But despite this common structural character,
the axial cultures express different structures of existence.
Not only are the stages of preaxial development treated only formally and
the axial cultures of China and Persia wholly omitted, but also developments in Greece and Palestine have been dealt with schematically in such a way as to ignore other modes of existence which took shape within them.
But this preparation alone would not have transformed India into
an axial culture, any more than parallel developments in the rationalization of culture and religion qualified Egypt as the seat of an axial revolution.
Not exact matches
In a similar way, in this Second
Axial Period, the religious
cultures arising from the First
Axial Period feel threatened by the new secular and humanistic
culture.
Of course, taboos played a large role in all three
cultures, but in the
axial period they were understood differently by each
culture.
Before that
Axial Period, each ethnic group had evolved its own
culture and language, with its own distinctive way of understanding the world and worshipping the forces of nature.
As the First
Axial Period gradually subordinated ethnic
cultures to religious supercultures, such as Christendom or the Umma Muslima, this Second
Axial Period is in turn subordinating the religious supercultures to a new and still emerging
culture.
Maturity, as defined within the
culture, is more easily and more widely attained in preaxial communities than in
axial ones.