Sentences with phrase «axiomatic does»

But the acceptance of a position which much of Protestant Christianity regards as axiomatic does not make the Reorganization a Protestant church.

Not exact matches

You don't want to... Look, again, another axiomatic fact, life is unsafe.
Lewis theology aside (an evangelical against purgatory seems axiomatic) the reason Americans didn't pick up on Lewis was because if his personal habits?
---------- If it is not axiomatic that infinite causal chains do not exist.
Moreover, secular myths having to do with individual freedom, material success, and perhaps especially the wonders of technology may be an even more powerful source of societal legitimation than, traditional religious arguments by virtue of being grounded in many assumptions that are virtually axiomatic in the culture.
By now it should be axiomatic that surveys and polls tell us as much about the people who conduct them as they do about those they query.
I can not imagine how the axiomatic framework of such a physics would appear, and I don't like it when one talks about it in dark apostrophes.
It's axiomatic that the exercises which give you the best results are always the hardest ones to do.
It's axiomatic that some of the best writing about sports is done by people who are not sportswriters per se.
This is an exceptionally parochial view, and a particularly odd one given that it starts from a straw - man premise — it's better to have more sales channels than fewer — that is entirely axiomatic, that no one would dispute, and that is completely in keeping with what all authors are in fact doing in various individually customised ways.
That our culture has become more psychologically extreme in the beginning of the 21st century has become axiomatic, and thus nowhere do we see such a sudden rethinking of earlier visual art as we do at The Armory show this week in New York City.
And you either liked or didn't like what they were doing but it wasn't the kind of axiomatic, programmatic thing.
Questioning the axiomatic nature of the premise is the source of the controversy; those who do so, even mildly, are instantly labeled «deniers».
Don't bother telling us again, because by now it's clear that you are incapable of grasping that you hold a certain philosophy of science as axiomatic, and that you're going be incognizant and assert that what you just wrote isn't demarcation, or that demarcation isn't philosophy of science, but in fact it is by definition.
In the meantime back in the real world Teh Modulz don't agree with each other, and any intellectually honest and remotely objective observer would not be claiming that CAGW True Believers have, to a (wo) man, declared that this state of affairs proves much of anything other than something which is already axiomatic: there really is a great deal more forward - looking uncertainty that rearward.
Theory in science does not emerge from philosophy, is analytically falsifiable, and is not axiomatic.
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z