Not exact matches
But it wasn't safer than a hospital birth,
at least not if the definition of safety is was your
baby more
at risk of
dying because she was
born at home.
Women need to realize that even though yes, numerous
babies have been
born at home safely — there are numerous others that
died.
We have had several
home birth
babies die in our community over the past year, and looking
at the medical records it seems very unlikely that any of them would have
died had they been
born in a hospital.
But on reflection, it strikes me as perfectly possible that a fair number of the most compromised
babies, who would end up ill or disabled (for whatever reason) if
born in hospital will simply
die if
born at home.
Let's give a little context to what these numbers mean: for every 10,000
babies born at home in the Netherlands, only 6 - 7
babies will
die; for every 10,000
babies born at home in the USA, 17 - 18
babies will
die.
(early neonatal death means the
baby was
born alive but
died sometime in the first seven days), a
baby is three times more likely to
die at a
home birth in the USA with a mortality rate of 1.71 / 1000 versus only 0.64 / 1000
babies dying in the Netherlands.
A
baby born at home with a CPM is 2.4 times more likely to
die than
baby born with a CNM in a birth center.
This means for every 10,000
babies born to low risk moms
at home with a CPM, 7
babies will
die that would have lived had the mother been under the care of a CNM
at a birth center.
This means for every 10,000
babies born at home with a CPM, 12
babies will
die that would have lived had the mother been under the care of a CNM
at a birth center.
In a 2002 study, Seattle pediatrician Jenny W. Pang, MD, MPH, and colleagues from the Washington School of Public Health reported that
babies delivered
at home have nearly twice the risk of
dying shortly after birth as those
born in the hospital.