Not exact matches
In this telling, valor is
awarded to those willing to make «hard»
decisions: these people support merit pay, firing bad teachers, holding schools accountable, and closing
failing schools.
Yesterday (July 16, 2015), after a seven day trial, Superior Court Judge Andrew P. Banks issued his
decision awarding the parents and children who wished to convert their
failing public school Palm Lane Elementary into a public charter school under the Parent Empowerment Act (also known as the Parent Trigger Law).
I am however prepared to make an
award of costs significantly higher than the tariff to send a strong message to the mother that her disregard for the rules of court and the meticulous timelines set out at the case management conferences and her unilateral
decision to
fail to appear at the March 1, 2013 Hearing are totally unacceptable.
«In an opinion released on May 13, 1997, this court sustained two of the plaintiff's assignments of error, finding: A review of the trial court's
decision demonstrates that the trial court
failed to address the fact that [the defendant] was
awarded a significant property settlement of approximately 1.2 million dollars.
Other
decisions that have reduced the wrongful dismissal damage
award because the dismissed employee
failed to properly mitigate his or her damages include Walsten v. Kinonjeoshtegon First Nation5, Ata v. Carter Pontiac Buick Ltd. 6 and Evans v. Teamsters Local Union No. 31.7
In a
decision recently published on the Swedish Arbitration Portal, the Svea Court of Appeal dismissed a party's challenge to the arbitral
award, finding that the party was precluded from challenging
award on several ground, and had
failed to establish that the tribunal had been partial.
In a
decision recently posted on the Swedish Arbitration Portal, the Svea Court of Appeal upheld an
award dismissing an arbitration after the claimant
failed to pay additional advances on costs.
The Court of Appeal declined to interfere with the motion judge's cost
award as the litigation reflected a profound lack of judgment on Raymond's part; Raymond
failed to submit a bill of costs and the motion judge's
decision was entitled to considerable deference.
In that case, while the claim for wrongful dismissal may have
failed, (but consider the
decision in Davidson v. Tahtsa Timber Ltd., 2010 BCCA 528, which provided for «nominal damages» for the dismissal even where none were warranted for wrongful dismissal damages), the court could still have
awarded Human Rights damages, I would argue.
As the Memorandum of Correction explained, in
awarding the sum set out in The Second PFA, the Tribunal had accidentally
failed to carry into the operative part of the
decision a deduction of US$ 18,581,002 which the Claimants had received from third parties and in respect of which they agreed that the KRG was entitled to credit.
The first instance
decision awarding the penalty stipulated in s 214 (4) to the tenant was overturned on appeal by HHJ Bullimore, who found that the landlord was not liable for the penalty where he had correctly protected the deposit but had simply
failed to provide the information to the tenant — as required under s 213 (6)(a)-- within 14 days, as required by s 213 (6)(b).