Truly only one negative feedback in the planet's overall carbon cycle can act with sufficient speed and strength to
avert catastrophic climate impacts: The dominant carbon - based life form on this planet will have to respond to the already painfully clear impacts of our carbon emissions by slashing those emissions sharply and eventually running the planet on carbon - negative power.
Of course this is totally dependent on how «better» is measured, but there is one fundamental, over-riding sense in which I think it isn't better - that we are likely facing potentially
catastrophic impacts from anthropogenic
climate change and we have little prospect of
averting that within timescales that would make a significant difference.
Written by thousands of science, policy, and economics experts from around the world, the UN International Panel on
Climate Change (IPCC) reports represent a synthesis of existing climate research knowledge, focusing on the evidence of a warming climate («virtually certain»), the global impacts, and the ways we might avert its most catastrophic e
Climate Change (IPCC) reports represent a synthesis of existing
climate research knowledge, focusing on the evidence of a warming climate («virtually certain»), the global impacts, and the ways we might avert its most catastrophic e
climate research knowledge, focusing on the evidence of a warming
climate («virtually certain»), the global impacts, and the ways we might avert its most catastrophic e
climate («virtually certain»), the global
impacts, and the ways we might
avert its most
catastrophic effects.