Not exact matches
To the fullest extent permitted
by applicable
law, you agree to indemnify, defend and hold harmless Daily Harvest, and our respective past, present and future employees, officers, directors, contractors, consultants, equityholders, suppliers, vendors, service providers, parent companies, subsidiaries, affiliates, agents, representatives, predecessors, successors and assigns (individually and collectively, the «Daily Harvest Parties»), from and against all actual or alleged Daily Harvest Party or third party claims, damages,
awards, judgments, losses, liabilities, obligations, penalties, interest, fees, expenses (including, without limitation, attorneys» fees and expenses) and costs (including, without limitation,
court costs, costs
of settlement and costs
of pursuing indemnification and insurance),
of every kind and nature whatsoever, whether known or unknown, foreseen or unforeseen, matured or unmatured, or suspected or unsuspected, in
law or equity, whether in tort, contract or otherwise (collectively, «Claims»), including, but not limited to, damages to property or personal injury, that are caused
by, arise out
of or are related to (a) your use or misuse
of the Sites, Content or Products, (b) any User Content you create, post, share or store on or through the Sites or our pages or feeds on third party social media platforms, (c) any Feedback you provide, (d) your violation
of these Terms, (e) your violation
of the rights
of another, and (f) any third party's use or misuse
of the Sites or Products provided to you.
By entering the
Awards, you agree to submit to the
laws of New South Wales and you submit to the non-exclusive jurisdiction
of the
courts of that place and the
courts of appeal from them.
As noted, given that the criteria
of state liability for non-contractual breaches are more strict under (in this case) domestic
law, Spanish
courts have rejected all compensation claims brought
by the affected investors, whereas some
of the tribunals dealing with the ECT claims have
awarded sizeable compensation to the claimants.
Neither does the
Court's approach recognize that arbitral tribunals appear to respect the autonomy
of EU
law, as also testified
by the above quotes from intra-EU arbitral
awards.
However, on 5 December, the
Court of Appeal led by Chief Justice Pereira JA agreed that a purposive interpretation of Part 7.3 (5)(b) should be deployed and that the provision should be read as granting permission to enforce any judgment or arbitral award made «by a foreign court or tribunal and amenable to be enforced at common law&ra
Court of Appeal led
by Chief Justice Pereira JA agreed that a purposive interpretation
of Part 7.3 (5)(b) should be deployed and that the provision should be read as granting permission to enforce any judgment or arbitral
award made «
by a foreign
court or tribunal and amenable to be enforced at common law&ra
court or tribunal and amenable to be enforced at common
law».
Best Lawyers in America for Commercial Litigation and Litigation — Real Estate (2013 - present) Best Lawyers in America — 2016 Lawyer
of the Year for Real Estate in Billings, MT Best Lawyers In America — 2017 Lawyer
of the Year for Real Estate and Commercial Litigation Mountain States Super Lawyers (2014 - Present) AV Preeminent Rating
by Martindale - Hubbell Order
of Barristers
Award Edward A. Cremer, III Environmental
Law Award Member, Montana
Law Review Member, National Moot
Court Team Clyde Augustus Duniway
Award for Outstanding Student Achievement (Colorado College)
Nonetheless, the enactment
of the Arbitration
Law will give foreign investors confidence that if they agree to refer disputes to international arbitration outside Myanmar, an
award may be enforced
by the Myanmar
courts under the Arbitration
Law.
By way
of an originating summons, the plaintiff sought leave
of the High
Court to appeal against the partial
award on a question
of law.
But the circuit
court — noting that the standard for overturning an arbitration
award is that it was made «in manifest disregard
of the
law» — concluded that the district
court erred
by substituting its own decision on the merits for that
of the arbitration panel.
As a result
of its analysis, the High
Court held that the tribunal's
award dealt with a dispute not contemplated
by and not falling within the terms
of the submission to arbitration and therefore set aside the
award in its entirety under Article 34 (2)(a)(iii)
of the Model
Law.
Article 7 (2)
of the Judicial Authority
Law provides for the enforcement outside the DIFC
of «judgments, decisions and orders rendered
by the [DIFC]
Courts and the Arbitral
Awards ratified
by the [DIFC]
Courts».
It is anticipated that the new
law will provide a properly structured procedural framework for domestic and international arbitrations seated in the UAE, with clear rules on when an
award may be challenged, as well as easing the route to enforcement
of awards by giving arbitration
awards the status
of court judgment which can be ratified in the UAE
Courts (thereby avoiding lengthy enforcement proceedings).
The
award, judged
by representatives from five African
Law Societies, was in recognition
of Stephenson Harwood's and Essex
Court's combined expertise in Africa, commitment to training, secondments and knowledge exchange on the continent, as well as the key mandates and cases worked on.
While she was in
law school, Sacha was selected for a prestigious nation - wide
award by the B.C. Civil Liberties Association for her paper in critique
of the B.C. Supreme
Court's decision to refuse to hear the Sex Workers United Against Violence's challenge to the constitutionality
of Canada's prostitution
laws.
In reaching this decision, the High
Court undertook a review
of past Singapore case
law and legal commentary on the nature and purpose
of Article 34 (2)(a)(iii), ultimately deciding that «as a matter
of policy, to hold that Art 34 (2)(a)(iii) does not apply, where no other limb under Art 34 (2) would be engaged, would allow an arbitral tribunal to immunize its
awards against judicial scrutiny
by delivering its conclusions on both jurisdiction and merits in a single
award», which would have been an «unsatisfactory result».
intersections with family
law, public benefits, housing and immigration) Bar Admissions: California, U.S. District
Court, Northern District
of California
Awards: Named in «Top 20 lawyers under 40 ″ in California
by Daily Journal, 2002.
A legal research tool that uses artificial intelligence to help legal researchers quickly find key language critical to a
court's reasoning has been selected
by the American Association
of Law Libraries as winner
of its 2018 New Product
Award.
Nathalie Des Rosiers served as
law clerk to Supreme Court of Canada Justice Julien Chouinard and worked in private practice.She was named one of Canada's 25 most influential lawyers in 2011 and in 2012 by the Canadian Lawyers Magazine; One of Canada's 10 Nation Builders in 2010 by the Globe & Mail; she received the Order of Ontario in 2012; the Médaille de l'Université Paris X in 2007; the Association of Professional Executives of the Public Service of Canada (APEX) Partnership Award in 2004; the Medal of the Law Society of Upper Canada in 1999; and the Order of Merit from AJEFO in 20
law clerk to Supreme
Court of Canada Justice Julien Chouinard and worked in private practice.She was named one
of Canada's 25 most influential lawyers in 2011 and in 2012
by the Canadian Lawyers Magazine; One
of Canada's 10 Nation Builders in 2010
by the Globe & Mail; she received the Order
of Ontario in 2012; the Médaille de l'Université Paris X in 2007; the Association
of Professional Executives
of the Public Service
of Canada (APEX) Partnership
Award in 2004; the Medal
of the
Law Society of Upper Canada in 1999; and the Order of Merit from AJEFO in 20
Law Society
of Upper Canada in 1999; and the Order
of Merit from AJEFO in 2000.
Nevertheless, when the
law requires recognition
by the local
courts regarding the enforcement and validity
of an international
award, creating an unnecessary distinction vis - à - vis domestic
awards, this objective is jeopardized.
Thanks to a $ 100,000 subgrant
of federal STOP grant funds
awarded by the Director
of State
Courts Office, Christine Ann Domestic Abuse Services in Oshkosh has begun funding legal representation for victims
of domestic violence who need representation in family
law matters.
As a
court - appointed arbitrator and a judge pro tem, my skill and extensive knowledge
of personal injury
law have been recognized and
awarded by the
courts.
His lordship also referred to the pre-existing English case
law, as well as a Paris
Court of Appeal decision of 26 June 1991 (in the case of KFTCIC v Icori Estero Spa (unreported), where the French court dismissed a challenge to an award rendered by a tribunal which had been chaired by a barrister from the same chambers as counsel for one of the par
Court of Appeal decision
of 26 June 1991 (in the case
of KFTCIC v Icori Estero Spa (unreported), where the French
court dismissed a challenge to an award rendered by a tribunal which had been chaired by a barrister from the same chambers as counsel for one of the par
court dismissed a challenge to an
award rendered
by a tribunal which had been chaired
by a barrister from the same chambers as counsel for one
of the parties.
It also restored balance to West Virginia tort
law by responding to
court decisions that had endorsed novel theories
of liability, eliminated longstanding defenses, and allowed inflated damage
awards.
Awards recognised
by the DIFC
Court may be enforced outside the DIFC in accordance with the Judicial Authority
Law and recognition under this
Law includes ratification for the purposes
of Article 7
of the Judicial Authority
Law.
Justice Crighton's decision to
award $ 1000 in costs to the respondent can not be fully explained either
by reference to the Alberta Rules
of Court or to case
law in Alberta and New Brunswick.
The Philippines welcomes the issuance today, 12 July 2016,
of the
Award by the Arbitral Tribunal constituted
by the Permanent
Court of Arbitration under Annex VII
of the 1982 United Nations Convention on the
Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) on the arbitration proceedings initiated
by the Philippines with regard to the South China Sea.
Reciprocal enforcement
of judgments in Abu Dhabi and ADGM free zone: a new Memorandum
of Understanding («MoU») sets out the framework for the reciprocal enforcement
of judgments, decisions and orders and the arbitral
awards ratified or recognised
by the onshore civil
law courts in Abu Dhabi and the common
law courts in Abu Dhabi's financial free zone, ADGM.
In fact, the Singapore High
Court went further to state that it would be an abuse
of process to allow a party who had raised a jurisdictional challenge but chose not to participate in most part
of the arbitration, to wait till the opposing party goes through the entire arbitral process, obtains an
award, only to be met
by a setting aside application at the seat when it could have done so within the 30 - day period under Article 16 (3)
of the Model
Law.
Won a case on appeal in DC under Maryland
law on a legal issue
of first impression, saving the client more than $ 1 million that had been
awarded by the trial
court.
General damages are assessed
by looking at Judicial College Guidelines and
by looking at the level
of compensation judges have
awarded in
court for similar injuries (case
law).
Section 46 (b)
of the Arbitration
Law provides that the
court may refuse to recognise and enforce a foreign
award, if any
of the following in submission for recognition and enforcement
of foreign
award can be proved
by the respondent:
A final and binding
award, therefore, precludes the successful party from bringing the same claim (s) again, either in a fresh arbitration or before the national
courts, and precludes both parties from contradicting the decision
of the arbitral tribunal on a question
of law or fact decided
by the
award (Sun Life Insurance Company
of Canada and others v The Lincoln National Life Insurance Company [2006] 1 All ER (Comm) 675; Injazat Technology Capital Ltd v Najafi [2012] EWHC 4171 (Comm)-RRB-.
«AV» rated
by Martindale - Hubbell, (the «AV» rating is the highest rating given and is
awarded only upon reaching «heights»
of professional excellence, both in terms
of legal ability and ethical standards) the
law firm
of ARIAS SANGUINETTI WANG & TORRIJOS, LLP represents clients in complex litigation in state and federal
courts throughout the United States.
It's no exaggeration to say that The
Court, the Supreme
Court of Canada analysis blog produced
by faculty and students at Osgoode Hall
Law School in Toronto, is a contender for this
award every year.
In 2003, he was
awarded the Everard Ver Heyden Foundation Prize
by the Inns
of Court School
of Law and the Middle Temple Sachs Prize for his performance in his bar exams.
The Act lists a variety
of proceedings in respect
of which there is no limitation period (section 16): proceedings for declarations; proceedings to enforce
court orders and other orders that are enforceable in the same way as
court orders; proceedings under the Family
Law Act relating to support; proceedings to enforce arbitration
awards; proceedings
by persons in possession
of collateral to redeem or realize on it; proceedings arising from sexual assault in certain circumstances; proceedings to recover fines, taxes and penalties owing to the Crown; proceedings relating to claims
by the Crown (or
by a delivery agent under social welfare legislation) in various circumstances; proceedings to recover money owing in respect
of certain student loans,
awards and grants.
Moreover, the
Court of Appeal for Ontario has very recently looked at the issue
of punitive damages in the employment
law context in two cases, Boucher v. Wal - Mart Canada Corp., 2014 ONCA 419 (CanLII), considered
by this blog in the post Wal - Mart Rolls Back
Award of Punitive Damages and Pate Estate v. Galway - Cavendish and Harvey (Township), 2013 ONCA 669, considered
by this blog in the post Wrongful Dismissal Damages Carry Punitive Elements: ONCA.
Considering the case
law, the
Court concluded that negotiating damages can be
awarded for breach
of contract where the loss suffered
by the claimant is appropriately measured
by reference to the economic value
of the right which has been breached, considered as an asset.
Spotlight on Outstanding Public Servants: Akerman LLP has been selected as the recipient
of the 2015 Chief Justice's
Law Firm Commendation Award by the Florida Supreme Court and The Florida Bar — the highest recognition of pro bono legal service awarded in the state to a law fi
Law Firm Commendation
Award by the Florida Supreme
Court and The Florida Bar — the highest recognition
of pro bono legal service
awarded in the state to a
law fi
law firm.
The common
law standard applied
by Virginia
courts requires the «most egregious conduct» to justify an
award of punitive damages.
To demonstrate her track record
of success, The Daily Transcript showcased Juanita's recent
awards, including being named a «Life Science Star» for 2016
by LMG Life Sciences; recognized
by The Daily Journal as one
of the Top 100 Lawyers and Top IP Lawyers in California for 2016; and profiled in a National
Law Journal special report with colleague Jon Singer for winning one
of the year's most significant, high - stakes
court cases for Gilead Sciences Inc..
In what's believed to be the first carriage matter to reach the Ontario
Court of Appeal, the court awarded the case to a group of firms led by Rochon Genova LLP instead of another group of law firms led by Koskie Minsky
Court of Appeal, the
court awarded the case to a group of firms led by Rochon Genova LLP instead of another group of law firms led by Koskie Minsky
court awarded the case to a group
of firms led
by Rochon Genova LLP instead
of another group
of law firms led
by Koskie Minsky LLP.
His sheer dedication enabled him to become one
of the youngest to be designated
by the Supreme
Court and thus saw him take on challenging and pinnacle cases that India would not forget and evidently so, as Gopal was honoured with the National
Law Day
Award for Outstanding Jurist, in 2009
by the President
of India, for his consistent professional excellence and adherence to the highest traditions
of the Bar.
Case
law • Over 13,000
court decisions since 1876 • All decisions reported in print since 1970 • All decisions decided prior to 1970 that have been cited
by courts after 1970 • Parallel citations
of all cases published in print appear on the face
of the decision • The most complete collection
of electronically reported decisions in Canada • Every jurisdiction in Canada • In English and in French, as issued
by the
courts • Over 207,000 board, tribunal and arbitration decisions • Parallel citations
of all cases published in print appear on the face
of the decision • In English and in French, as issued
by the decision maker • Alberta Labour Relations Board Decisions Index • Alberta Labour Relations Board Reports • British Columbia Collective Agreement Arbitration
Awards • British Columbia Labour Relations Board Decisions • Canada Industrial Relations Board Decisions • Canada Labour Arbitration Decisions • Canada Labour Code Part II Appeals Officers (Health & Safety) Decisions • Canada Public Service Labour Relations Board Decisions • Canadian Artists and Producers Professional Relations Tribunal Decisions • Décisions de la Commission des lésions professionnelles du Québec • Décisions de la Commission des relations du travail dans la fonction publique • Décisions de la Commission des relations du travail du Québec • Décisions des Agents d'appel en vertu du Code canadien du travail, partie II (santé et securité au travail) • Décisions du Conseil canadien des relations industrielles • Décisions du Tribunal canadien des relations professionnelles artistes - producteurs • Décisions du Tribunal du travail du Québec • Manitoba Grievance Arbitration
Awards • Manitoba Labour Board Decisions • New Brunswick Industrial Relations Board Decisions • New Brunswick Labour Adjudication
Awards • New Brunswick Labour and Employment Board Decisions • New Brunswick Public Service Labour Relations Board Decisions • Newfoundland and Labrador Labour Arbitration
Awards • Newfoundland and Labrador Labour Relations Board Decisions • Northwest Territories Labour Arbitration
Awards • Nova Scotia Labour Arbitration
Awards • Ontario Grievance Settlement Board Decisions • Ontario Labour Arbitration
Awards • Ontario Labour Relations Board Decisions • Ontario Labour Relations Board Reports • Ontario Occupational Health and Safety Adjudication Decisions • Ontario Pay Equity Hearings Tribunal Decisions • Ontario Public Service Grievance Board Decisions • Ontario Workplace Safety and Insurance Appeals Tribunal Decisions • Prince Edward Island Labour Arbitration
Awards • Prince Edward Island Labour Relations Board Decisions • Saskatchewan Labour Arbitration
Awards • Saskatchewan Labour Relations Board Decisions • Yukon Labour Arbitration
Awards
That broad common
law principle was subject to an anomalous, that was, unprincipled, exception regarding claims for interest losses
by way
of damages for breach
of a contract to pay a debt: in London, Chatham and Dover Railway Co v South Eastern Railway Co [1893] AC 429 it was decided that at common
law a
court had no power to
award interest
by way
of damages for the late payment
of a debt.
The only exception is where disclosure is required
by a
court, necessary in connection with a judicial challenge or enforcement
of an
award or otherwise required
by law.
This
award will be presented
by NJC Board
of Trustees Chairman Wm. T. (Bill) Robinson III, Esq. and NJC President Chad Schmucker to the Hon. Michael R. Barrett, Judge
of the United States District
Court for the Southern District
of Ohio and to the Hon. John D. Minton Jr., Chief Justice
of the Kentucky Supreme
Court, for their dedication to advancing judicial excellence and the Rule
of Law.
Further, the
Court (this was a Grand Chamber judgment) points out that the award still has to go through the national court's standard recognition and enforcement process, outside the framework of Title III of the Regulation, instead governed by national residual law as well as the New York Conven
Court (this was a Grand Chamber judgment) points out that the
award still has to go through the national
court's standard recognition and enforcement process, outside the framework of Title III of the Regulation, instead governed by national residual law as well as the New York Conven
court's standard recognition and enforcement process, outside the framework
of Title III
of the Regulation, instead governed
by national residual
law as well as the New York Convention.
The
Court of Appeals correctly identified the constitutional standard for determining whether § 36 - 820, as construed
by the Tennessee
courts to authorize an
award of a veteran's disability benefits as child support, conflicts with federal
law, and is therefore preempted under the Supremacy Clause.
The ECJ decided that because arbitration tribunals set up through investor - state dispute settlement are not part
of the EU judicial system, because such tribunals may resolve disputes that relate to the application or interpretation
of EU
law, and because the
awards of the tribunal are not subject to review
by member state
courts, the decisions
of these tribunals are not compatible with EU
law.