Not exact matches
Finally, and to reiterate an earlier point, the way forward for this club is to stop paying below
average bench players so much money and to focus the bulk of the weekly wages on establishing a dominant starting 11... this will require the club to eat some wages in order to ship some players out, get rid of any deadwood
over the age of 21, develop a cutting edge scouting service and put your money where your mouth is for once... I would much
rather have a starting 11 that was world - class and give some reasonably paid young blue - chippers playing
time when injuries occur than have 2 or 3 world class players surrounded by a plethora of overpaid and underwhelming players... management would no longer be able to sell their half - baked plans to the fans under the guise of «winning now», which any intelligent fan knows is a crap - shoot at best, and instead create a a squad that provides hope for the present and the future... this is exactly the model that has been used by Barcelona, Real & Bayern, so it should be good enough for us... by the way, until Messi & Ronaldo re-signed just recently all 3 clubs weekly wages were on par with ours... think about that for a second or two
This is not a problem that started today but
rather has been around for the last decade.To start with, everyone knew we would fall short at the secound half of the season for lack of enough depth in quality and the outcome now isn't surprising to most pple especially our rivals... wenger himself said we had enough quality to challenge in all front and even went further to say there were no players out there who cld improve us.i have said many
times that half of this squad is
average and can not achieve much.with klopp, mou, conte / simeone and pep around nxt season then lets see how this blemish «Angel» of our is gonna fair out.Nxt season will even get worse.for arsenal the phrase is «IT»S DEJA VU ALL
OVER AGAIN»!!!
But
rather than just
average all of the data out, they watched how it changed
over time.
However, I strongly suppose that the
time frame is
rather small, and so I would advise that you either invest the money immediately, or dollar - cost
average your investment
over the course of the year.
I'd
rather spread the risk out
over time - i.e. typical reasons for dollar cost
averaging).
By making changes
over time, they capture the market
average rather than take the risk of hitting a peak or valley.
Rather, the goal is to outperform on
average, most of the
time and
over the long run.
Dollar cost
averaging describes a way of investing in which a person buys a stock or other asset in a series of small purchases
over time rather than in one large purchase.
This doesn't seem right to me because
rather than take advantage of dollar - cost
averaging and spreading the deposits out
over time, the deposit is at the mercy of whatever the market is doing that particular day.
Definitely no dollar cost
averaging for $ 100K (unless you're going dollar - cost
average 25K
over maybe a month... but then that's not much of an
average) You're better off dumping the lump in and getting the value of
time rather than whatever small percentage you'll gain from buying at a lower price.
Editorially, Kiplinger's magazine has championed
over the decades a number of personal finance strategies and investment products that later became popular «conventional wisdom»: the superiority of systematic investing (dollar cost
averaging)
over market
timing; growth stocks that paid little or no dividends but invested in new technologies; mutual funds, especially no - load funds; stock index funds; term life insurance,
rather than whole - life; and global investing.
But
rather than avoid the US, or agonise
over the
timing of a potential buy, I think it presents the ideal opportunity to slowly but surely
average into high quality US growth stocks which have already (and / or perhaps will still) suffer a temporary share price / valuation setback.
Thus I say it is better to be disciplined, and buy and hold a volatile investment with low fees
over time,
rather than own an indexed annuity that will tend to lock you in, and deliver lower returns on
average.
I like to add to my equity holdings
over time using a dollar cost
averaging strategy, so
rather than stop investing I added to my position each month in the Vanguard High Dividend Yield ETF (VYM).
Having had this breed for
over 30 years in a busy household with children and having had an
average of 5 Chi's at a
time, ours have loved being around the kids and have viewed all visitors as new friends
rather than potential enemies.Still informative and enjoyed authors experiences of this delightful breed.
This statement is true for each day,
rather than for an
average over time.
The reality will be
rather different If we continue to emit ever - greater quantities of CO2 and other greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, then
average global temperatures will rise by 2 °C
over the next three decades compared to pre-industrial
times.
This is definitely on par with other flagships and,
over the past few days, the battery has held up
rather well with an
average of 4 to 5 hours of screen on
time.
While we could share the fact that our clients earn 11
times the national
average, we'd
rather introduce you to clients who are experiencing success in their businesses, like Ben Andrews of Portland, Ore., who went from having $ 300 in the bank and a baby on the way to closing
over 50 transactions and $ 22.7 million in sales volume.