Not exact matches
Davis Family Vineyards Files Trademark
Infringement Lawsuit: Today, the award - winning and family operated, Healdsburg - based Davis Family Vineyards filed a lawsuit for trademark infringement and unfair and deceptive trade practices against Napa Valley newcomer Davis Estates LLC and others in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of C
Infringement Lawsuit: Today, the
award - winning and family operated, Healdsburg - based Davis Family Vineyards filed a lawsuit for trademark
infringement and unfair and deceptive trade practices against Napa Valley newcomer Davis Estates LLC and others in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of C
infringement and unfair and deceptive trade practices
against Napa Valley newcomer Davis Estates LLC and others in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California...
The District Court denied Kirtsaeng's motion, giving» «substantial weight» to the «objective reasonableness» of Wiley's
infringement claim,» and stating that» «the imposition of a fee
award against a copyright holder with an objectively reasonable» - although unsuccessful - «litigation position will generally not promote the purposes of the Copyright Act,»» and that no other factors «outweighed» that objective reasonableness to warrant fee - shifting.
Work highlights Vacated a $ 930 million patent
infringement award for Samsung Electronics
against Apple in a high - profile design - patent case before the Supreme Court.
The intellectual property
awards protect
against a number of situations ranging from
infringement, inappropriate usage, and unauthorized usage.
The recommendations included legislative changes to permit judges to
award costs
against unsuccessful plaintiffs and provide protection to end users of products from patent
infringement lawsuits.
As a result, the Court vacated a $ 399 Million damage
award against Samsung Electronics Co. in a lawsuit alleging
infringement of design patents covering features of Apple, Inc.'s iPhone smartphones and sent the case back to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeal for further analysis.
The firm's successes include the top patent
infringement award ever issued by a U.S. jury; the nation's first civil liability verdict
against a foreign bank for providing material financial support to terrorists; and one of the top business fraud verdicts ever
awarded in Dallas County.
1749 (2014) has been a real game changer as far as increasing the case - by - case discretion conferred on district judges to determine if a case is exceptional for purposes of
awarding fees
against a losing patent
infringement litigant.
Maria Pallante, the Register of Copyright, has indicated that while statutory damages «have long been an important part of copyright law to ensure that copyright owners are compensated for
infringement,... where actual damages are unworkable,» there may be «plenty to do on the edges» to harmonize damages
awards against individuals.
This time, a Marshall Texas Jury
awarded $ 482,000,000
against Johnson and Johnson and its subsidiary Cordis Corp for Patent
infringement.
A federal appellate court has considered a photographer's appeal of the lower court's
award of attorney's fees in her copyright
infringement lawsuit
against a multiple listing service.