Sentences with phrase «babies than hospital birth»

Women do indeed deserve respectful, competent care, but your aim is clearly to set up an adversarial relationship between women and their doctors, all while promoting homebirth, a practice that is demonstrably more dangerous for babies than hospital birth.

There are no studies that demonstrate that homebirth with a US homebirth midwife is less likely to kill or permanently disable either mother or baby than hospital birth under the care of an ob.

You can't accept the fact that MANA's own datasets prove that homebirth in the US is more dangerous to the baby than hospital birth, yet you persist in flinging mostly lame rejoinders and getting your dander up when anyone has the temerity to call you on your ignorance.

Not exact matches

Typical birth in a US hospital «costs» about 20 % more than the Lindo Wing, a private, luxury wing in London where the royal baby was born

I might not have had that horrible surgical experience, might have been able to hold my baby sooner than 8 hours after birth, would not have had my system pumped full of drugs I'm allergic to, and would have been able to nurse my baby, instead of the uneducated hospital staff shoving bottles at him.

A woman who had a still birth with a midwife present summed it up beautifully — home birth and UC babies must be more cherished than hospital birthed babies.

Australian researchers found that new mothers were more likely to be breastfeeding their newborns a few months after delivery if their hospitals followed the Baby - Friendly Hospital Initiative (BFHI) guidelines, than if they gave birth in a hospital accredited by the IniHospital Initiative (BFHI) guidelines, than if they gave birth in a hospital accredited by the Inihospital accredited by the Initiative.

At Advocate, the first hospital in the area to feed low birth weight babies and others at risk for the condition exclusively with breast milk, NEC is down by more than half, said Jeffrey George, hospital director of neonatology.

Another lengthy scan with very little discussion between the technician and us, again our worrying about our being steamrolled into a management plan without through evaluation of the risks and benefits, or being essentially pushed into a hospital birth because it would be best for the baby but also mean that I would not have the option of birthing vaginally was all a little more than my tear ducts could bear.

Low risk birth in the Netherlands at home with a midwife is more likely to result in a DEAD baby than high risk birth in a hospital with a doctor.

while being coerced to push even though I wanted to breath the babies down, I didn't get to see them at all for 15 hours after they were born because the hospital staff didn't get their act together, not because it was medically necessary, etc., so much so that the head of OB (my office doc) later admitted they had me on suicide watch because what happened was so different than my birth plan... I wasn't stuck on exact details, especially because twins throw a loop in all of it, but it was nothing like I had hoped for, at all.

The perinatal (around the time of birth) death rate of babies born in nonhospital settings is much higher than for babies born in a hospital, even though their mothers are supposedly lower - risk.

What floors me is how people continue to ignore the glaringly obvious fact, that homebirth, even under the best circumstances, continues to kill mothers and babies at a rate that is far higher than births that occur in hospital settings.

The kind thing to say to someone considering a homebirth is: Choose homebirth if you like, but know that your baby is far more likely to die or be injured than during a birth in hospital.

Your midwives saw to it that was maintained as well by not warning you that all of the data on homebirth in the US show a 3 - 8x higher risk of the baby dying in homebirth than in hospital birth.

If ALL births were done at home, you'd have five times as many dead babies than you'd have when compared to ALL births done in a hospital.

But it wasn't safer than a hospital birth, at least not if the definition of safety is was your baby more at risk of dying because she was born at home.

In Colorado, licensed homebirth midwives have a perinatal death rate more than double that of all hospital birth in the state (including premature babies).

To put this into context, over time, Dr Amy has presented several different lines of hard evidence that the death rate for babies is higher in home birth than it is at hospitals, in America.

However, MORE people (per capita) have devastating home birth experiences — ending with dead babies or babies with brain damage or permanent nerve damage — than hospital births.

His book is a tinderbox that will infuriate both the pro-C-section lobbyists (babies born this way are five times more likely to suffer allergies he points out) and the natural birthers (infant death globally between birth and 28 days appears twice as high after planned homebirth than hospital birth).

Where you've gone wrong is in claiming that home birth is no more risky to the baby's life and brain function than hospital birth is.

I wonder why he didn't just say» Homebirth attended by a CPM is safe or safer than hospital birth if you don't count the fact that 3 times as many babies die»?

The FACT is... more women DO die in hospital births (from things that could be prevented, or from unnecessary interventions) than in home births, and that women were NOT «dying in droves» from home births back in the day... death during birth was fairly uncommon until women were forced into dirty birth centers with doctors knocking them out and delivering their babies without being held to any sanitation standards because promiscuity was on the rise and we had to keep the «dirty women» separate from the rest of the hospital.

Most first births are slower than actively managed maternity units would like and so labours in hospitals get hurried along by either physical or chemical means, and whilst most babies can cope well with this artificial speeding up of the labour, some find it a challenge and become distressed requiring further interventions.

The point is that, although yes, some women and babies still die in the hospital: First: That number is FAR LOWER than what it was when everyone gave birth at home Second: OBs and medical professionnal are constantly trying to improve their methods and reduce the mortality rate even more.

The most recent large scale study comparing outcomes for mother and baby reported in the British Medical Journal last month showed that for women who had previously given birth, adverse outcomes were less common among planned home births (1 per 1,000) than among planned hospital births (2.3 per 1,000).

The vast majority of births in Ireland take place in hospital, either in a dedicated maternity hospital or in the maternity unit of an acute hospital, but some women choose to have their baby at home and others choose a more low - tech approach in which they are cared for primarily by midwives rather than obstetricians.

The vast majority of births in Ireland take place in hospital, either in a dedicated maternity hospital or in the maternity unit of an acute hospital, but some women choose to have their baby at home and others choose a more low - tech approach such as a birth centre or a midwifery led unit in which they are cared for primarily by midwives rather than obstetricians.

In other words, I would not conclude that C - SECTION «dramatically decreases», because it would seem that MORE babies have brain injuries with c - sections than hospital births.

In moms who had given birth before, the transfer rate was much lower and the baby death rate was not statistically higher than in the hospital.

Homebirth is very different than hospital birth — people do not come and wait in the other room until the baby is born.

It seems that the rates reported in this database for low - risk pregnancies (excluding malpresentation and other factors) are all as good as or better in every category other than intrapartum death rate of babies, which I am having a hard time finding in the other literature on hospital births in the U.S. for low - risk, white women.

You have a higher chance of complications during labor and birth than a woman delivering a single baby, so you should plan to deliver in a hospital.

Isabelle Brabant, a self - trained midwife who has delivered more than 400 babies, arrived at a hospital less than 10 minutes after the baby stopped breathing during a home birth and her resuscitation efforts failed.

A baby is 3 to 6 times more likely to die at a home birth than in a hospital.

Premature babies tend to stay longer at the hospital than other right - timed babies and may face some or the other kind of health concern in the initial few days after birth.

Many studies on breastfeeding preterm and low birth - weight babies complain that the nutrients in breast milk are lower than in chemically derived milks, and breastfed preemies sometimes gain weight more slowly during their stay in the hospital.

In July, WBH distinguished itself as one of 193 active Baby - Friendly hospitals and birth centers in the United States; there are more than 20,000 worldwide.

TL; DR: Home birth midwives are more than prepared, and that includes being more than prepared to get you and your baby safely and quickly to a hospital if it becomes necessary (and they'll make that determination — «necessary» — long before it veers into «dangerous.»)

Oft quoted research studies state 3X to 10X more babies die in the first week after low risk homebirth than hospital birth.

And I would bet that the hospital horror stories are more to do with the womens «feelings» about her birth experience rather than the actual damaged / dead babies from the home birth horror stories.

«I wanted more closeness with my baby than I had with the hospital births,» Rzechula said.

I knew that it would be different than getting care at an OB office or giving birth in the hospital but what I didn't count on was the continued support I have received since having our baby.

All out of hospital birth is always going to result in more dead babies than in hospital birth simply for the lack of immediate access to an operating room, but home birth with a CNM tends to only be about twice as risky, whereas, thanks to these numbers from MANA, we know that using a CPM makes it at least 4.5 times riskier.

But these homebirth midwives feel confident delivering babies far from the resources of a hospital after far less training and fewer independent births than I did.

Signed, 3 babies at home, and now happily back in the hospital where I have been treated with far more kindness, respect and compassion than I and my babies ever received in a home birth setting.

If every woman planning a homebirth signed a piece of paper saying «I understand that my baby is 3 - 5x more likely to die in a homebirth than a hospital birth.

In such a case, would it not be better to allow gravity, i.e; the birth mother standing and moving whilst in labour, to take charge rather than the birthing mother instead lying on her back in an ambulance and then hospital along with the accompanying substantial increase in stress levels?I suppose all I am trying to say is that IF my partner and I were to have a second baby, I really would like to support my partner once more in having a home birth.

The rate of infection is much lower in a birth center than in a hospital, but only your home has the germs / flora to which you (and therefore your baby) have already developed immunity.