Sentences with phrase «aversive techniques»

Veterinary researchers have found that aggressive dogs who are trained using aversive techniques do not improve, in fact most of them get even more aggressive!

Any use of aversive techniques such as spraying your cat with water or getting cross and stalking it around the house is only going to make things worse and may cause further problems, so seek help from your vet as soon as possible.

Aversive techniques on the other hand involve applying punishment such as hitting, yelling, pinning down, jerking on a leash and the use of electric shocks to deter the dog from repeating undesirable behaviour.

They also found that these dogs were a lot more likely to respond aggressively to new situations than dogs who were not treated with aversive techniques.

While our focus is on positive reinforcement dog training techniques, we also believe that a comprehensive education is vital to your animal career, which means that we include an education on aversive techniques as well.

Sadly, research has shown that while aversive techniques may work, these do not inherently teach dogs what an acceptable behavior really means.

They ruin the human - dog bond: Aversive techniques put your relationship with your dog at risk.

Old school dog trainers often invoke aversive techniques to punish a dog that is reacting out of fear, such as using shock collars on dog - reactive dogs.

Examples include use of aversive techniques (e.g. leash corrections, spray bottles, loud noises) and / or equipment (e.g. aversive collars) to reduce undesirable behavior.

Using aversive techniques is not only unnecessary, there are also multiple negative side effects associated with their use, including apathy, learned helplessness, generalized fear or anxiety, escape / avoidance behaviors, and increased aggression.

This positive method teaches the dog two things: «If I work I get something» and» My owner brings good things and I trust him» rather than fearing him and associating him with aversive techniques.

Whether it's hitting, tapping, or bopping a dog on the nose as means of discipline, this aversive technique still falls short of the success found with using reward - based or positive training.

You can bet that they use aversive techniques (we just aren't told about it).

I bet that the trainers at animal parks and zoos have to sign confidentiality agreements to prevent telling the public how often they are injured, or when they have had to use aversive techniques to deal with dangerous wild animals.

At no time will we use aversive techniques (harsh physical or verbal corrections, prong, choke, or shock collars, etc.) nor will we permit our students to use such punishments.

Some aversive techniques work well, especially when they are coupled with positive reinforcements.

The review showed an increase in fear and aggression associated with the use of aversive techniques.

Some people still hold to the view that aversive techniques are more effective.

For example, use of a shock collar, hitting the dog, pinning the dog, using a choke or prong collar, bark collars, and sharp tugs on the leash («leash corrections») are all aversive techniques.

«We promote the use of reward - based training methods, thereby minimizing the use of aversive techniques.»

However, these aversive techniques should be used to interrupt the dog's action, not as punishment - and they work best when you successfully conceal the fact you are causing the noise.

Without the use of complicated or aversive techniques and equipment, our employee safety program teaches sustainable ways to discourage dogs from developing fearful or aggressive responses to household visitors

Aversive techniques (e. g., punishment and «get tough» approaches) should be avoided to the extent possible (Guetzloe, 1989, 1991).

In contrast to traditional approaches of behaviour modification that used aversive techniques to limit problem behaviours, PBS focuses on building socially appropriate skills and supporting individuals» use of «positive» behaviours (Durand and Carr 1985; Meyer and Evans 1989).