Aversive training is a method in which negative consequences are used to discourage certain behaviors in animals or people. It involves punishment or discomfort to prevent or stop unwanted actions, with the goal of teaching desired behaviors.
Full definition
Plus, there's no risk of the negative fallout commonly associated with correction - based training (please read My Crossover Story for Jill's first - hand experience illustrating the dangers of using
aversive training techniques).
Recent research has shown that the use
of aversive training methods can increase aggressive behavior from dogs.
I took him to puppy school and then obedience classes and have only ever used positive reinforcement training with him - I don't agree
with aversive training methods and have seen dogs become very aggressive because of it.
Project Trade is PPG's advocacy program whereby members offer service discounts in exchange
for aversive training gear.
It is not our intention to credit or discredit dog trainers who use
more aversive training techniques than those emphasized in the Dog Trainer Program.
Puppies often respond best to reward - based training or positive reinforcement, although
sometimes aversive training techniques can be used depending on the situation.
Examples of
aversive training include using products such as «Bitter Apple Spray» to discourage teething behavior on incorrect objects.
Julie Shaw used and
taught aversive training methods for five years until one day she put down the choke collar and stopped training entirely.
While the
older aversive training methods focused in having a dog obey to «avoid pain or discomfort» today, the dog is encouraged to «operate» for rewards.
For a full list of
why aversive training is bad, please visit Danger Of Using Fear and Pain Based Training Approaches
(This section is provided to help crossover trainers understand how different positive reinforcement clicker training is
from aversive training.
Couple aversive training with associative learning, and the dog now learns that something in his environment that he found pleasant is now stressful and to be feared.
Aversive training seems to work fast; the problem is that you often train an association quite different from the one you intended!
Any PHD and behavioral will agree you can change behavior
with aversive training but what's left in its place?
Fortunately, scientists have started to shed some light on the effectiveness and humaneness of popular training approaches, in particular, how dogs trained with reward - based methods differ from dogs trained using
aversive training techniques.
As knowledge of animal behavior is strengthened through scientific research, the findings reveal that
using aversive training methods when working with fearful or aggressive dogs can actually lead to worse behaviors.
I think that
aversive training should be banned.
It's a shame that some dog trainers still use
aversive training and make a lot of money doing it (for example the one who has his own show on tv, which unfortunately is a very popular show.)
As a force - free trainer that follows the science of training and must keep up to date on the latest studies, I do not utilize shock collars or
aversive training methods to «correct» the dog but instead utilize positive, force - free training that is backed by science on how canines learn.
1)
Aversive training with dog whistles can be very effective during obedience training, as it provides a Pavlovian cue for a dog to stop doing something that is not desired by the trainer or owner.
Heather:
Aversive training methods that use fear or physical punishment do more harm than good.
It does not teach your dog what they should DO: Trainers and people who use
aversive training, focus so much time on stopping behaviors that they forget to focus on training the dog what they should do or how they should react to particular stimuli.
Basic obedience training plays a vital role in preventing behavioral problems, however, if you choose to use
aversive training methods, it may backfire.
What we don't want to do is to use
an aversive training method.
It is not only pet owners who need to shift their perceptions; in many cases it is the pet industry that is lagging behind and continuing to rely on misleading reports and marketing studies, often conducted by the same companies that manufacture
the aversive training equipment.
learn using positive reinforcement methods far more efficiently than
aversive training methods.
«it appears that
aversive training methods have undesirable unintended outcomes and that using them puts dogs» welfare at risk»
Veterinary behaviorist Dr. Theresa DePorter agrees and adds, «Not only is there a welfare issue with
aversive training, you're not communicating what you do want to your dog to do.»
A new study released in the Journal of Veterinary Behavior reveals what many of us in the dog behavior field have long known to be true: that positive reinforcement training is beneficial for a dog's overall well - being and the canine - human bond, and that
aversive training has detrimental effects on both.
Learn from the experts in dog behaviour why fear, dominance or
aversive training is not the best method to use when working with your dog.
Pit Bulls do not need a heavy hand, prong collar, or
aversive training to learn.
Aversive training techniques, which have been seen to be used by Cesar Millan (The Dog Whisperer) are based on the principle of applying an unpleasant stimulus to inhibit behaviour.
Although many studies have already been done on the damaging effects of
aversive training methods, the scope of the study was uniquely different.
Phrases with «aversive training»