But the acceptance of a position which much of Protestant Christianity regards as
axiomatic does not make the Reorganization a Protestant church.
Not exact matches
You don't want to... Look, again, another
axiomatic fact, life is unsafe.
Lewis theology aside (an evangelical against purgatory seems
axiomatic) the reason Americans didn't pick up on Lewis was because if his personal habits?
---------- If it is not
axiomatic that infinite causal chains
do not exist.
Moreover, secular myths having to
do with individual freedom, material success, and perhaps especially the wonders of technology may be an even more powerful source of societal legitimation than, traditional religious arguments by virtue of being grounded in many assumptions that are virtually
axiomatic in the culture.
By now it should be
axiomatic that surveys and polls tell us as much about the people who conduct them as they
do about those they query.
I can not imagine how the
axiomatic framework of such a physics would appear, and I don't like it when one talks about it in dark apostrophes.
It's
axiomatic that the exercises which give you the best results are always the hardest ones to
do.
It's
axiomatic that some of the best writing about sports is
done by people who are not sportswriters per se.
This is an exceptionally parochial view, and a particularly odd one given that it starts from a straw - man premise — it's better to have more sales channels than fewer — that is entirely
axiomatic, that no one would dispute, and that is completely in keeping with what all authors are in fact
doing in various individually customised ways.
That our culture has become more psychologically extreme in the beginning of the 21st century has become
axiomatic, and thus nowhere
do we see such a sudden rethinking of earlier visual art as we
do at The Armory show this week in New York City.
And you either liked or didn't like what they were
doing but it wasn't the kind of
axiomatic, programmatic thing.
Questioning the
axiomatic nature of the premise is the source of the controversy; those who
do so, even mildly, are instantly labeled «deniers».
Don't bother telling us again, because by now it's clear that you are incapable of grasping that you hold a certain philosophy of science as
axiomatic, and that you're going be incognizant and assert that what you just wrote isn't demarcation, or that demarcation isn't philosophy of science, but in fact it is by definition.
In the meantime back in the real world Teh Modulz don't agree with each other, and any intellectually honest and remotely objective observer would not be claiming that CAGW True Believers have, to a (wo) man, declared that this state of affairs proves much of anything other than something which is already
axiomatic: there really is a great deal more forward - looking uncertainty that rearward.
Theory in science
does not emerge from philosophy, is analytically falsifiable, and is not
axiomatic.