Sentences with phrase «ayatollahs for»

Google «Muslims bible burning» to get all said references about Muslims burning the bible but note that once the «bowers» of Islam see how they have been conned by their imams and ayatollahs for the last 1400 years, they too will burn their copies of the koran i.e. the angel Gabriel never existed so there is no way that the warmongering, womanizing, and hallucinating Mohammed got any koranic passages from some god.

Google «Muslims bible burning» to get all said references about Muslims burning the bible but note that once the «bowers» of Islam like Muneef see how they have been conned by their imams and ayatollahs for the last 1400 years, they too will burn their copies of the koran i.e. the angel Gabriel never existed so there is no way that the warmongering, womanizing, and hallucinating Mohammed got any koranic passages from some god.

Not exact matches

Actually, it is the Muslims who should burn their copies of the koran for the 1400 year old con job that is pulled on them daily by the imams and ayatollahs.

It is the Muslims that should burn their copies of the koran for the 1400 year old con job that is pulled on them daily by the imams and ayatollahs.

Muslims should burn their copies of the koran for the 1400 year old con job that is pulled on them five times a day by the imams and ayatollahs..

It does not require support for the late ayatollah to say that it demands a particularly agile imagination to collapse his Iran and its sophisticated technological accouterments into a past stage of Europe's development.

Instead it relies on the light of the imams, whom Shi'ites believe receive special divine guidance and on the authority of ayatollahs — a modern title for religious leaders who gain a personal following.

As noted many times, Muslims should burn their copies of the koran for the 1400 year old con job that is pulled on them daily by the imams and ayatollahs.

I did not vote for their religious «leaders,» and I will vote against any of the weak - willed political candidates who allow these self - appointed ayatollahs to dictate policy in the United States.

In America the search for the simple, whether at Walden Pond for Henry David Thoreau, Yosemite Falls for John Muir, or in the pure gospel for the millions, usually comes down to the notion that with a few clear absolutes in mind, life will hold together and we can outargue other sects and outlast the ayatollahs.

«The ayatollah, the leader of Iran, is thanking Jerry Nadler for making this deal possible.»

And I always tell them the same thing: They don't have to do this, and I wouldn't think any less of them if they declined, but, if they decide to go ahead and testify for the defense, they must understand that the ayatollahs of alarmism will get out the hockey sticks and club them to a pulp, as they've just done to Professor Bengtsson.

Two days ago, I wrote that for me the real issue in the upcoming Mann vs Steyn trial is not so much my own personal freedom of speech but the broader freedom to speak given «the climate of fear that Mann and his fellow ayatollahs of alarmism have succeeded in imposing on an important scientific field»:

So his first reaction to the piece was a shot across the bows not at Pielke but at Nate Silver, denouncing his new venture as «yet another outlet for misinformation» - which is Mann's term for anything that dissents even mildly from the ayatollahs of alarmism.

But as important a goal for me is ending the climate of fear that Mann and his fellow ayatollahs of alarmism have imposed on a critical field of science and in the broader sphere of public policy.