Not exact matches
These children are also
described as less disruptive, less aggressive, and more mature than children with ambivalent or
avoidant attachment styles.
Based on the responses the researchers observed, Ainsworth
described three major
styles of
attachment: secure
attachment, ambivalent - insecure
attachment, and
avoidant - insecure
attachment.
The scientific story has developed from
attachment as care - giving and protective (or the opposite: deprivation, inadequacy, or insecure), to how
attachment may influence an individual's sense of themselves, their part in relationships, and their capacity to problem - solve and look after themselves —
attachment styles,
described as «inner working models» in the psychoanalytic literature which may persist into adult life (as secure, anxious,
avoidant, or disorganised).
Given what you
describe about your ex's behavior, it is possible that she terminated the relationship because of having an
avoidant attachment style, meaning that she is fearful about entering and becoming too close to others.1 People with
avoidant attachment styles are more likely than people with other
styles to end relationships when they start getting too intimate2 and to use indirect strategies to do so, such as avoiding direct communication about the real problems that are leading to the break - up.3 In other words, she may have been holding back negative feelings.
Bowlby
described three different
attachment styles based on the level of security in the
attachment bond: Secure, anxious / ambivalent, and
avoidant.
They develop anxious and
avoidant attachment styles and behave like pursuers and distances
described in ``
They develop anxious and
avoidant attachment styles and behave like pursuers and distances
described in «The Dance of Intimacy.»
In contrast, participants with an
avoidant - fearful
attachment style used more negative adjectives to
describe their parents.
The Scheffe post hoc test indicated that participants with an
avoidant - fearful
attachment style used more negative adjectives to
describe their mother (M = 3.61), compared to securely attached participants (M = 1.67).