previous centuries (i.e., the variations in past centuries were small compared to the observed 20th century
warming).
If we continue we'll soon get close to 560 [double the carbon dioxide concentration preceding the industrial revolution] or 2.3 (our
estimate) to 3 (I.P.C.C.) degrees C. (4.1 - 5.4 degrees F.) global
average surface air
warming.
But aren't these way too low, since LOTI shows we are — as of 2017 — already around 0.95 C
warmer than the 1951 - 1980
average, and there is more
warming «in the pipeline» because of the time lag, and another (
estimated) 0.5 C
warming when the anthropogenic aerosols dimming effect is removed?
«Relative to
average temperature for 1880 - 1920, which we take as an appropriate
estimate of «pre-industrial» temperature, 2016 was +1.26 °C (~ 2.3 °F)
warmer than in the base period.»
Early 20th century
warming was around.4 oC in three decades The global
average temperature experienced an increase of +0.57 C between 1910 and 1944: http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh+sh/annual Early 20th century was also about half anthropogenic I'm very curious about where you get this
estimate from.
Additionally the oceanic
warming and cooling cycles introduce constant, rapid and substantial changes not yet reflected in any models and which invalidate any
averaged global
estimates of the planetary heat budget.
Each SCC
estimate is the
average of numerous iterations (10,000 in the EPA's assessment, which we reproduce here) of the model using different potential values for climate sensitivity (how much
warming a doubling of CO2 will generate).
Using the IPCC climate sensitivity of 3.2 C, the CO2 level by 2100 would need to double by 2100, from today's 392 to 784 ppmv, to reach this
warming (the high side IPCC «scenario and storyline» A2 is at this level, with
estimated warming of 3.4 C above the 1980 - 1999
average, or ~ 3.2 C above today's temperature).
We assess the heat content change from both of the long time series (0 to 700 m layer and the 1961 to 2003 period) to be 8.11 ± 0.74 × 1022 J, corresponding to an
average warming of 0.1 °C or 0.14 ± 0.04 W m — 2, and conclude that the available heat content
estimates from 1961 to 2003 show a significant increasing trend in ocean heat content.
The Arctic has been
warming at more than twice the rate of the globe as a whole, with
average temperatures today 5.4 °F (3 °C) above what they were at the beginning of the 20th century, compared to an
estimated global
average of 1.8 °F (1 °C) over the same time.
Mosher, why on your poster with Zeke, do the different methodologies for
estimating the
average temperature of the CUS give the same history, and yet the regional levels of
warming and cooling are quite different?
Summing up: My question for sTeve is: why would you choose the GISS
estimate of temperatures, which shows parts of the past decade as higher than 1998 and considerable
average warming, over the other three monitoring agencies, which show much less or no
warming for the decade?
The
warmest year ever recorded was 2010, with a temperature
estimated at 0.54 °C above the 14.0 °C long term
average of the 1961 - 1990 base period, followed closely by 2005.
One study
estimates that there are likely to be places on Earth where unprotected humans without cooling mechanisms, such as air conditioning, would die in less than six hours if global
average surface temperature rises by about 12.6 ° F (7 ° C).16 With
warming of 19.8 - 21.6 ° F (11 - 12 ° C), this same study projects that regions where approximately half of the world's people now live could become intolerable.7
«We use a massive ensemble of the Bern2.5 D climate model of intermediate complexity, driven by bottom - up
estimates of historic radiative forcing F, and constrained by a set of observations of the surface
warming T since 1850 and heat uptake Q since the 1950s... Between 1850 and 2010, the climate system accumulated a total net forcing energy of 140 x 1022 J with a 5 - 95 % uncertainty range of 95 - 197 x 1022 J, corresponding to an
average net radiative forcing of roughly 0.54 (0.36 - 0.76) Wm - 2.»
For that reason, Victor expresses sympathy for the IPCC's goal of producing
average estimates of global
warming's effects.
How much cooling would you
estimate occurred in the sites that exhibited a cooling trend, if the
average of all sites is +.65 C and the 2/3 of sites that showed a
warming trend were on
average between +1 - 2C?
The
average range of
estimates is 2 to 4 C
warmer than some time in the past.
The Earth's
average surface temperature is
estimated to have
warmed 1.3 degrees Fahrenheit (0.7 degrees Celsius) since humans accelerated greenhouse gas emissions around the time of the Industrial Revolution.
• Poles to tropics temperature gradient,
average temp of tropics over past 540 Ma; and arguably
warming may be net - beneficial overall • Quotes from IPCC AR4 WG1 showing that
warming would be beneficial for life, not damaging • Quotes from IPCC AR5 WG3 stating (in effect) that the damage functions used for
estimating damages are not supported by evidence • Richard Tol's breakdown of economic impacts of GW by sector • Economic damages of climate change — about the IAMs • McKitrick — Social Cost of Carbon much lower than commonly stated • Bias on impacts of GHG emissions — Figure 1 is a chart showing 15 recent
estimates of SCC — Lewis and Curry, 2015, has the lowest uncertainty range.
This point was also made by Schmidt et al. (2014), which additionally showed that incorporating the most recent
estimates of aerosol, solar, and greenhouse gas forcings, as well as the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) and temperature measurement biases, the discrepancy between
average GCM global surface
warming projections and observations is significantly reduced.
Their
estimate that the temperature has been
warmer than today 28 % of the time is interesting (today refers to 2000 - 2009
average).
As a central
estimate, the
average spring
warming trend of the four datasets shown in Table 3 for WAIS since 1979 is 0.54 °C / decade.
The available evidence indicates that, on the contrary,
warming in this region has been slower than
average, pointing to the bias due to sparse observations over it being in the opposite direction to that
estimated from model simulations.
iii) Over the last 3 decades, every individual station north of 70o indicates
warming, 13 of 17 are significant at 95 % confidence, all
estimated trend rates are faster than the global
average, some are more than five times as fast.
Somewhat related, Snyder
estimates the global
average temperature during the previous interglacial (Eemian) to be
warmer than now, whereas e.g. Hansen et al (2016, under review) argue that they are similarly
warm.
Relative to
average temperature for 1880 - 1920, which we take as an appropriate
estimate of «pre-industrial» temperature, 2017 was +1.17 °C (~ 2.1 °F)
warmer than in the 1880 - 1920 base period.
Provisional
estimates of
average global temperatures based on monthly climatological land - station and sea - surface temperature records have suggested it could be the
warmest year on record.
In terms of the
average surface temperature of Earth, these indirect
estimates show that 1983 to 2012 was probably the
warmest 30 - year period in more than 800 years.
The World Meteorological Organization (WMO) released its provisional Statement on the State of the Climate this week,
estimating that 2017 is likely to be one of the
warmest years for global
average surface temperature, with many high - impact events including catastrophic hurricanes, floods, heatwaves and droughts.
Professor Phil Jones at the University of East Anglia (yes, the Phil Jones), tells me: «The error of
estimate of global
averages or the forecasts for subsequent years is completely unrelated to the trend of
warming.
Climate models
estimate that around the world,
average VPD in
warm seasons could rise as much as 3.6 percent each decade, according to the study.
Taken together, the
average of the
warmest times during the middle Pliocene presents a view of the equilibrium state of a globally
warmer world, in which atmospheric CO2 concentrations (
estimated to be between 360 to 400 ppm) were likely higher than pre-industrial values (Raymo and Rau, 1992; Raymo et al., 1996), and in which geologic evidence and isotopes agree that sea level was at least 15 to 25 m above modern levels (Dowsett and Cronin, 1990; Shackleton et al., 1995), with correspondingly reduced ice sheets and lower continental aridity (Guo et al., 2004).
Taking an
average across ESMs suggests that our cumulative emissions to date would correspond to about 0.3 C more than best
estimates of human - caused
warming so far.
One of its most striking findings is its conclusion that the upper range of
warming over the next 100 years could be even higher than it
estimated in 1995, in a worst case raising the
average global temperature 11 degrees Fahrenheit from where it was in 1990.
A comparison of 18 different
estimates of Australian annual
average temperatures for 1911 to 2013 shows the same overall
warming trend.
Climate researcher Ken Stewart looked closer and found the
averaged mean ACORN maximum on 21 December 1972 was 35.91 C, somewhat
warmer than the raw
average max of 35.1 C at 721 stations on 7 January 2013 but nevertheless a lot cooler than the 40.17 C
estimated by the BoM's AWAP national daily procedure.
If it takes over 100 - 200 years, as some
estimate, to turn over the ocean the
warming of the sea surface will continue to
warm the deep ocean for decades even if the sea surface temp falls as long as the surface temp remains above the moving
average temp for whatever the ocean turnover rate is.
Ira Glickstein stated that the
warming due to CO2 would only be about 0.2 C. Here's a way to get a rough
estimate of the figure: We get an
average of 342 watts / M ^ 2 from the sun.