Sentences with phrase «aware of any doctrines»

I guess these religious leaders aren't informed on or aware of the doctrine of snipers or even of individual soldiers on the battlefield.

I'm very aware of doctrine and your big book of fables.

Not exact matches

Are people aware that the office that launched this investigation was the «Congregation of the Doctrine of the Faith» (Congregatio pro Doctrina Fidei)?

Perhaps the best way to judge an individual is by the walk they walk... rather than obscure doctrines that many laymen aren't even aware of.

Recently, I have become aware of different intepretations to key passages which are related to the seven doctrines I listed above.

I still believe these things to be true and biblical, but I am now aware of different ways of approaching these doctrines which require further study on my part.

I am learning that I can not teach christian theology constructively unless I am aware that, historically, the church has done much to damage women, Jews, people of color and the whole inhabited earth; and unless, as a christian, I am learning how our doctrine, discipline and worship continue to reflect and contribute to this abuse of power.

A high doctrine of Scripture and theological novelty do not go well together as everyone ought to be aware by now.

What dangerous doctrines are you aware of?

I am not aware of any elected official of follows his Church's doctrine in all votes.

Later as I studied the Bible more deeply and became aware of many other church traditions, doctrines, and denominations, my Baptist convictions grew stronger.

That being said, not many people are aware of these anomalies on our planet since there is no formal teaching which questions religions and / or deductions of our archaeologists; for this reason, we can not blame anyone who has been raised with strict religious doctrine wishing to display their religious symbol.

This reality makes us aware that every narrow definition of Christian doctrinal certainty will finally have to be abandoned; every claim by any branch of the Christian church to be the true church or the only church will ultimately have to be sacrificed; every doctrine of infallibility — whether of the papacy, or of the Scriptures, or of any sacred tradition, or of any individual experience — will inevitably have to be forgotten.

If this were all Whitehead meant by perception in the mode of causal efficacy, he would merely be describing a commonplace experience of which we are all aware, and his doctrine would be philosophically innocuous; in fact it would not be able to sustain the weight of the philosophical edifice he builds upon it.

The vocal insistence of the religious right on biblical «creationism» and such doctrines as the inerrancy of the Bible is likely to create a one - sided impression of the Christian faith and to turn away people who are not aware of other Christian views.

Nevertheless, no one of whom I am aware has quite said that the rejection of the ancient doctrine of divine impassibility has become a theological commonplace.

This network compensates for a fractious organizational life, and it allows the neophyte who enters the communications network to become aware of other groups, doctrines and styles.

So far as I am aware, process thinkers have not critiqued the traditional Islamic doctrines of God; but the process arguments would seem to be far more devastating when applied, say; to the «occasionalism» of al - Ashari's doctrine of divine power than to the Augustinian or Thomistic notions of God.

And yes, I am aware that there are other verses which support the doctrine of the Inspiration of Scripture, but the only verse which explicitly mentions «inspiration» is 2 Timothy 3:16 (and I will argue later that even this verse does not mention inspiration).

Believe me, atheists are well aware of the contradictions among the Protestants, and the fighint over what is sound doctrine and what is not gets their attention.

The Indonesian Muslims, including those who do not adhere to any mystic doctrine, are well aware of these aspects of the Islamic conception of God.

I was aware of the Shock Doctrine.

And there is no doctrine as far as I am aware that prescibes which quadrants of learning theory should be used together in any given circumstance.

As Benito Mussolini wrote in The Doctrine of Fascism, published in 1932, «Fascism wants man to be active and to engage in action with all his energies; it wants him to be manfully aware of the difficulties besetting him and ready to face them.

But notice that, even though we all now know that the racial science of the early 20th Century was political, not even the Royal Society is so aware of the difference between science and «ideology» that it recognises mid 20th Century malthusianism as a racist doctrine and Paul Ehrlich as a nasty racist.

For example, although I was likely aware in the recesses of my mind about the public trust doctrine (the principle, as explained on Wikipedia, that certain resources are preserved for public use, and that the government is required to maintain it for the public's reasonable use), I found it interesting that some jurisdictions, such as Vermont, have declared their groundwater reserves to be a public trust.