John Lipscomb, for example, of the University of Minnesota, Twin Cities, says it's important that candidates
avoid presenting teaching «as a second priority.»
Not exact matches
How then do we
present the Church's
teaching to the modern world in its orthodox meaning, yet without introducing any sense of arbitrariness or incoherence into God's works, which is what the thinkers named above were all rightly keen to
avoid?
We knew what
teachings we wanted to
avoid, but were flummoxed about what to
present as an alternative.
I would add that perhaps Paul's instructions that women should not
teach or have authority over men (which would be a turn - off to outsiders in that culture), can serve as a reminder that women actually should be allowed to
teach and have authority over men (in order to
avoid our own set of turn - offs in the
present culture.)
Sometimes, we
avoid those conversations that are needed and we focus more on the curriculum to be
taught, the assessments to be given and the accountability that is ever -
present.
Steven Saus
presents he Write Agenda Can
Teach You How To
Avoid Untrustworthy People... Like Themselves.