Sentences with phrase «avoid stating your opinion»

However, you should avoid stating your opinion as to cause or responsibility for the accident.

Not exact matches

You don't know it all, so avoid marking the start of your job by expounding your opinions on the state of your industry, the company you are in, or science in general... unless you're sure you know what you're talking about.

I certainly agree with you that you should be very careful about your choice of soy product as 90 % of the soybeans produced in the United States of America are genetically modified and should in my personal opinion be avoided.

If one judged public opinion by conventional public discourse, one would soon conclude that parents in the United States are neatly divided between devotees of district - operated schools and choiceniks determined to avoid them.

«It is crystal clear that the court here avoided the larger constitutional issue,» said Randi Weingarten, president of the American Federation of Teachers, who said the opinion «can not be read as opening the door for states to promote religion or expand vouchers.»

But, anyway, follow our main examples: use strong verbs and avoid modals to state your opinion.

The author's thesis is that linguistic analysis used in opinions to justify decisions is not done consistently and is often illogical because judges sometimes use linguistic analysis to avoid giving straightforward reasons for their decisions, lest they be criticized for wielding state power to act with partiality or for not following precedent.

Wernz noted that the Third Restatement is a source cited in some states» ethics opinions as authoritative, so Rule 5.5 (c)(4)'s protection might be far - reaching in terms of avoiding unauthorized practice.

By acknowledging competence of the Member States in the area of ISDS and by making this strong statements on how ISDS affects the powers of European judges, the Opinion clears the path for a Belgian or Slovenian request for an Opinion on the compatibility of ICS with the Treaties, something that the Commission has been keen to avoid in the past years.

In my opinion it is stated briefly and accurately in the following passage in the judgment of Aylesworth J.A., concurred in by Robertson C.J.O., in Woodward v. Harris, [1951] O.W.N. 221 at p. 223: «Authority is not required in support of the principle that a driver entering an intersection, even although he has the right of way, is bound to act so as to avoid a collision if reasonable care on his part will prevent it.

He Stated in one opinion: «I never like to entangle justice in matters of form, and to turn parties round on frivolous objections where I can avoid it.

1) we agree to disagree:) 2) supremacy of EU law for the EU system is the equivalent of the hard core of constitutional values that some national Courts defend against EU (and ECHR)- it is not a matter of «legitimacy» or «patriotism» but of using a «lower rank» instrument (accession treaty) to interfere with a treaty rule: the identical issue is for States who have a «rigid» constitution (alike the Treaty binds the CIEU): the accession treaty to ECHR or EU has a «lower rank» than the Constitution itself, so that the national Constitutional Court can not accept it can derogate to a higher ranking rule - usually they will find a way to reconcile the «construction» of the two set of rules, but if they are requested of an opinion on the point of principle, they will always say that in the very end, if all other paths have been explored to avoid the conflict, eventually it is the Constitution and neither ECHR nor EUwhich prevails.