Sentences with phrase «averaged over the globe»

Forcings, measured in W / m2 averaged over the globe, are imposed perturbations of Earth's energy balance caused by changing forcing agents such as solar irradiance and human - made greenhouse gases (GHGs).

Preliminary calculations * show that surface temperatures ** averaged over the globe in 2004 were the fourth highest (and the past decade was the warmest) since measurements began in 1861.

Averaged over the globe and over long time periods, this balance must be zero.

The zero temperature trend differences averaged over the globe for the 50 years, that have been purported to be those must influenced by any potential anthropogenic influences, becomes another simplifying result that can be used to claim that the «average» UHI effect over those critical years was zero.

That works fine if the errors behave like measurement errors, because measurement errors are independent - if you average them over the globe they tend to cancel out, and the global mean thus has a lower uncertainty than an individual measurement.

To compute the effect of the interaction of changing seasonal insolation and albedo, he uses albedo data from NASA's Terra satelite, finding a total of 3.674 x 10 ^ 24 Joules of solar energy absorbed over the Gaussian year (equivalent to 228.25 W / m ^ 2 averaged over the globe.

y ^ M is the average over the globe for y. INT means integral.

What we — and other competent researchers — have all found is that the warmth was far more regional than modern warmth, with some large regions, like the tropical Pacific, having been unusually * cold * at the time, and when you average over the globe, the warmth of the medieval warm period / medieval climate anomaly simply doesn't reach modern warmth.

Enough time to overcome signal: noise difficulties and represent global climate data, as opposed merely weather - scale events averaged over the globe.

Averaged over the globe, this albedo decrease corresponds to a forcing that is 25 % as large as that due to the change in CO2 during this period, considerably larger than expectations from models and other less direct recent estimates.

Namely: If the Incident flux at the earth is 1366W / m ^ 2, that number averaged over the globe becomes 341.5 W / m ^ 2.

Not exact matches

There have been over 18,000 Muslim terrorist attacks since 9/11, on average 2 o3 a day around the globe.

«This becomes even more critical when predicting climate change over a specific region like Alaska instead of the whole globe averaged together.»

Averaged over the entire globe, it's one - fourth as large as the heating caused by increasing atmospheric CO2 concentrations during the same period.

However, make no mistake, the globe's average temperature has still risen over that period (including record heat in 2014) and temperatures now are the hottest they've been since recordkeeping began in the 1880s.

Temperature changes relative to the corresponding average for 1901 - 1950 (°C) from decade to decade from 1906 to 2005 over the Earth's continents, as well as the entire globe, global land area and the global ocean (lower graphs).

global warming The increase in Earth's surface air temperatures, on average, across the globe and over decades.

However, make no mistake, the globe's average temperature has still risen over that period (including

Trenberth replied promptly (the guy is a class act), informing me that von Schuckmann's energy imbalance of 0.77 W / m2 was for the ocean only and when you average it out over the whole globe, it gives a net energy imbalance of 0.54 W / m2.

The globe - hopping dividend fund has a four - star rating from Morningstar and has outpaced 95 % of its peers over the past five years, with an average annual return of 8.33 %.

MCLEAN, Va., May 03, 2018 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE)-- Freddie Mac (OTCQB: FMCC) today released the results of its Primary Mortgage Market Survey ® (PMMS ®), showing that after steadily rising in most of April, average mortgage rates dipped slightly over the past week.

As each station was selected (from random mouse - clicks all over the globe), I updated my global - average computations with that station's data.

An average over just part of the globe is not.

Now draw a picture of the globe and show on it what you call «average temperatures» for whatever zones you choose to draw on it; then show recent variations from those «averages» — the variations from the longterm average in a higher latitude zone don't mean as much, because we're comparing today's measurement to averages based on fewer numbers, collected over fewer years in fewer places, when looking at variation near the Poles.

The HadCRUT4 dataset, compiled from many thousands of temperature measurements taken across the globe, from all continents and all oceans, is used to estimate global temperature, shows that 2017 was 0.99 ± 0.1 °C above pre-industrial levels, taken as the average over the period 1850 - 1900, and 0.38 ± 0.1 °C above the 1981 - 2010 average.

The average you quoted which is spread over the whole globe and is for 24 hours [ie 12 hours of no sunshine].

HadCRUT4 measures the average temperature over most of the globe, but not all of it.

Global warming would of course mean — averaged over the whole globe.

Because of the shorter period of the CERES EBAF product, the areal averaged Gsa [surface greenhouse effect] is represented only between 2003 and 2014 in Fig. 2 but shows no notable trend over the globe, sea or land.

It's a problem for your argument when you try to convince people that sparse or non-existent temperature over most of the globe is sufficient to establish a global average temperature trend accurate to tenth's of a degree per decade.

Temperatures that average 1 - 2 degrees F above normal over the globe can still support snow in many places.

Consequently, the three Australian scientists conclude that «although there may be evidence of regional increasing trends in flood hazard, the hypothesis that there is a significant increase in flood hazard when averaged over all the data - covered regions of the globe is not supported by this analysis.»

The Arctic has been warming at more than twice the rate of the globe as a whole, with average temperatures today 5.4 °F (3 °C) above what they were at the beginning of the 20th century, compared to an estimated global average of 1.8 °F (1 °C) over the same time.

For the planet's sea level, this would mean over a half - foot rise averaged around the globe, in comparison with average sea levels from 1986 to 2005.

Then I calculated the trend in the adjustment averaged over the stations in each grid cell on the globe, to determine whether the adjustments were increasing or decreasing the temperature trend.

Trenberth replied promptly (the guy is a class act), informing me that von Schuckmann's energy imbalance of 0.77 W / m2 was for the ocean only and when you average it out over the whole globe, it gives a net energy imbalance of 0.54 W / m2.

Prior to 1979 when satellites began to measure lower troposphere temperature all over the globe we had no measure of global average temperature (GAT) only guesstimates based on fewer and fewer measurements using instruments not designed to measure decadal trends so small as a few milliKelvins per decade.

For the time period from 1979 to 1998, it is estimated that on average, over the globe, surface temperature has increased by 0.25 to 0.4 °C and lower to mid-tropospheric temperature has increased by 0.0 to 0.2 °C.9 break

To compare this with AGW, AR5 Table AII.2 yields an annual average year - round and global forcing increase averaged over the last 30 years of +0.026 Wm ^ -2 / year, many times higher than the part - year, part - globe CSI which is also a small part of the insolation changes over the last 1,000 years, an effect which is adjudged, with or without any omission, to be insignificant in comparison to AGW.

My conclusion is that a careful observation of weather patterns over the entire globe and, in particular, ascertaining whether there is a net average surface movement of air towards the poles or towards the equator should reveal whether there is an overall global warming or cooling trend at any particular time.

While the last 15 years have not warmed as quickly, we've seen steady warming over most of the globe, and we haven't seen a below - average temperature month since February 1985.

However, they assert that «when weather is averaged over space and time, the fact that the globe is warming emerges clearly...»

Clearly, climate is an average over the whole globe (land / sea / air), with the minimum timescale being a decade.

Then in any month, you average over a region (globe, NH etc) the anomalies in your current dataset.

One can expect a lot of noise in annual average temperatures over a small segment of the globe.

The average precipitation over the globe is about 1 m annually, so there must be a rapid turnover of water in the air; the average water molecule spends about 9 days in the air before precipitating back to the surface.

They began with a one - dimensional vertical slice of atmosphere, averaged over a zone of latitude or over the entire globe.

Instead it's a slow background increase in temperatures, averaged out over the whole globe.

When we say the «global» average increases you need to understand that we mean the average over all the globe.

How the United Nations or anyone can say the average human being is harming the environment with a straight face while the government is already engaged in wide scale geoengineering projects based on bunk data that have untold detrimental short - and long - term impact around the entire globe on the environment and its flora and fauna — carrying out projects that have never been approved through any democratic process whatsoever and which we are still not officially being told is happening even as it goes on over our heads — is despicable.